November/December 1994, Pages 113-114
Publishers' Page
A Report to Our Stockholders
Other non-profit groups don't have stockholders, but
we do. Our "common stock" holders are individual subscribers
to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. They vote
all year long with their letters, some of which are printed every
month. Our "preferred stock" holders are the members of
AET's "Choir of Angels," and the unpaid ex-diplomats and
ex-congressmen comprising our boards of advisers. Each year we report
to all of these stockholders our accomplishments to date and our
goals for the future.
Where We Stand
We've maintained since our founding, in January 1982,
that real stability in the Middle East and real security for both
Arabs and Israelis must start with an Arab-Israeli land-for-peace
settlement based upon U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, including
full Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon and the
Golan Heights and equal rights for all of the Muslim, Christian
and Jewish residents of a shared Jerusalem. We also have insisted
that only the chairman of the PLO could sign an agreement on behalf
of all Palestinians and make it stick. And we have suggested that
the dispute is not between Arabs and Israelis, but rather moderates
versus extremists in each camp. Now we include the objective of
fair and free elections to choose the Palestinian leaders to finalize
the peace with Israel. Our goal, therefore, has been the fine-tuning
of U.S. Middle East policies to support the moderates in Israel,
in the Arab states, and in the Islamic world.
Result: These proposals for bettering
U.S. relations with all Middle East countries have been characterized
as "Arabist" or "Israel bashing" by partisans
of special interests in the Middle East. But they provided the underpinning
for the principles for peace signed Sept. 13, 1993 that have generated
momentum toward a just settlement that will be hard for its opponents,
on either side, to stop.
Where Credit Is Due
Many individual activists, some organizations and
periodicals, and a few historians, journalists, religious leaders,
elected officials, civil servants and diplomats who, in former Congressman
Paul Findley's words, "dared to speak out" deserve credit
for all of the "results" listed in this report. We believe
we have significantly inspired, informed and increased people in
all of those categories, and even provided some measure of coordination
for their efforts.
A Pioneering Book
One of AET's first activities was publication in 1982
of the book A Changing Image: American Perceptions of the Arab-Israeli
Dispute. Its unique depiction of U.S. involvement from the viewpoint
of those inside the government who had devoted their public
careers to working on the problem garnered letters of praise from
former Presidents Nixon, Ford and Carter. No book on the Middle
East had ever before received letters of commendation from every
living ex-president of the United States, nor has it happened since.
Result: Points made in this popularly
written book that told the whole story from a viewpoint never before
touched upon in the U.S. mainstream media increasingly have become
the accepted version among Middle East specialists, Israel's "New
Historian" writers, and among an expanding segment of the American
public as well.
The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs
Also in 1982, AET launched the Washington Report
on Middle East Affairs as an eight-page semi-monthly newsletter
mailed on a complimentary basis to every member of Congress and
a broad list of journalists and diplomats. For two years everyone
waited for disaster to befall an informed publication that defied
U.S. media taboos by audaciously debunking what Dr. Alfred Lilienthal
has called the Middle East "myth-information" that blames
only the Arabs and never Israel or its U.S. supporters for America's
problems in the Middle East.
Result: By the time all of its "seed
money" had run out, the Washington Report had a sizable
and growing paid circulation among those very same "opinion
molders," who had become addicted to this unprecedented, but
authoritative, approach to the Middle East. It's now a 116-page
magazine.
Opening Book Markets
Because A Changing Image sold out even faster
than we could reprint it, we imported objective books on the Middle
East published in England. Quartet Books in London became the collection
point to which other British publishers would send the copies we
ordered and, twice a year, our orders of several thousand books
would be shipped to us in a sea container.
Result: Discovering such a large American
market, British publishers began bringing out U.S. editions of their
Middle East books. Then U.S. publishers brought out original books
of their own, usually after checking with us to see how many copies
we could sell through the Washington Report. When the magazine
began in 1982 there were no more than a half-dozen objective books
on modern Middle East history in print in the U.S. Today our book
catalog alone lists more than 150.
