November/December 1993, Page 64
Islam in America
ISNA Holds 30th Annual Convention
By Greg Noakes
Some 7,000 Muslims from the U.S. and Canada gathered over Labor
Day weekend in Kansas City, MO for the 30th Annual Convention of
the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The conference's theme,
"Muslims for a Better America," was indicative of a new
phase of Islamic activity in America, with Muslims moving from their
previous concentration on their own communities or home countries
to greater involvement in improving the society around them. As
ISNA President Abdullah Idris Ali noted in his welcoming message,
Muslims are "directing their efforts to the building of a better
America, guided by the Qur'anic injunction, 'Let there arise out
of you a community inviting to all that is good, enjoining what
is right, and forbidding what is wrong. Those are the ones who are
successful."'
The convention's plenary sessions included discussions of American
Muslim demographics, public and private education and curricula
development, Islam's portrayal in the mainstream U.S. media, international
issues like Bosnia, Somalia, Kashmir and Palestine, and a far-ranging
and thought-provoking panel on "American ProblemsIslamic
Solutions." Smaller interactive workshops and focus sessions
addressed parenting, youth issues, family counseling, personal finances
and inheritance, the environment, community organization and legal
rights from Muslim perspectives.
Speakers were drawn from throughout the North American Islamic
community, while foreign diplomats and dignitaries such as Pakistan's
Khurram Murad, India's Syed Shahabudin, Algeria's Anwar Haddam,
the Sudan's Abu Bakr Chinguetti and Bosnia-Herzegovina's Nedzib
Sacirbey provided international insights. Focus sessions were led
by Muslim activists and professionals with appropriate skills and
expertise.
A first-evening convention highlight was a panel combining four
of the most prominent North American Muslim leaders entitled, "Looking
Ahead: A Vision for a Better America." Imam Warith Deen Muhammad
(son of the late Elijah Muhammad), Imam Jamil al-Amin (formerly
H. Rap Brown) of the National Community, Muhammad Yunus of the Islamic
Circle of North America (ICNA) and Abdullah Idris Ali of ISNA discussed
the need for greater unity and coordination for the ethnically,
linguistically and geographically diverse Muslim population in the
U.S. and Canada.
Warith D. Muhammad, Jamil al-Amin and the presidents of ICNA and
ISNA had previously signed the "California Islamic Declaration,"
establishing a National Shura Council designed to "discuss
matters of national and international importance in order to make
collective statements and to take appropriate collective actions.''
In Kansas City the leaders publicly pledged to further coordinate
their activities and encourage mutual consultation. Plans are underway
to combine the 1994 annual conventions of ISNA and the community
of Warith D. Muhammad, raising hopes for even greater integration
and coordination among these and other Muslim organizations in the
future. Executive Director Abdurahman Alamoudi of the American Muslim
Council noted, "It is high time for American Muslims to recognize
a national leadership. . . These are the main four grassroots organizations
within the American Muslim community necessary for the creation
of this leadership."
Aside from the scheduled sessions, the convention gathering itself
is a major annual event for American Muslims. The large numbers
of children and youth took advantage of special programs which incorporated
the "Muslims for a Better America" theme, while adults
browsed through books, videos, clothing and other items at the bazaar.
Most important, though, were the personal contacts which in many
cases extended past the convention weekend. For three days conference
participants had an opportunity to see old friends, make new acquaintances,
exchange and debate theories and methodologies, network and be part
of a virtually self-contained Muslim community. Due to the Labor
Day holiday, the downtown area near the convention center was largely
deserted except for conference participants. As they traveled between
nearby hotels and the conference, the sights and sounds were closer
to Cairo or Karachi than Kansas City!
ISNA Convention Program Director Sayyid M. Syeed described the
conference's emphasis on American society as a milestone for U.S.
and Canadian Muslims. "It is their Islamic obligation to promote
sensitivity in their own community about the social and spiritual
needs of the wider American mainstream," he said. ''American
Muslims now have the self-confidence and the resolution to be positively
involved. This convention clearly spelled out their responsibilities
not only to themselves and their community but to the larger American
society.''
Shaath Presents Peace Accord to American Muslim Leaders
The Palestine Liberation Organization's Nabil Shaath met with leaders
of the American Muslim community in Washington on Oct. 5th to present
and discuss the recent Israeli-PLO peace accord. At a meeting hosted
by the American Muslim Council, Shaath presented arguments in favor
of the accord and listened to concerns voiced by the audience, which
was made up of officials of a number of American Muslim organizations
and publications.
Shaath argued that the accord has to be viewed in terms of a history
that, from 1948 until now, has seen greater Jewish settlement, increasing
Israeli hegemony and the loss of Palestinian lands. The accord,
he noted, reverses the trend with an evacuation of Israeli troops,
the return of Arab refugees, a transfer of authority to Palestinians
and the beginning of the end of the Israeli occupation of the West
Bank and Gaza. "It's not over until we see an independent Palestinian
state and Palestinian flags over Jerusalem," Shaath said.
The PLO official warned against the escalation of predictable differences
of opinion within the Palestinian, Arab and Muslim communities into
outright conflicts. "There is nothing worse than turning from
fighting the enemy who occupied our land to fighting amongst ourselves,"
he said, adding that there would be no replacement of the Israeli
occupation with a Palestinian occupation which suppresses expressions
of opposition.
Questions about the agreement ranged from specific points about
the language of the accord to doubts about the compatibility of
a Western-style nation-state in an Islamic environment and the GNP-driven
model for Palestinian development proposed by the World Bank and
other lending organizations. Participants were concerned with the
building of Palestinian civil society, with guaranteeing freedom
of political and religious expression, and with the prospects for
final status talks, set to begin in two years. Both Shaath and his
audience agreed on the need to include all strands of Palestinian
political thinking in the discussion in order to build a consensus
on such issues as borders, Jerusalem and the right of Palestinian
return.
Shaath closed by saying that the PLO leadership had seized the
opportunity provided by the Oslo channel, pointing out that the
Washington negotiations were deadlocked and that no pressure on
the Israelis could be expected from the Clinton administration.
"What the State Department was putting on the table was trash,"
the PLO official said. "We could have stayed five more years
and not reached any agreement."
The accord "is not what we struggled for," Shaath conceded.
"We struggled for the liberation of all of Palestine. But this
is what could be achieved now, to give our people a foothold on
their land."
Many American Muslims are uneasy about the Israeli-PLO accord,
and feel that the legitimate rights and aspirations of the Palestinians
are being sold short. Others believe that, given the proper assurances
about its implementation, the accord is a good beginning for a lasting
settlement in the region. Nabil Shaath heard from both schools of
thought during his Washington meeting, and agreed to work with American
Muslims to address their problems, ease their fears and engage them
fully in the long, difficult process ahead. |