Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, December
1997, Pages 59, 96
Bookburners and Their Victims: First-Hand Accounts of Pro-Israel
McCarthyism
Young Reporter Finds That at the Demand of Pro-Israel
Advertisers, Freedom of the Press is Revokable
By Anne Thomas
Strange how long it took me to "see the light"
about the truth of the Middle East tragedy. I wasn't awakened until
1956.
I began working in the 1940s. For a short time I was
a reporter on my small hometown paper. I quickly moved on to the
United Press in Boston. World War II was still raging. I read war
news from Europe and the Pacific coming through on ticker tapes;
felt horror at the lists of dead soldiers in the editor's drawer,
waiting for Washington's release, a few names at a time.
When the war ended and our soldiers liberated the
concentration camps, I wept at the sight of frail emaciated Jewish
survivors. Later, when news broke that the United Nations was giving
the Jews a place to live in Palestine—"a land without
people for a people without land," I was happy for them.
How little did I know! I read every newspaper I could
get my hands on, but I never read about Jewish Zionist terrorists
led by Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir massacring tiny villages
like Deir Yassin and Qiyba in the dead of night while the people
slept, forcing the flight of the indigenous people of Palestine.
I went on to Washington, DC in 1949 and free-lanced
some stories to the North American News Alliance (NANA). One day
I interviewed Mrs. Charles Malek at the Watergate. Her husband at
the time was president of the United Nations General Assembly. He
drafted the Human Rights Charter for that body and Eleanor Roosevelt
lauded him as "the brilliant Charles Malek."
Mrs. Malek was upset because no matter how important
an issue her husband pressed, The New York Times buried the
story on the back of the paper. But every insignificant drop of
news about Israel was blown up on page one.
A warning bell was rung, but I didn't hear it. Why
would the flagship paper of the land do that?
Perhaps my early training was to blame for my inability
to question received wisdom. I had had 12 years of Catholic education
where, along with classical studies, I embraced allegiance, first
to God, and second to country. Later in high school covering school
news for my hometown paper, I became enthralled with newspaper work,
and added a third allegiance of my own, to the Press.
I read biographies of the men who started the great
papers and I believed that newspapers were courageous, honest and
objective. I found it hard to believe that the Times would
deliberately bury important news. Naive as I was, I knew nothing
about the secret places and dark rooms where supporters of Israel
were orchestrating the policy of silence to hide the truth of its
actions from Americans.
Decades have flown by, but the pitying glance Mrs.
Malek gave me is still fresh in my mind. I wish she were around
now, so I could apologize.
Someone had alerted important Jewish leaders.
I went to work for Congressional Quarterly News Features,
whose major work was research, keeping an eye on Congress and lobbies.
When Israel was carved out of the land of Palestine,
the United Nations gave it 3,500,000 acres of the most arable land,
and left poor land for the Palestinians. During the 1948 war in
which Israel swallowed a couple million more Palestinian acres,
the stories in our press, dictated by Israel's supporters, reported
that the Arabs had attacked first, determined to toss the Israelis
into the sea. In fact, the Arabs, though poorly armed, had entered
Palestine to protect the Palestinians who were being forced out
of their villages at gunpoint. The truth lay dead at the feet of
most Americans.
In 1952 I rushed back home to Massachusetts; my mother
was seriously ill. My father was gone. As the oldest in the family,
I was responsible. When my mother stabilized, I went to work on
the Boston Post. A one-time Pulitzer Prize-winning paper,
the Post was under new ownership.
In those days the federal government was bringing
in VIPs from foreign countries all over the world to give them a
look at American democracy. Washington provided tickets and travel
expenses to the visitors, helped them lay out an itinerary, and
sent them on their way. A great many headed to Boston. A Washington
contact would alert me to the arrivals one by one and I interviewed
a couple of hundred people from Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand,
Africa, Asia, Lebanon, Egypt and Iran. They included members of
parliaments, academics, journalists, medical doctors and even a
military man from Tito's Yugoslavia.
During this time, I interviewed Dr. Stephen Penrose,
president of the American University of Beirut. I faithfully reported
his words. But, stunning as it seems to me today, the horror of
his tale of what Israel had done to the Palestinians did not yet
register. Why were our government and our press so silent on this
tale of Israeli victimizing?
No Early Repercussion
The Boston Post ran the Penrose story. There
was no repercussion. The American Jewish battering ram was not yet
organized, I guess. The Penrose story I wrote in 1954 or 1955 laid
out the tragedy of Palestine graphically. But few woke up.