Uncovering U.S. Aid to Israel
Every year we set goals. Some years ago we sought
to make the public aware of the total of U.S. aid to Israel, a figure
that was very hard to pry out of the U.S. government and one that
never appeared in the mainstream U.S. media. We vividly recall the
first time we said on a Washington, DC radio talk show that Israel
was receiving $3 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds in that year alone.
The startled host thought we had misspoken. "You mean $300
million, don't you?" he asked. We later received a tape recording
of that show from the station engineer's booth in which, when we
explained that indeed we meant $3 billion, a voice can be heard
asking the engineer, "Did you hear what that guy just said
?" The engineer answered, "Man, that's a lot of
money."
Result: The taboo was broken, but until
about 1991 the mainstream press invariably reported only that Israel
"receives $1.2 billion in economic aid" or "Israel
receives $1.8 billion in military aid," thus avoiding revealing
the combined figure.
Blowing the Whistle on Loan Guarantees
In August 1991, a month and a half before then-President
George Bush's famous press conference on the subject, the Washington
Report published an analysis of the proposed $10 billion in
U.S. loan guarantees to Israel, pointing out that they would cost
U.S. taxpayers between $3 billion and $117 billion, depending upon
whether and how much Israel actually repaid. We refuted Israel lobby
claims that Israel "has never defaulted on a U.S. government
loan" by pointing out that in fact Israel has never repaid
a U.S. government loan. All eventually are forgiven by Congress
which, by means of the Cranston Amendment attached to every U.S.
foreign aid bill since 1984, also pays all of the interest on U.S.
loans to Israel until they are forgiven. This and additional facts
about the loan guarantees revealed for the first time in the Washington
Report eventually appeared in virtually every major U.S. newspaper,
either via paid advertisements, which most U.S. dailies accepted
only to avert public charges of censorship, or in letters from our
readers to their local editors. The Israel lobby dropped its claim
that the loan guarantees "will cost U.S. taxpayers nothing."
Result: When President Bush asked Congress
to delay consideration of loan guarantees until after the opening
of Middle East peace talks, he received support from 86 percent
of the U.S. public. The resulting shock brought down the Likud government
of Yitzhak Shamir in January 1992. In June 1992 it was replaced
by the Labor government of Yitzhak Rabin.
Platform for an AIPAC Defector
In July 1992 the Washington Report printed
an article by AIPAC defector Greg Slabodkin, who could not get a
hearing from any other U.S. publication he approached, revealing
the existence of a clandestine "opposition research" section
in AIPAC. Directed by Michael Lewis, son of "Orientalist"
Bernard Lewis, it gathers and manipulates information on "enemies
of Israel," particularly Jewish critics of Israeli policies,
which it secretly passes to rival journalists and politicians for
use in smearing those critics.
Result: Slabodkin's revelations in the
Washington Report, subsequently picked up and amplified in
other publications, became a catalyst for a series of events. One
of these was the taping by a Jewish donor, disgusted by AIPAC's
McCarthyite tactics, of boasts by AIPAC's chairman about his organization's
influence on personnel placements within the Clinton administration.
Since then, most AIPAC staff directors have been replaced and both
its chairman and vice chairman have resigned. Meanwhile, another
component of the Israel lobby in America, B'nai B'rith's Anti-Defamation
League, has been investigated and exposed for compiling and circulating
files similar to those Slabodkin described.
Upping Foreign Aid Consciousness
By 1993 the press was reporting routinely that "Israel
receives $3 billion in U.S. aid." By then, however, the total
of U.S. economic and military aid and loan guarantees to Israel
actually had reached $6.3 billion. We helped force that figure into
the public consciousness by printing 40,000 copies of a bumper sticker
containing the figure and mailing one to every subscriber, all funded
by one former U.S. foreign service officer member of AET's "Angels'
Choir."
