DECEMBER 2000, Pages 17-18
Congress Watch
House of Representatives Condemns and Threatens
Palestinians
By Shirl McArthur
On Oct. 25 the House passed a non-binding resolution, largely symbolic
because it has not been passed by the Senate, expressing its solidarity
with Israel, condemning the Palestinian leadership for encouraging
the violence and doing little to stop it, and urging the administration
to use its veto power to prevent the U.N. Security Council from
passing “unbalanced” resolutions concerning the violence in the
Palestinian territories. Representatives Benjamin Gilman (R-NY)
and Tom Lantos (D-CA) were the primary pushers of the resolution,
but they were joined by several of Israel’s other supporters to
pass the resolution by a roll-call vote of 365-30, with 11 voting
“present” (abstaining).
Representatives John Dingell (D-MI), Jim Moran (D-VA), Nick Rahall
(D-WV), and Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) spoke out forcefully on the
floor of the House against the bill. Rahall said that, rather than
a resolution “that is rife with bias and prejudice against the Palestinian
people,” the House should be “urging both parties instead to return
to the negotiating table and help them find their way back on a
path toward peace.” He pointed out that “this resolution only helps
the extremes on both sides, those who never wanted the peace process
to succeed in the first place.” Rohrabacher stated, “America should
be an even-handed peacemaker. Our goal should be a secure Israel
living at peace with its neighbors; but…justice for the Palestinian
people has to be part of the formula.”
The 41 representatives who were smart enough to see that such a
resolution in no way serves America’s national interest, and brave
enough to withstand the wrath of the Israel lobby, were, voting
no: Reps. David Bonior (D-MI), Rick Boucher (D-VA), Bill Clay (D-MO),
Eva Clayton (D-NC), Tom Coburn (R-OK), John Conyers (D-MI), Dingell,
Chet Edwards (D-TX), Harold Ford (D-TN), Wayne Gilchrest (R-MD),
Bill Goodling (R-PA), Earl Hilliard (D-AL), John Hostettler (R-IN),
Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL), Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-MI), Dennis Kucinich
(D-OH), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Matthew Martinez (D-CA), Cynthia McKinney
(D-GA), Jack Metcalf (R-WA), Jim Moran, Ron Paul (R-TX), Donald
Payne (D-NJ), Rahall, Rohrabacher, Mark Sanford (R-SC), Jose Serrano
(D-NY), Pete Stark (D-CA), Bennie Thompson (D-MS), and Maxine Waters
(D-CA).
Abstaining were Reps. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Stephanie Tubbs Jones
(D-OH), Ray LaHood (R-IL), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Lynn Rivers (D-MI),
Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Tom Sawyer (D-OH), Vic Snyder (D-AR), John
Sununu (R-NH), Karen Thurman (D-FL), and Melvin Watt (D-NC).
Meanwhile, in the Senate, 96 legislators signed an Oct. 12 letter
to President William Clinton urging that he “express solidarity
with Israel at this critical moment…condemn the Palestinian campaign
of violence…and stand with Israel in international arenas.” The
letter concludes: “This is a very dangerous hour in the Middle East.
America’s open and abiding commitment to the security of Israel
is the surest way to see our way safely through it.” The four not
signing the letter were Sens. Spencer Abraham (R-MI), Robert Byrd
(D-WV), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Judd Gregg (R-NH).
Of the several bills introduced in the House and the Senate by
Israel’s sycophants threatening to cut off aid to a unilaterally
declared Palestinian state, one, introduced by Gilman, was passed
by the House on Sept. 26 by a roll-call vote of 385-27, with four
voting “present.” Like the resolution described above condemning
the Palestinians, this bill was only symbolic because it has not
been passed by the Senate. The 31 who either voted against the bill
or abstained were, voting no: Reps. Bonior, Julia Carson (D-IN),
Clay, Clayton, Conyers, Pat Danner (D-MO), Dingell, Hilliard, Jesse
Jackson Jr., Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX), Lee, Jim McDermott (D-WA),
McKinney, George Miller (D-CA), Moran, John Murtha (D-PA), David
Obey (D-WI), Payne, Rahall, Martin Sabo (D-MN), Serrano, Stark,
Sununu, Jim Traficant (D-OH), Waters, and Watt. Abstaining were
Reps. Michael Capuano (D-MA), DeFazio, Kucinich, and Rivers.
Secret Evidence Repeal Act Falls Short
The Secret Evidence Repeal Bill, introduced in June 1999 by Reps.
Bob Barr (R-GA), Bonior, Tom Campbell (R-CA), and Conyers, was finally
reported out of the House Judiciary Committee on Oct. 17 and placed
on the calendar for vote by the full House. Unfortunately, that
vote has not taken place as we go to press, and it is unlikely that
it will before the House adjourns—meaning the bill is dead for the
106th Congress. Furthermore, the companion bill in the Senate, introduced
by Abraham, was never acted on. However, the fact that the House
bill ultimately had 129 co-sponsors, and that the new occupant of
the White House has indicated his support for this or a similar
bill, indicates that the chances are good for the passage of a bill
repealing the use of secret evidence in immigration hearings during
the 107th Congress.
