Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, December 1998, pages
51, 95-96
Special Report
Cluttered Omnibus Appropriations Bill Finally
Passes
By Shirl McArthur
Finally, on Oct. 21, 12 days after it was scheduled
to adjourn, the 105th Congress closed up shop and headed home to
the important business of campaigning for re-election. The final
agenda item was to pass a huge, omnibus appropriations
bill that combined the eight appropriations bills that Congress
had not been able to pass previously, usually because one special
interest group or another had managed to tack on one or more controversial
provisions.
The bill as finally passed was called a compromise
because both sides gave highly publicized concessions in some key
areas, but it was also called a Christmas tree, because
it was loaded with extraneous trinkets in an effort to get as many
yes votes as possible. To pay for at least some of those trinkets,
President Bill Clinton and the Congress collaborated to remove $2.4
billion from the District of Columbia pension trust fund, presumably
on the grounds that DC residents dont get a vote in Congress
anyway. Many of the extras were classic pork-barrel provisions designed
to fund pet projects, but others were provisions designed to appeal
to a key constituency. And one of those key constituencies was the
Israel lobby.
Foreign Affairs Provisions
The foreign affairs provision that has received the
most headlines is the agreement to contribute almost $18 billion
toward an international replenishment of funds for IMF lending programs,
provided that the IMF agrees to certain reforms. The Senate had
already approved the full $18 billion, but the House had only agreed
to provide $3.4 billion.
Another highly publicized item that, in fact, did
not happen was the apparent agreement to fund approximately half
of the back dues that the U.S. owes to the U.N. This didnt
happen because it was made contingent upon the president agreeing
to sign a pet project of Senate Foreign Relations committee Chairman
Jesse Helms (R-NC), the Foreign Affairs Reform Act (FARA), which
Congress had passed in March and April. It had not yet been sent
to Clinton for fear that he would veto it because of another provision
restricting funding for family planning groups that assist women
in obtaining abortions. As soon as the omnibus bill was passed,
the FARA was sent to Clinton, and he promptly vetoed it. Unfortunately
for the Israel lobby, that meant he also vetoed the provisions concerning
Jerusalem that had been slipped into the bill, as well as other
Middle East provisions that would not have advanced U.S. interests
in the region. (See the May/June issue of the Washington Report
for a more complete description of other Middle East-related
items in the Foreign Affairs Reform Act.)
However, Senator Helms succeeded in getting his foreign
affairs reform enacted anyway, because he managed to slip the reform
portion into the back end of the omnibus bill. This means that the
parts of the original FARA that abolished the Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency and the U.S. Information Agency, folding their functions
into the Department of State, were enacted. The Agency for International
Development remains nominally independent, but its administrator
will now report to the secretary of state. One Middle East-related
provision from the original FARA that was retained was the section
concerning claims by U.S. firms against the government of Saudi
Arabia. This section requires the secretary of state to periodically
report to the Congress on the specific actions taken by the State,
Defense, and Commerce departments toward resolving any commercial
disputes between U.S. firms and the government of Saudi Arabia.
A potentially troublesome item that made its way into
the omnibus bill was the establishment of a National Commission
on Terrorism. This initially was an independent bill, sponsored
by Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), who was an original sponsor of the anti-religious
discrimination bill (see separate article, p. 45). The Terrorism
Commission was folded into the House version of the foreign aid
bill, and a modified version made it into the omnibus bill. As passed,
the provision establishes a 10-member commission, with three members
appointed by the Senate majority leader, another three members appointed
by the speaker of the House, and two members each appointed each
by the Senate minority leader and the House minority leader. The
commissions stated purpose is to review counter-terrorism
policies regarding the prevention and punishment of international
acts of terrorism directed at the United States. On its face,
this provision does not seem objectionable. Much will depend, however,
on whether or not the appointed members of the commission carry
with them pre-conceived anti-Arab or anti-Muslim biases, which would
prevent them from dealing equally with all kinds of terrorism, regardless
of where or with whom it originates.
Finally, in terms of major items, the omnibus bill
restores most of the $1.1 billion that Congress previously had cut
from the administrations foreign aid request. However, this
will have little effect on the Middle East, since most of the specific
earmarks for Middle East countries did not change.
Major Middle East Provisions
The Middle East Peace Facilitation Act was effectively
renewed in the same way as was done last year. Briefly, U.S. officials
may meet with Palestinian officials and the Palestinian Authority
(PA) may maintain diplomatic offices in the U.S., and economic aid
may be provided to the PA, provided that the president issues a
waiver certifying that such actions are in the national security
interests of the U.S. The waiver is to be valid for six months,
renewable for another six months.
The same standard clause regarding the Arab League
boycott of Israel as was in last years appropriations bill
was also included in the omnibus bill. It gives the sense
of Congress (meaning that its non-binding) that the
president should take more concrete steps to encourage Arab League
countries to renounce the boycott; take a countrys participation
in the boycott into consideration when determining whether to sell
arms to the country; encourage U.S. allies and trading partners
to enact laws prohibiting compliance with the boycott; and report
to Congress the steps taken to bring about a public renunciation
of the boycott and expand the normalization of ties between Arab
League countries and Israel.