Result: Because it took place in the
middle of the "peace process," mass mailing of the bumper
sticker is one of the most controversial things we've done. But
within days the general media description of current U.S. aid to
Israel became "in excess of $3 billion."
Increasing Library Subscriptions
Two other goals for 1994 were to increase the number
of library subscribers by getting the Washington Report "indexed"
by a major service. Regular readers don't need further briefing
on what a highly politicized battlefield public libraries, and even
university libraries, have become where Middle East affairs are
concerned.
Result: The Washington Report now
is among 1,600 periodicals indexed by the Public Affairs Information
Service, one of the most heavily used indexes in academic libraries.
Paid Washington Report library subscriptions (including accepted
donated subscriptions) now number more than 3,500. Donated subscriptions,
libraries, newsstands, and daily participation by editors and writers
in radio talk shows are the Washington Report's most important
sources of new subscribers.
Informing Voters
As in the past, the Washington Report has made
available to voters throughout the 1994 election year reports drawn
from the Federal Election Commission of how much every candidate
for Congress is taking from the 116 deceptively named pro-Israel
political action committees (PACs) AET has named publicly over the
years, and the career total of such contributions for each incumbent.
This information will be added at the end of the year to a new edition
of AET's book, Stealth PACs: Lobbying Congress for Control of
Middle East Policy.
Result: This is a continuation of an
AET project, begun in 1984, to keep voters informed of how much
everyone who has ever run for Congress has received from PACs on
all sides of Middle East-related issues since PACs were created
in 1976. A copy of each edition of AET's 200-page book Stealth
PACs, containing all of this information, goes gratis
to every member of Congress. It demonstrates to congressmen that
there now is more than one group that is deeply concerned about
their votes on foreign aid and the Middle East, and that the information
the book contains is available both to their constituents and to
their challengers.
Goals for 1995
At present, we also are compiling both an index and
the contents of our first 190 issues to make them available not
only in printed form but also on computer disks.
Result: In the future, those writing
on any aspect of U.S.-Middle East relations will have at their fingertips
not only what the standard computer reference services bring up,
but also what the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs has
reported on each subject over the previous 13 years. It should have
a discernible impact on day-to-day U.S. media interviewing and reporting
on Middle East affairs.
Involving Our Readers
The question we most frequently are asked is how the
Israeli-Palestinian agreement on principles for peace affects the
Washington Report. The answer is that it will affect the
magazine in exactly the way it affects all Americansprofoundly.
If all parties to the Oslo agreement implement it in good faith,
it can remove the problem underlying most U.S. troubles in the Middle
East. But it can exacerbate those troubles if either party seeks
special advantage, as already seems to be the case with orchestrated
calls for Arabs to lift their primary economic boycott (in addition
to the secondary and tertiary boycotts which most already have lifted)
before Israel agrees to share Jerusalem or to final borders.
The alacrity with which President Clinton, key members
of his administration and members of Congress have picked up this
demand, straight from the extremists still dominating some of Israel's
American support groups, demonstrates how much remains to be done
to educate U.S. journalists, politicians and the American public
about the promises and pitfalls in the agreement.
Beyond what we sometimes call THE problem, there are
many others. Some, like Kashmir, Bosnia, Azerbaijan, and religious
extremism, won't wait for the U.S. to finish dealing with Israel/Palestine.
The Washington Report will cover them all, now, while things
need to be done.
Our Pledge
That's our pledge to our subscribers, advisers and
donors. In return, we hope they all will continue to support us,
both with gift subscriptions to others, and with the extra donations
without which none of the accomplishments we've outlined would have
been possible.
There still are two months to make a tax-deductible
donation for 1994 by mailing your check to the American Educational
Trust Library Endowment (Federal ID #52-1460362), using the envelope
at the center of this magazine. Names of donors of $100 or more
will be printed in the next listing of AET's "Angels' Choir"
members, unless they specifically request anonymity. If you haven't
yet donated, we hope you will now. |