Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, December 1998, pages
46-47
Special Report
Sudanese American Seeks to Halt Sudans
15-Year Civil War With Model Peace Village There
By Joshua Azriel
Of the civil wars raging throughout Africa today,
none has received as little attention in the West as that in Sudan.
A brutal civil war raged there for 15 years. For the past nine years
the principal protagonists have been the governing National Islamic
Front regime of Omar al-Bashir, who came to power nine years ago
in a military coup in the north, and John Garang of the Sudanese
Peoples Liberation Army (SPLA) in the south.
There are a multitude of internationally sponsored
peace plans for Sudan. But as both sides talk of peace, the government
in Khartoum, the nations capital, is actively drafting second-
through fourth-year college students for military service. Therefore
any successful peace initiative may have to arise from among the
Sudanese citizens not involved with either of the protagonists.
Elwaleed Mousa is an engineer and a second-year graduate
student in political science at the Unversity of Florida. Born in
Evanston, Illinois, and raised in Khartoum, this 33-year-olds
home and heart is in Sudan. He became familiar with al-Daein, a
city of 250,000 people in western Sudan, because his family has
a vacation home there. Now he is working to construct in the area
what he calls a peace model village for western Sudan,
where Muslims and Christians can live together in peace made possible
by sustainable development.
Through building a village and creating
a harmonious society, we can achieve any political agenda with peace
and stability through development, Mousa explains. People
in Sudan cannot yet access education, they lack shelter, have no
means of transportation from their farms to nearby villages, and
cannot afford medicine. The children are malnourished.
Mousa wants to convert the village of Bawat al Khel,
located 15 miles from Al-Daein and currently home to 250 families,
into his peace model village. In return for outside development
assistance, Bawat al Khel residents have agreed to the arrival of
300 displaced Dinka families currently residing in Nyala, a city
of approximately 250,000 in western Sudan.
Members of the Dinka tribe have not been welcome
in Nyala because of a lack of historical ties with the citys
residents. But the Dinka do have traditional ties with the villages
of Bawat al-Khel, 900 miles from the fighting.
There are three phases to the peace model villages
development: Phase One is currently under way with the construction
of a town well. Phase Two will build a water tower for the residents
and a ground water tank for farm animals. Bawat al Khels women
and children now travel two hours each way for water. The new well
and water tower would eliminate this burden.
Phase Three is the development of the village itself.
A literacy center, vocational center, chapel, and a common farm
for growing vegetables are to be built. I want the well to
be a nucleus for a rural development program including literacy
development, vocational training programs for young men and women,
a common worship place for Muslims and Christians, and to establish
a small farm, Mousa stated.
A management firm in Khartoum was selected to design
the village. Survey engineers will provide plans based upon the
lands natural resources and features. In doing so, they will
work with the Sudanese Environmental Society from Al-Daein. Non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) such as Save the Children also are supporting
Mousas initiative.
So far, $30,000 has been raised in the United States
for Phase One. Another $10,000 is needed to complete the well. In
order to begin Phase Two, $40,000 will be needed to build the water
tower and tank.
Mousa does not believe that the government in Khartoum
will object to the village if it is kept under the auspices of NGOs.
Mohamed Khalil, who served as speaker of Sudans
Constituent Assembly from 1986 to 1988 and also served in several
Sudanese cabinet positions in the 1960s, believes that Mousas
chances of success in the prevailing political atmosphere are slim
though not impossible. The NIF regime is now trying hard to
discredit reports of slavery and other violations of basic rights.
It is, therefore, conceivable that it would find it embarrassing
to refuse permission for the proposed peace model village,
Khalil said.
Khalil, who now serves as vice president for social
development at WorldSpace Foundation in Washington, DC, adds that
Elwaleed Mousa is very well suited to cope with such an exercise.
He hails from a family that wields considerable influence, and he
knows the locations and custom of the tribes of Western Sudan.
A second critic of the government, Michael Chege,
director of African Studies at the University of Florida, agrees
with Khalil. He commends Mousa for his selfless plan but does not
believe the government in Khartoum will allow the village to exist
unless it suits that governments own purposes.
Chege does not believe that al-Bashirs government
wants an area where Muslims and Christians can live in a cooperative
setting. If they [the government] feel the village is not
a threat to the National Islamic Front government, then they might
allow it for the short run, but not in the long run because the
governments goal is to Islamacize the entire country,
Chege contends.
They might want the publicity the village would
bring. In the south there are a large number of NGOs working in
development programs feeding the poor, treating the sick, sheltering
the homeless. The government will tolerate that.
Even if the government gives the village its approval,
Chege believes the countrys general political instability
would make it difficult to bring supplies to western Sudan. He notes
that a lot of relief supplies have been stolen during the 15 years
of fighting.
From audits of the United Nations and other
NGOs, Chege charges, a portion of this relief is getting
hijacked by the army and some of it is getting hijacked by the rebel
groups that are fighting the Islamic government.
