OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1999, page 15
Separate But Unequal
Barak’s Government Handling Jewish Settlers
With Kid Gloves Three Months After His Election
By Neve Gordon
Unlike her eight siblings, 16-year-old Ali’a al-Halsa finally snapped.
Twice the Israeli authorities had ruined her parent’s stone house,
and she had remained silent. The third time she refused to keep
calm, and on a desolate hillside in the middle of the Judean Desert,
Ali’a kicked and scratched the police who had come to destroy her
home again. For creating a nuisance and resisting arrest, she was
locked up in a military jail. She spent seven days in the slammer
before her lawyer managed to secure her release on bail.
The house which the Israeli authorities were so determined to destroy
was a tin shack with no electricity and no running water. It consisted
of just three bare rooms. This shack, however, was home to Ali’a’s
large Bedouin family, whose ancestors had resided in the area ever
since the beginning of the Ottoman Empire more than 400 years ago.
On July 14th the Israeli military, accompanied by police and a
bulldozer, again demolished the house, neither realizing nor caring
that on that very day over 200 years ago the Bastille was stormed
and the great French revolution erupted. Liberty, fraternity, and
equality were surely not on their minds.
Since 1967, Israel has reduced to rubble some 6,000 Palestinian
houses in the West Bank and Arab East Jerusalem. Over 500 of these
houses have been destroyed following the signing of the Oslo peace
accords in September 1993.
According to the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions,
the motivation for demolishing Palestinian houses is purely political.
Committee chairman Prof. Jeff Halper of Ben-Gurion University maintains
that although an elaborate system of housing regulations, laws,
and procedures has been employed to give the policy a legal justification,
the real purpose “is to confine the two million residents of the
West Bank and East Jerusalem to small, crowded, impoverished, and
disconnected bantustans.”
This strategy is used to foreclose the possibility of establishing
a viable Palestinian entity. It is employed to ensure Israeli control
even after the Palestinians have achieved some form of internal
autonomy.
One might have thought that with the change from a Likud government
openly opposed to a land-for-peace agreement with the Palestinians
to a government which has promised to resume the peace process,
Ali’a’s home would have been safe. Its demolition, however, was
no random incident.
On Aug. 11, two additional houses were destroyed just outside Jerusalem,
in a small village called Wallaja, leaving yet another 11 people
homeless. A few days later I visited the families, who had moved
into tents. I was told that in their village alone 40 houses have
been designated for destruction, while a total of 4,000 demolition
orders remain outstanding in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The orders for demolitions are signed by Interior Minister Nathan
Sharansky. This is the same Sharansky who became famous while spending
a number of years in a Soviet prison cell.
Sharansky’s former accomplishments and reputation as a freedom
fighter have not stopped him from destroying Palestinian houses
for the simple reason that his moral judgments are based upon a
two-tiered system, one morality for Jews, another for non-Jews.
But it is unfair to place the blame entirely on Sharansky’s shoulders.
After all, Prime Minister Ehud Barak is the one who, since his election
in June, has not ceased speaking about the importance of a true
and meaningful peace. Words, apparently, are one thing and deeds
are another.
During this period Barak has not only failed to stop the demolitions,
but also has done nothing about the 37 illegal Jewish settlements
that have recently been established in the West Bank. Jews confiscating
Palestinian land, ruining fields, and violating numerous laws are
handled with kid gloves, while a Bedouin family building a tin shack
in the Judean desert is handled with an iron fist.
Given this treatment it is not hard to understand why Ali’a snapped.
Her sense of justice merely echoes the teachings of the prophets
who once wandered through the desert that she calls home.
Neve Gordon writes from Jerusalem and can be reached at <ngordon@bgumail.bgu.ac.il>.
His book, Torture: Human Rights, Medical Ethics and the Case
of Israel, is available from the AET
Book Club. |