Few Surprises in Foreign Aid Bill; Lebanon Aid
Upped
Both houses of Congress finally approved on Oct. 25 the conference
report reconciling the two versions of the FY 2001 foreign aid bill.
The final version includes few surprises, with the most positive
surprise being a more than doubling of aid earmarked for Lebanon,
from last year’s $15 million to “not less than $35 million” in this
year’s bill. While several members of Congress deserve some of the
credit for this increase, a major part of the credit has to go to
Senator Abraham, who has worked all year with Senate Appropriations
subcommittee chairman Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to pin down more aid
for Lebanon.
Another positive clause, the result of an amendment inserted by
Senate Appropriations Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK), provides
that military aid estimated to be spent for Egypt during FY 2001
should be placed in an interest-bearing account for Egypt within
30 days of the passage of the bill (thus partially offsetting the
fact that all of the military aid to Israel is turned over to Israel
within 30 days).
The aid totals for Middle East countries other than Lebanon are:
Tunisia, $8.5 million in military aid; Jordan, $225 million, including
$150 million in economic aid and $75 million in military aid; Egypt,
$1.995 billion, including $695 million in economic aid and $1.3
billion in military aid; and Israel, $2.88 billion, including $840
million in economic aid, $1.98 billion in military aid and $60 million
for “refugee assistance.” (Interestingly, the House bill as reported
out of Rep. Sonny Callahan’s [R-AL] appropriations subcommittee
did not include anything for Israel’s refugee assistance. Callahan
is no doubt aware that much of Israel’s resettlement program for
immigrants involves sending them off to populate the colonies in
the West Bank and Gaza, meaning that U.S. aid helps finance Israel’s
illegal settlements construction.)
In addition, the bill earmarks $25 million “for programs benefiting
the Iraqi people.” The totals for Israel and Egypt reflect the agreement
reached a couple of years ago whereby each year Israel’s economic
aid would be reduced by $120 million, its military aid increased
by $60 million, and Egypt’s economic aid reduced by $40 million.
The other provisions affecting the Middle East were essentially
the same as in previous years, including the ones effectively renewing
the presidential waiver provision of the Middle East Peace Facilitation
Act (permitting the president to waive on national security grounds
the prohibition on official contacts between U.S. and Palestinian
officials and allowing the PLO to maintain offices in the U.S.);
prohibiting direct or indirect funding to certain countries, including
Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria; and prohibiting assistance to the Palestinian
Broadcasting Corporation. As in the past two years, the bill includes
a cap on total aid to the Middle East, this year at $5.241 billion,
$80 million less that last year—presumably reflecting the net decrease
of $100 million in aid to Israel and Egypt and the $20 million increase
in aid to Lebanon.
State Department Appropriations Bill Lacks Objectionable
Jerusalem Provisions
Last year, the conference report reconciling the two versions of
the appropriations bill for the Departments of Commerce, Justice,
and State included provisions from the Senate bill that effectively
would have amounted to U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as the capital
of Israel. Although both houses approved the conference report,
the president vetoed it for reasons unrelated to the Middle East.
Ultimately, the bill was folded along with other uncompleted bills
into an “omnibus” appropriations bill, but without the objectionable
Jerusalem provisions.
This year, the Senate version included the same three provisions
regarding Jerusalem, but they were not retained in the conference
report. Once again, although both the House and the Senate passed
the conference report, Clinton threatened to veto it for reasons
unrelated to the Middle East. As we go to press, the impasse between
the president and the Congress continues. When it eventually is
resolved, however, it is highly unlikely that the objectionable
Jerusalem provisions will be reinstated.
Rahall’s Kuwait Refugees Relief Bill Passes
House Immigration subcommittee chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) unexpectedly
withdrew his objections to the Senate amendment to Rahall’s bill
to grant immigration waivers to 150 named refugees from the Gulf
war, and the bill as amended passed the House on Oct. 24, clearing
it for the president’s signature. The amendment inserted by the
Senate Judiciary Committee deletes the provision denying preferential
immigration status to the parents, brothers, and sisters of the
named refugees.
Limited Sanctions Reform Included in Agriculture
Appropriations
The popular press has trumpeted the fact that the Agriculture appropriations
bill signed by Clinton includes a provision allowing the sale of
food and medicines to Cuba. In fact, however, the provision applies
to all countries against which the U.S. has imposed unilateral trade
embargoes, including Iran, Libya, and Sudan. Furthermore, the much-publicized
provision prohibiting U.S. banks from financing such sales applies
only to Cuba.
Shirl McArthur, a retired foreign service officer, is a consultant
based in the Washington, DC area. |