Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, October/November
1998, page 26
Election 1998
A Choice Not an Echo on the Middle East in Wyomings
Lone Congressional District
By Jan Mallery
In most congressional elections, voters are tormented
by the spectacle of both major party candidates tripping over each
other in an attempt to ingratiate themselves with the powerful (and
generous) pro-Israel lobby. Each candidate pledges full support
for the policies of the Israeli government, no matter how egregious.
Neither candidate would dare to suggest a reduction in the astronomical
level of financial aid given by the United States to Israel.
This years congressional election in Wyoming,
however, offers a refreshing change—a real choice between a typical
Israel-firster member of Congress and a challenger who
has a long history of supporting a just resolution to the Israel-Palestine
conflict.
Scott Farris, who won the Democratic Party nomination
for Wyomings lone congressional seat, is a former journalist
who has spoken out against the inequitable policies of the United
States in the Middle East.
As a political columnist for Wyomings largest
and only statewide newspaper, the Casper Star-Tribune, Farris
wrote several columns questioning the level of aid given to Israel,
particularly the unique policy that allows American citizens to
deduct donations to Israeli charities from their income tax. That
column generated from former Illinois Rep. Paul Findley an appreciative
note.
Farris, 41, has also contributed articles to the Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs, including a 1989 profile of former
Wyoming Rep. Richard Cheney and his views of the Middle East when
Cheney was named Secretary of Defense by President George Bush.
Farris has also reviewed books on the Middle East for such publications
as The Bloomsbury Review .
Farris knowledge of Middle East affairs, expressed
during a foreign policy seminar at the University of Wyoming, so
impressed the guest seminar leader, former Under secretary of State
David Newsom, that Farris was invited to participate in the 1989
Georgetown University International Leadership Seminar while Newsom
was a professor there at the Georgetown School of Foreign Service.
Farris opponent, on the other hand, two-term incumbent
Rep. Barbara Cubin, has taken the usual line of unflinching support
for even the hardest line of Israeli policies—policies a significant
number of Israeli citizens often oppose, but never the United States
Congress.
There can be no peace without recognition of
the legitimate rights of the Palestinians.
Mrs. Cubin, a Republican identified with the most conservative
wing of her party, has taken the usual all-expenses-paid junkets
to Israel, courtesy of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee
(AIPAC), has been unwavering in the support of every conceivable
form of aid to Israel, and has been a routine signatory on letters
to U.S. foreign policy officials demanding that no U.S. policy ever
run counter to the desires of Israeli hard-liners.
Farris, an aide to former Wyoming Gov. Mike Sullivan,
said that while foreign policy has not been a major theme of his
campaign this year, there is no doubt that Middle East politics
plays a role even in the American West.
I had a conversation with former Wyoming Sen.
Malcolm Wallop, for whom I interned in 1979-80, who recalled how
during his 1976 Senate campaign he had been asked once about U.S.
policy in the Middle East during a rally in a small town in north
central Wyoming, Farris said. Malcolm said he had suggested
the United States needed to be more evenhanded in its dealings between
Israel and the Arab nations of the region. That remark was buried
in a long article in the local newspaper, which had a circulation
of about 2,000.
Malcolm said he had not been in Washington a week
after his election when he was visited by a member of the Israeli
Knesset who had a copy of the newspaper article and asked Malcolm
to explain what he meant by evenhanded. Under such watchful
eyes, it is easy to see why so many officeholders and office seekers
decide the easiest course, absent any strong local voice to the
contrary, is to simply go along with the AIPAC line.
Farris said his interest in Middle East affairs dates
to his childhood. His family had lived briefly in Jordan in the
mid-1950s while his father, a career Department of Interior employee,
worked under the old Point Four program, teaching modern
farming techniques to Jordanians.
He was born a year after they returned to the States,
but we regularly reviewed slides my father took in Jordan,
Farris said. Included were photographs of Palestinian refugee
camps. I was aware very early on in my life of the tragic situation
of the Palestinian people.
Farris, who has also worked in the Catholic press as
editor of The Wyoming Catholic Register, said the Middle
East is important to U.S. interests for a variety of reasons, economic,
military and religious, and U.S. interests require the goodwill
of all the regions residents.
Supporting justice for the Palestinians does not
mean negating the security concerns of Israel, Farris said,
but real security comes only from peace. There can be no peace
without recognition of the legitimate rights of the Palestinians.
To me, this quite obviously includes the creation of an independent
Palestinian nation, side by side with Israel, as was contemplated
by the United Nations in 1948.
While assassins bullets and occasionally incompetent
leadership on all sides have made peace an elusive commodity in
the Middle East, Farris said it should not dissuade people of good
will from continuing to work to promote peace, prosperity and justice
in the region.
Most Americans blithely assume the conflict between
Jews and Arabs has been going on for thousands of years, but of
course this is not true, Farris said. The origins of
this conflict go back a hundred years, a rather short time compared
to some other world ethnic conflicts. I am optimistic about peace
because it is the only answer that makes sense. But it will come
only when we elect people willing to consider the claims on all
sides, not just those with political muscle.
Jan Mallery teaches high
school in Oregon. |