Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, December
1997, Page 55
Cairo Communique
Attack on German Tourist Bus Bad Omen for Both Egyptian
Government and Islamic Militants
By James J. Napoli
Tens of thousands of people and hundreds of cars and
buses mill and wind through the sprawling enormity of Tahrir Square
in the center of Cairo virtually 24 hours a day, every day. But
on Thursday afternoons, which mark the end of the work week, the
crush is particularly bad.
From a short distance across the square on the afternoon
of Thursday, Sept. 18, you would hardly notice one fire-blackened
bus sitting in front of the Egyptian National Museum. You would
have had to get up pretty close to see several charred bodies still
on the floor hours after an attack on the bus by men with weapons—including
at least one gun—and home-made petrol bombs.
Nine German tourists and the Egyptian driver were
killed in the bus. Other Egyptians and foreign tourists were still
gawking at, or snapping photos of, the scene long into the aftermath
of the horrific conflagration.
"It's over, khalas! This will be the
end of tourism in Cairo," said one Egyptian man who heard the
explosion and gunfire while driving near the square at midday.
He may be right. There were some reported cancellations
by tour companies in the following week. But the more general view
is that tourism, one of Egypt's most important revenue sources,
won't be seriously harmed so long as there is not another, similar
incident very soon. Further violence against tourists now would
make it more difficult to write off this attack as just an isolated
incident instigated by a lunatic.
Government officials had been crowing about how they
had effectively brought Islamic terrorism under control in Egypt,
or at least managed to confine it to areas in the southern part
of the country. It's to their advantage now to dismiss the murders
in Tahrir Square as unconnected to any militant movement, as did
both Information Minister Safwat El-Sherif and Tourism Minister
Mamdouh El-Beltagi.
Two brothers, Saber and Mahmoud Abul-Ela Farahat,
were captured by police at the scene of the attack, the beginning
of an astonishing and constantly shifting story about what exactly
happened. Early accounts were that three or four people were involved
in the attack, and that not everyone had been captured. The latest
story is that the brothers acted alone, perhaps in response to the
action of the Israeli extremist who two months earlier had hung
up posters in the West Bank town of Hebron depicting the Prophet
Muhammad as a pig.
Saber Farahat, 32, a failed singer who had apparently
turned in frustration to religious extremism, had lived with his
family in a slum in the northeast part of Cairo called Ezbet El-Nakhl.
He was arrested four years ago for shooting to death three foreigners
and wounding three others in the five-star Semiramis Hotel only
a few blocks away from the museum where the latest massacre took
place.
No strong evidence has emerged to link any organized
militant group to the attack.
He was put into Al-Khanka mental hospital. Reports
now conflict about whether he was really insane or had only paid
for a certificate saying that he was. In any case, he had left—or
escaped from—the hospital three days before the bus attack.
State security prosecutors have since ordered the arrest of five
alleged accomplices, as well as three psychiatrists and six male
nurses at the hospital.
One early speculation was that the attack was motivated
by the recent decision of a military court to sentence four alleged
Islamic militants to death and 68 others to long prison terms for
bomb attacks on banks. Another was that the Germans were targeted
because a Berlin court had ruled in April that some Iranian leaders
were connected to the murder of four Kurdish Iranian dissidents
in the German capital in 1992.
But no strong evidence has emerged to link the two
brothers to any organized militant group in any way aside from shared,
extreme religious views. Two important militant Islamic groups in
Egypt, Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiya and Al-Jihad, have remained conspicuously
silent about the attack on the tourist bus. And it has been denounced
by the largest Islamist group, the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood.
In fact, some leaders of the Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiya
and Al-Jihad groups this past summer called for an end to violence
against the regime in order to refocus their activities against
Israel. Al-Gama'a reportedly gave up attacks against tourists after
April 1996 when 18 Greek tourists, whom the assailants believed
to be Israelis, were massacred.
Uncontrolled Passions
If the attack at the museum was not part of a larger
campaign, however, the news is not an unalloyed good for either
the Islamic groups or the government. It would illustrate in a spectacular
and bloody way that they are not entirely in control of events,
and that some of the passions abroad in Egypt cannot be easily contained
or directed.
For instance, some analysts argue that the chronic
bloodletting in Upper Egypt has more to do with a prevailing culture
of vengeance than with any organized political or religious movement.
That would help explain the stubborn persistence of violence despite
tough police crackdowns on the militants. Further, the government
is facing some dangerous economic crises in the coming months that
could feed extremism by enlarging and deepening the mood of frustration
among the poor.
Most imminent is the planned implementation this October
of Law 96 of 1992 reversing land reforms initiated by Gamal Abdel
Nasser decades ago. The controversial law would allow landlords
to renegotiate existing agricultural leases with tenants or sell
the land—essentially giving them the power to throw tenants
off land they had tilled for many years. The idea is that large
holdings in fewer hands—rather than tiny holdings in the hands
of a multitude of farmers who are slow to change—could greatly
increase crop production efficiency and export potential.
That's fine from an agribusiness point of view, but
the futures of thousands of tenant farmers and their families are
uncertain, if not bleak. Confrontations between farmers and riot
troops, attacks on government agricultural cooperatives and arrests
of peasants and political activists have already taken place ahead
of the law's going into effect.
Two areas where the violence already has turned deadly
are in the Fayoum and in Minya. Both are centers of Islamic militancy,
and the government may have no more control over the passions unleashed
there than it did over those of Saber Farahat and his brother.
James J.
Napoli teaches journalism at the American University in Cairo. |