In the 1950s Egypt had its time in the news. Gamal
Abdel Nasser, a colonel in the Egyptian army, organized an uprising
and knocked King Farouk off his throne. In a short time Nasser became
president of Egypt. He took back Egypt's Suez Canal from England
and France, who had controlled it for some 86 years and who had
profited mightily from it.
Israel began pressing France and England to join her
in attacking Egypt and taking back the canal. After they launched
the attack an Egyptian VIP came through Boston and I interviewed
him. He did not speak of the war, nor answer any questions about
it. Instead, he laid out the history of the canal for me. The Suez
Canal lay entirely within Egyptian territory, deep inside its borders,
and 120,000 Egyptians had died constructing it.
(I had to wait for graduate studies in the late 1960s
to learn the story of how the canal came to be built, and how England
and France colluded to wrest it from the hands of Egypt and its
Khedive. In fact, I did my dissertation on Suez.)
And that 1956 war? President Dwight D. Eisenhower,
the only U.S. president with guts since Franklin D. Roosevelt, stopped
that war and ordered Israel, Britain and France to retreat.
My Egyptian's story was a very simple one, really,
even innocuous. I handed it in on a Wednesday. It was to run in
Sunday's "News of the World." But by the next day, Thursday,
all hell had broken loose, although I didn't know it.
My department worked late Friday nights making up
our section of the Sunday paper. Just as I was leaving to join my
colleagues on the floor below, I got a telephone call. The caller,
who was Jewish, wanted the name and whereabouts of the Egyptian
who had given me the story on Suez.
I was startled. We had not promoted that story in
advance in the dailies. How did this man know about it?
I told him to call the Harvard Middle East Center,
which would supply him with any number of speakers for his group.
The man shouted angrily that he didn't want Harvard. He wanted "that
man." I hung up.
My editor came upstairs at this point and I told him
about the call. He then told me that someone in the linotype room
(a mole, maybe?) had read my article and alerted important Jewish
leaders, who descended on the new owner of the Post in his
office in the financial district. They threatened that if my story
ran, the Post would lose the advertising of every major and
minor retail store in downtown Boston.
The owner rushed to the Post, summoned the
editor-in-chief, my editor, and others to a meeting. "Who the
hell is this Anne Thomas?" he shouted, "and what is she
doing to this paper? "
They studied my story, every word, every comma, every
period, but they kept me in the dark while this was going on. Now,
with regret, my editor said: "You wrote an honest objective
story, Anne. But I'm no hero. I don't dare run it."
I was stunned. My newspaper was afraid. It needed
advertising. It was silenced. Now I knew why all the press was silent.
What were Israel's supporters afraid of? My story only told the
history of how the Suez Canal was built and where it was situated.
Did they fear that readers, learning this, would wonder how Israel,
Britain and France could claim that Egypt stole a canal that was
totally within Egypt's borders?
Shortly after this, my editor asked me to find and
interview two experts on the Mideast problem—a Palestinian
and an Israeli. The Palestinian's story was a tale of horror. Israel
wanted to push his people into Arab countries, but the Palestinians
wanted to be near their land. Most refused to leave the refugee
camps where they existed on seven cents a day from the U.N. for
each man, woman and child.
A couple of days after I handed in my story, my editor
somberly said he couldn't run it. The powers above had turned it
down.
"But," he said, "you can do the Israeli
side."
I refused. I said if I couldn't do both sides, I would
do none at all. I told him to send someone else. I called the rabbi
at Harvard whom I was to interview for the Israeli side and cancelled
my appointment. My editor said nothing to me and the Israeli side
was not done.
The light in my mind about the courageous American
press went out, never to be rekindled. The events that silenced
the Post propelled me on a journey to find the truth.
It was not an easy task. Arab Americans had not yet
organized associations to combat the lies printed. And, most important,
the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs had not yet
been born.
On any assignment to the United Nations or to New
York for a story, after I did my interviews, I would search for
a Palestinian. I found one on Charles Malek's staff. He was suspicious
of me at first. But I persisted until he began to trust me, and
then became my mentor. I learned that Hitler's victims, for whom
I had wept, had become victimizers themselves, creating millions
of refugees, and all with American arms and American money.
Wherever I went, I shared what I learned. I never
ceased mourning the death of our "free press," and the
obeisance of a craven Congress and government in support of injustice.
Anne Thomas
is a retired journalist and activist. |