Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, October/November
1997, Pages 97-98
Point of View
The Zimmermann Telegram and the Balfour Declaration
By Shakir A. Abbas
The chain of events that culminated in the Balfour Declaration
started many years before, when it was recognized that the Ottoman
Empire (the Sick Man of Europe) was on its deathbed. Everyone, including
the Zionists, was well aware of its pending breakup. Therefore,
the factors that led eventually to the Balfour Declaration and the
partition of Palestine 30 years later were prolonged and complex.
The following is an examination of these factors in order of their
importance.
The Road to India
India was the resplendent jewel in the crown of the
British monarchy, and both Egypt and Palestine happened to be located
on the road to India. In the 19th century and the early 20th century,
members of the British ruling class thought that their control of
India was eternal and therefore it was imperative that they secure
the possession of major parts of the Middle East to maintain their
hold on the subcontinent. The British Empire at the turn of the
century was a great enterprise that covered huge masses of people
and extensive territories girdling the earth. The British proclaimed
that the sun never set on their empire, and that was no idle boast.
The imperialists ruling from London were intent on perpetuating
the empire at any cost, acutely aware of external threats posed
by countries like France, Germany and Russia. Germany was late in
getting into the game of colonization and was determined to get
its share.
India was a very profitable investment for the British.
It was a great bargain. Not only was India a source of cheap raw
materials for their industrial engine, but also a huge market for
their products. Their approach to ruling India was entirely racist
and regressive. Because of the many ethnic and religious groups
that lived on the subcontinent, the British were able to control
the population by pursuing the policy of "divide-and-rule."
The two major segments of the population, the Muslims and the Hindus,
were kept at loggerheads by sowing the seeds of conflict between
them.
Introducing the Jews into Palestine was part of the
British "divide-and-rule" policy that they have deliberately
practiced so well in many places (India, Ireland, Cyprus) and with
such tragic results. A national home for the Jews in Palestine would
help in protecting India by providing a countervailing force to
Arab nationalism, to French imperial ambitions and other unforeseen
predators. It could also help them in maintaining a permanent presence
near the Suez Canal. Unaware of the true nature of Zionism, the
British assumed all along that they could control a docile Jewish
population which would be dependent on their good will and power
to survive. Later on, the British were in for a very rude surprise
when the Jews started attacking them, blowing up their buildings,
hanging their soldiers and forcing them to give up the mandate.
Black Gold
In addition to the British concerns about India, there
was another factor at work. Although it was unknown to the people
of the region, the British were aware of the great abundance of
oil in the Middle East. Oil is a source of energy which is quite
unique in many ways. It is relatively cheap, easy to extract and
there are huge reserves in the Gulf region. Another advantage is
the ease of transportation. Being in liquid form it can be pumped
through pipes stretched over thousands of miles across deserts,
under the sea and over the frozen tundra.
Indeed, in the United States, the Rockefellers' Standard
Oil was already transforming the shape of American society, industry
and landscape by the exploitation of oil resources. Recognizing
that oil reserves are finite, the international scramble for discovering
new wells was quite fierce. The British could gain tremendous leverage
by being the premier power in the Middle East.
In the early 1900s, His Majesty's Government was already
involved with the legendary William Knox D'Arcy in exploring for
oil in Iran. The British navy, under the guidance of Winston Churchill
and Admiral John Arbuthnot Fisher, had already switched from coal
to oil as the source of energy for its ships. This was quite a gamble,
since coal was available and secure within the British Isles while
oil was located in far-away regions that needed to be conquered
and controlled. It was important for the British Empire to reconfigure
its policies in the light of its dependence on oil. Again the presence
of the Jews in the heart of Arab lands was bound to give rise to
continuous turmoil and thus enable the British to remain in the
region for a long time arbitrating the dispute.
The Second Coming of Christ
The support for Zionism sprang also from an unexpected
quarter, namely the evangelical conservative Christians who believed
very strongly in the biblical prophesy that once the Jews returned
to their ancestral home, it would be time for the Messiah to return
and convert the Jews to Christianity and establish the Kingdom of
God. For the Christians it would be the second coming of Christ
and for the Jews it will be their long-awaited and only Messiah.
Advocates of so-called Christian Zionism are well-known religious
figures in the United States who had in their heyday as many as
40 million followers. Among them are Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson,
Jimmy Swaggert, Jim Bakker, Oral Roberts and others. Recently some
of them have fallen on hard times because of defects in their moral
character and un-Christian behavior.
What is perhaps not known is that Christian Zionism
is not a recent phenomenon limited to the U.S. It had its roots
many centuries ago in Protestant countries like England, where politicians
and biblical scholars interpreted Old Testament pseudo-historical
narratives to mean that the destiny of the "Jewish race"
is to ingather in the land of Palestine. These Christian Zionists
felt bound to facilitate the process even if the Jews themselves
were not anxious to undertake this uncertain journey. In the Victorian
age, leading politicians like Anthony Shaftesbury, William Gladstone
and Henry John Palmerston believed in the legend that restoration
of Israel meant the second advent of Christ. Politicians in the
early 20th century were equally influenced by this equation. Some
of these leaders must have felt that by establishing a Jewish national
home in Palestine they would not only be doing God's work but also
getting the children of God out of their hair.
