Washington Report, November 1988, Page 17
Religion and the Middle East
By the Rev. L. Humphrey Walz
Presbyterian Empathy for Arabs Derided
A resolution prodding the US government to press more effectively
for Palestinian-Israeli peace, adopted by the 1988 Presbyterian
General Assembly, gave Kansas City Times editorial
writer Steve Winn a target he seemed to relish. With a zest matching
only that of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC),
the Israeli lobby in Washington, and with some of its familiar emphases,
he faulted the Presbyterians for pointing out "the brutal nature
of Israeli responses to Palestinian protests" while "ignoring
Palestinian terrorism." He called the Presbyterian document
not evenhanded in encouraging the US to restrain Israel from mounting
"disproportionate retaliation upon other countries," while
failing "even to mention Iraq's use of poison gas."
Whether or not Winn has since studied the abundant lack of evidence
behind the Iraq gas stories and publicly modified his stance on
that issue, one of our Kansas City readers might help his global
education with a copy of page 51 of the October Washington Report
("Iraq and Iran: Rush to Judgment").
Regarding the tragic and costly Palestinian-Israeli hostilities,
earlier Presbyterian resolutions had stressed the urgency of supporting
the peace seekers who, although unsubsidized by US governmental
aid, are numerous in both camps. Since, however, it is officials
who set policies for nations, attempts have been made to discuss
related problems with the Israeli authorities. These have generally
proved unrewarding.
When, for instance, an interdenominational team of American doctors
and lawyers, with Presbyterian Arizona attorney Bates Butler as
spokesman, went to Jerusalem in July and August to investigate the
credibility of accounts of Palestinian prisoners held illegally
in unsanitary conditions at the Israeli detention camp at Keziot
in the Negev, known to its thousands of Palestinian detainees as
Ansar III, no appropriate Israeli official would meet with them,
let alone allow them to visit that desert prison. Perhaps Mr. Winn
would have better luck.
More disconcerting is Winn's use of the AIPAC formula for keeping
Jews afraid for their long-range security anywhere but in Israel
while, at the same time, deflecting corrective criticism of those
Israelis who are leading their country to economic, political, social,
and moral disaster. Quite succinctly, he stated: "Given the
long and dreadful history of Christian behavior toward Jews, Christians
should speak with more care when they tell Jews how to behave."
Expectedly, AIPAC was ecstatic and quoted Winn's editorial at length
in its August 20 Near East Report, which then went on to
suggest that the Presbyterian statement was motivated more by self-interest
than moral considerations. "There are some Arab Presbyterians
and some church institutions in the Middle East," said Near
East Report. "The resolution might have been meant to buy
them a little protection in the Arab-Islamic world at Israel's expense."
In fact, the Presbyterian statement is justified both by Christian
morality and by concern for Christians and their institutions in
the Middle East.
The Israeli invasion of south Lebanon in 1982 wrought some $3 million
in damage to the Sidon Presbyterian Boys' School where, for a century,
Muslim and Christian youth had studied and played side by side.
The sister school for girls suffered less damage but had to close
because of neighborhood devastation.
Further north, the Israeli navy in 1982 shelled the hospital of
the American University of Beirut (founded in 1866 as the Syrian
Protestant College by Congregationalists with Presbyterian backing).
This was followed shortly by the 18-hour saturation bombing of West
Beirut (which President Reagan called a "holocaust"),
which strained other church-related institutions to the limit. Beirut
University College (founded and funded by Presbyterians) turned
over its dormitories and other buildings for use as emergency shelter
for survivors. The nearby ecumenical (including Presbyterian) Near
East School of Theology transformed its facilities into a surgical
center for hundreds of casualties of all ages and both sexes. Hopefully
the reader begins to see the point.
Because Winn's attack was on a single denomination, I trust that
other churches—Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant—will
forgive me for not recounting their own ordeals along the same lines.
Several of them, incidentally, were represented at the national
Presbyterian Peacemaking Conference, held October 17 to 20, in Montreat,
NC, where the Rev. Walter Owens by led a workshop entitled "Toward
Understanding US Foreign Policy in the Middle East."
Jordan Times Hails US Interfaith Peace Efforts
Rami Khouri, editor of the Jordan Times, has commended the US Interreligious
Committee for Peace in the Middle East as "novel in one sense
and, in another sense, the culmination of 5,000 years of moral/ethical
ideas ... The example of Jews in the US supporting the Palestinians'
right of self-determination and the need for an international conference
and the example of Muslims supporting Israel's right to security
strengthens my voice in the Middle East to say extremism and violence
are not the way."
(The committee has just recently moved from New York to Greene
and Westview, Philadelphia, PA 19119.)
The Rev. L. Humphrey Walz, D.D., retired associate executive
of the Presbyterian Synod of the Northeast, is active in denominational
and ecumenical peacemaking movements. |