The $5.4 billion limit on aid to Israel, Egypt, Jordan,
Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza, and various Middle East monitoring
and working groups that was first inserted in last years aid
appropriations bill was retained in the omnibus bill. However, since
aid to Israel and Egypt was reduced by $110 million (see below)
this should leave more available for allocation to other Middle
Eastern countries. The provision also contains a waiver provision
allowing the cap to be broken if the president determines it is
important to the national security interest of the U.S. to
do so.
Provisions Affecting Specific Countries
Aid earmarked for Israel was as described in the previous
issue of the Washington Report: $1.08 billion for economic
aid, $1.86 billion for military aid, and $70 million in refugee
resettlement assistance for a total of $3,010,000,000. This
represents a reduction in economic aid of $120 million, an increase
in military aid of $60 million, and a decrease in refugee resettlement
assistance of $10 million, for a net decrease of $70 million. In
addition, the amount of military aid that Israel is allowed to spend
in Israel rather than in the United States is increased to $490
million.
Another provision affecting Israel that was slipped
into the bill is one denying funds to the International Atomic Energy
Agency unless the secretary of state determines that Israel is not
being denied its right to participate in the agency.
Another provision affecting Israel is what some people
have called the Flatow bill. Alisa Flatow, a New Jersey
resident who was a student in Israel, was killed in the bombing
of a bus bound for a Jewish settlement in Gaza. Her family sued
Iran (claiming that Iran was the backer of Islamic Jihad, which
was believed responsible for the bomb) under the 1996 anti-terrorism
bill and won a judgment of $247.5 million. However, when the family
attempted to attach Iranian diplomatic and other assets in the U.S.,
the Departments of State and Justice intervened to block them. In
response, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) introduced a bill making
it illegal for any U.S. department or agency to intervene to block
such a judgment, regardless of such niceties as diplomatic immunity.
Lautenbergs bill did not pass, but he did get it slipped into
the omnibus bill. However, the provision in the omnibus bill does
allow for a presidential waiver, and Clinton exercised that authority
the same day that he signed the omnibus bill, thus infuriating the
Flatow family.
Aid earmarked for Egypt was also the same as described
in the previous issue of the Washington Report: $775 million
in economic aid, a reduction of $40 million, and $1.3 billion of
military aid for a total of $2,075,000,000. In addition, a provision
aimed at Egypt that was first inserted in last years aid appropriations
bill was retained in the omnibus bill. This provision would withhold
5 percent of all non-humanitarian assistance to any country certified
by the president to be violating U.N. sanctions against Libya. However,
this provision does allow for a presidential waiver in the
national security interest of the U.S.
Aid earmarked for Jordan is slightly different than
described in the previous issue. Economic aid is the same, $150
million. However, military aid is earmarked at $45 million (down
from $75 million last year), plus $25 million worth of training
and drawdown of Defense Department stocks.
The only other earmark is for Tunisia, and it is lower
than described in the previous issue: $7 million in military assistance,
including $5 million worth of training and drawdown of Defense Department
stocks.
Although the bill contains no specific earmark for
Lebanon, Sen. Spencer Abraham (R-MI) was moderately successful in
gaining support for the American University of Beirut and the Lebanese
American University (formerly named Beirut University College and,
before that, Beirut Womens College). The report language accompanying
the omnibus bill recommends at least $15 million for
the American Schools and Hospitals Abroad program, and specifically
mentions the two institutions in Lebanon.
Most of the provisions that were described in the
previous issue of the Washington Report were, indeed, in
the omnibus bill. These were that the U.S. should urge the U.N.
General Assembly to impose a multilateral oil embargo on Libya if
Libya does not turn over the two accused Pan Am 103 bombers to the
Netherlands for trial by Oct. 29, 1998; the United Nations Special
Commission (UNSCOM) should maintain vigorous inspections within
Iraq and the U.S. government should oppose any efforts to ease those
inspections; there should be no easing of U.S. policy toward Iran
until there is credible and sustained evidence of change
in Irans policies; no funds are to be used to provide any
kind of assistance to the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation;
and $8 million (as opposed to the $10 million previously reported)
is earmarked for the Iraqi democratic opposition. Of
the $8 million, no less than $3 million should go to the Iraqi National
Congress. (This apparently comes on top of the $97 million provided
to the Iraqi opposition under the recently passed Iraq Liberation
Actsee Congress Watch, page 21.)
In addition the omnibus bill contains the standard
provisions prohibiting any direct or indirect assistance to Cuba,
Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Iran, Sudan, or Syria.
And Finally
The omnibus bill includes a subsidy from the U.S.
taxpayer of $32.1 million, including $1.575 million for repairs,
for the Holocaust Museum. This compares with $32.2 million, including
$20 million for repair and rehabilitation of the aging structure,
for the John F. Kennedy Center in Washington DC.
Shirl McArthur, a retired foreign service
officer, is a senior consultant with Bruce Morgan Associates, an international
research and consulting firm in the Washington, DC area. |