Washington Report, December 17, 1984, Page 8
Education
MESA Condemns Blacklisting
By Phebe Marr
The Middle East Studies Association of North America (MESA), the
leading American association of scholars and professionals concerned
with the Middle East, has condemned activities of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the Anti Defamation League
of B'nai B'rith (ADL) which MESA ruled could inhibit academic freedom.
MESA's criticism, contained in a resolution approved by voice vote
and without dissent at its recent annual meeting in San Francisco,
was directed at the New England Regional Office of the ADL for circulating
on college campuses a document "listing factually inaccurate
and unsubstantiated assertions that defame specific students, teachers,
and researchers as 'pro Arab propagandists." AIPAC was criticized
for collecting "unbalanced information on students, faculty,
and other parties..." through the use of surveys.
The resolution stated: "We deplore and condemn by any individual
or organization the creation, storage, or dissemination of blacklists,
'enemy lists,' or surveys which call for boycotting individuals,
academic classes, harassment or ostracism which might create an
atmosphere of intimidation or prevent scholars from carrying out
their teaching, research, or administrative duties." It called
on the national offices of the ADL and AIPAC "to disavow and
refrain" from such activities and authorized MESA to increase
the size of its Ethics Committee to handle complaints arising from
them.
An amendment to the resolution affirmed MESA's desire to keep the
door open to these groups by encouraging "professional dialogue
among all individuals and organizations."
The AIPAC survey was first brought to MESA's attention at last
year's annual meeting., when members brought forth copies of a 12
page questionnaire that had been distributed by AIPAC to sympathetic
faculty members and students at universities nationwide. The questionnaire
which offered no definitions for phrases used asked recipients to
identify pro and anti Israel faculty members, students and organizations
on campus, and, among other things, to "name any individual
faculty who assists anti Israeli groups." Recipients were asked
to specify how this assistance was offered, and, if there were a
Middle East studies center on campus, "to elaborate on its
impact." Similar information was solicited on persons involved
in student government and the student newspaper, including guest
columnists and those who had written letters to the editor. Recipients
also were urged to suggest ways in which it anti-¥Israeli"
activities could be countered.
The responses to the questionnaire resulted in a 196 page book,
The AIPAC College Guide, Exposing the Anti Israel Campaign on
Campus, authored by Jonathan Kessler and Jeff Schwaber. It contains
profiles of 100 colleges and universities and is intended to demonstrate,
according to the authors, "how the anti Israel campaign operates."
Claiming to expose a barrage of anti Israel propaganda, the book
identified campuses where "pro Arab and PLO" speakers
were invited to speak, and cited allegedly anti Israel meetings
attended and addressed by faculty members. In almost all cases there
was no indication of what these faculty members said.
The criticism of the ADL resulted from similar profiles of organizations
and individuals in California, which were contained in a report
stamped confidential and circulated to faculty members and students
in that state. The introduction to the report said that "many
of these propagandists use their anti-Zionism as merely a guise
for their deeply felt anti-Semitism."
Like the AIPAC survey, the ADL report also was followed by a booklet,
entitled Pro Arab Propaganda in America: Vehicles and Voices,
a Handbook, published in a "first edition" in 1983.
The book profiled 31 national organizations and 34 individuals identified
as "leading individuals and organizations who have mounted
... propaganda campaigns targeted against Israel." The profiles
contained selected information about individuals, including their
ethnic background, seminars they had attended, and professional
associations to which they belonged.
The Joint Committee on the Near and Middle East of the American
Council of Learned Societies and the Social Science Research Council
also has condemned the ADL and AIPAC activities. At the same time,
the Joint Committee spoke out against actions aimed at restricting
scholars from pursuing research and travel overseas a reference
to countries and groups which make it difficult for U.S. scholars
to obtain visas, presumably because of their views.
Phebe Marr, associate professor of History at the University
of Tennessee, Knoxville, has been a member of MESA since its founding
and attended its recent meeting in San Francisco. |