He notes that the regime mainly controls the capital
and the Red Sea port in the east. In some places in western Sudan,
where Bawat al Khel is located, the government has been known to
contract militias for security. Chege says all these isssues must
be taken into consideration when planning a major infrastructure
project.
For his part Mousa, who grew up in Khartoum, is confident
that the assistance of NGOs will give the village the legitimacy
it needs to succeed. Neither side in the fighting wants to be identified
with new catastrophes such as last springs famine.
It was only the threat of famine that prompted both
sides to abide by a cease-fire last spring so that food and medicinal
supplies could be delivered to 350,000 Sudanese in Bahr el-Ghazal
in the southern region of the country. In a country of approximately
28 million people, nearly 350,000 Sudanese were in danger of starvation.
Mousa believes that if Sudan is to have any type of
future, it must begin with initiatives from the Sudanese people
themselves, such as with his peace village.
Ultimately, people in Sudan have to find a formula
to live together peacefully regardless of religion, Mousa
explains. By building a village and creating a harmonious
society, we can achieve any political agenda with peace and stability
through development, and we will create well-rounded human beings.
Washington Report readers wishing to contribute
to development of the peace model village may send their contributions
to IARAUSA, P.O. Box 7084, Columbia, MO 65204-7084, tel. 1
(800) 298-1199. Their letters should specify that the donation is
for the Sudan Well project.
Joshua
Azriel is a reporter for mid-Florida Public Radio and a graduate student
at the University of Florida. SIDEBAR
U.S. Africa Expert Says Sudans African Neighbors
Taking Increasing Role in Its Civil War
As civil war continues between Sudans predominantly
Muslim government in the north and largely Christian or animist
tribes in the south, the countrys African neighbors are taking
sides, giving the conflict wider geopolitical implications for the
region, according to Michael Chege, director of African studies
at the University of Florida.
Chege says that Egypt, Sudans neighbor to the
north, has long opposed the NIF. Egypt has been trying very
hard to build a coalition with some credible Sudanese activists
from the north and south to oppose Al-Bashirs government,
but so far with little success, Chege stated.
Chege says that the governments of Ethiopia, Uganda,
Eritrea, and Rwanda all have been supporting the rebels in southern
Sudan with money and arms. They are opposed to a government based
strictly on Islam, and would prefer a more moderate and less ideological
regime. In response, Sudan has been siding with the Laurent Kabila
faction in the civil conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The Kabila government is now opposed to the
governments in Uganda, Rwanda, and probably Ethiopia and Eritrea,
Chege explains. Though they [the Sudanese government] have
no love for Kabila, it is the concept of the enemy of my enemy is
now my friend. Kabila is receiving Sudanese support from Khartoum.
Chege also charges that Sudan is funding rebel groups in Uganda
and Eritrea. This makes for a highly unstable geopolitical
calculation in the region.
Chege labels the government in Khartoum a terrorist
one because, he says, the NIF is an offshoot of the old Muslim Brotherhood.
He describes the NIF as the military organization of President al-Bashir
and Speaker of the Parliament Hassan al-Turabi.
The NIF came to power in a coup in 1989 as the previous
government of Al-Saddiq al-Mahdi was close to a peaceful agreement
involving autonomy and mutual religious toleration with John Garangs
forces.
One of the roots of the Sudanese conflict is the oil
in the south, Chege explains. He says the Khartoum regime wants
to use revenues from the oil reserves to overcome the countrys
chronic financial problems. Autonomy or independence for the south,
however, might lock out al-Bashirs government from control
of these reserves.
Chege states that Khartoum is spending close to one
million dollars a day on the war, and that this is revenue it does
not have. Cotton, a once lucrative commodity, is no longer a major
crop in Sudan and, because of the civil war, the oil is not being
pumped out.
What else has Sudan got? asks Chege. Most
of the revenue today comes from Sudanese employed in the Gulf states.
Most of them work there as manual laborers. This is not the type
of economy upon which one can build an Islamic revival. Its
not possible to continue this way.
Chege believes that the real power in Khartoum in
not with Al-Bashir but with Al-Turabi. In the past, Al-Turabi has
stated that Islam is becoming entrenched throughout the country.
Although the current government has spoken of renegotiating the
constitution to provide autonomy for the south, it continues to
persecute religious minorities, Chege charges. And, despite talk
about peace, there has been little actual negotiating. Chege therefore
believes that, despite contradictory signals from the government,
Al-Turabis ultimate goal is to Islamicize the country.
Is this the sign of peace? I think not,
says Chege. This is the philosophy of Al-Turabi, so the question
that ought to be asked is will the real Hassan al-Turabi please
stand up?
Is the drafting of university students for military
service a sign of peace, and of a constitutional democracy that
is tolerant of ethnic and religious pluralism? I think not.
As long as the Sudanese government continues
actively promoting Islam as the official religion of a state with
large Christian and other minorities, Chege believes, regional tensions
will continue to escalate. |