The response of the Zionists to the beneficence of the
Christian adherents of the prophesy was naturally dichotomous. They
encouraged the part about the return but were quite contemptuous
of the second part. The last thing the Jews wanted to do was convert
en masse to Christianity. However, they accepted fully and gratefully
the support of the right-wing Christian believers. Menachem Begin
was reported to have remarked sarcastically: "I tell you if
the Christian fundamentalists support us in Congress today, I will
support them when the Messiah comes tomorrow."
Other Contributing Factors
There are other less important contributing factors
that influenced the Balfour Declaration. When Winston Churchill
in 1922 expressed the opinion that it should not be thought that,
with the Balfour Declaration, Britain gave something to the Jews
for which she received nothing in return, he was probably thinking
of the road to India and Middle Eastern petroleum, and not the Zimmermann
Telegram.
The Flamboyant Welshman
The war in Europe was not going well for the Allies
in 1916, and as a result, the Asquith government of Great Britain
had to resign. It was followed by a coalition government headed
by the Liberal politician David Lloyd George. In the words of author
David Fromkin, David Lloyd George was a charming but morally lax
man.
This appointment was a great stroke of luck for the
Zionist activists, headed by Chaim Weizmann, in Great Britain. As
it happened, Lloyd George was for many years the lawyer for the
World Zionist Congress and also the lawyer for the Shell Oil Company,
headed by Marcus Samuel. In collaboration with the powerful House
of Rothschild, Marcus Samuel built an oil empire rivaling the Standard
Oil of America and the Royal Dutch Company. Whether the Lloyd George
connection with Zionism early in his career was fortuitous or a
deliberate grooming of an up-and-coming politician who would be
indebted to the Jews is not clear. I think the latter might be the
case. One must remember that a close political ally of Lloyd George
was the powerful C.P. Scott, the editor of the Manchester Guardian
and a "devout" Zionist.
In Lloyd George, the Zionists found an ideal combination
of a political opportunist who held deep religious convictions as
to the destiny of the Jews, who benefitted financially from his
association with the Zionists, and who had become a diehard colonialist
betraying his early Liberal upbringing. As prime minister at the
most critical stage of the war, Lloyd George was able to thwart
French Premier Georges Clemenceau and U.S. President Woodrow Wilson
and gain sole possession of Palestine for the benefit of Great Britain
and his Zionist associates. Without the prodding of Lloyd George,
the Balfour Declaration in its present form would not have seen
the light of day.
Fuel for the War
Early in the war, the British were desperately short
of timber, from which acetone is distilled. Acetone is the key ingredient
in the manufacturing of explosives. There was an urgent need to
develop a synthetic form of acetone to permit the war to go on.
Dr. Chaim Weizmann, an excellent chemist, was recommended by his
Zionist friends to be given responsibility for solving this problem,
despite the fact that he was a foreigner. Anxious to please the
British government and render a much-needed service, he came up
with a solution to the problem in a relatively short time. That
certainly helped his standing with government leaders and opened
a lot of doors for him in his quest for a British commitment on
the Palestine issue. This must be considered as a factor of some
importance.
Echoes of Distant Wars
There must be some faint reverberations in the British
psyche of past wars of the Crusades where they met with ignominious
defeats at the hands of the Saracens. There must have been some
gleeful rubbing of hands at the thought of payback time. Instead
of the brave Christians, it would be the surrogate Jews who would
occupy the Holy Land. A story is told of a French general who, after
the occupation of Damascus, rode to the tomb of Saladin, knocked
on the gate and reported: "Saladin, we have returned!"
Unctuous Chemist
Some credit must be given to the persuasive powers
of Chaim Weizmann and his ability to convince people of the righteousness
of his cause and his absolute belief that the Zionist pleas were
genuine and moral. Every leader he had met from Lord Arthur James
Balfour to King Feisal of Iraq to President Harry Truman was impressed
by his passion, intelligence and his personality. They seemed unable
to detect, underneath it all, the terrible injustice he was seeking
to perpetrate.
Role of Racism
This list is not complete without touching on the subject
of racism. The British for many years looked down on their brown,
black and yellow subjects as inferior and not capable of self-rule.
In a way this justified the manner in which they ran their empire.
It is ironic that they considered that as the "White Man's
Burden." To them it was not such an egregious matter that white
European Jews displaced what stay-at-home British politicians imagined
to be the few barefoot, camel-herding Arabs running about in what
they believed was an almost empty Palestine. It is also ironic that
the Zionists had the same racist philosophy. For 30 years the Zionists
discussed Palestine without enquiring about the people who already
lived there. They propagated the myth of "land without people
for people without land." |