October/November 1995, pgs. 71-72
American Jews and Israel
By Nathan Jones
Rabin Government Attacks Oslo II Critics
Polls show a majority of American Jews continue to support implementation
of the Oslo agreement, but its opponents claim opposition to the
agreement is increasing. However, the scene outside the White House
on Sept 28, while the Oslo II agreement was being signed inside
by Palestinian National Authority President Yasser Arafat and Israeli
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, provided little support for the latter
assertion. At most there were 400 demonstrators protesting the agreement,
some wearing the yellow and black colors of followers of assassinated
Arab-hater Rabbi Meir Kahane, and most of the men wearing the knitted
caps of Orthodox Judaism. (Photos on inside back cover.)
The scene was a far cry from the chaos predicted by Joseph Frager,
president of Lemaan Tzion, a New York group that supports the Jewish
West Bank settler movement. He had boasted in an interview printed
in the Washington Jewish Week of Sept. 7 that "I expect
at least 10,000 people" will turn out to protest the agreement.
The relative calm may have been the result of a counter-offensive
mounted in August and early September in the U.S. by the Rabin government.
It had been alarmed by an all-out assault against land-for-peace
agreements launched in June in Washington by Israel's opposition
Likud party. Tactics had included a barrage of fax attacks sent
by Likud leader Benyamin Netanyahu to members of the U.S. Congress,
press conferences held by Israeli generals expressing security concerns
that would result from an Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights,
and visits to Capitol Hill by delegations of rabbis from both Israel
and the United States.
Countermeasures supporting the peace negotiations included U.S.
visits by other Israeli generals supporting the Oslo II agreement
and newspaper advertisements. One dated Sept. 12 from the Israel
Policy Forum, 666 Fifth Ave., 21st Floor, New York, NY 10103 proclaimed
that "1,000 Rabbis Agree: the Peace Process Must Continue."
Purporting to speak for rabbis from 47 states and the District of
Columbia, it called on members of Congress to renew the Middle East
Peace Facilitation Act (MEPFA), which enables the U.S. government
"to assist the Palestinian Authority."
A Sept. 17 advertisement "coordinated by the American Zionist
Movement" also supported MEPFA and proclaimed: "Mr. Prime
Minister, as you continue the arduous journey to peace, know that
American Jewry stands with the Government of Israel." The 29
Jewish organizations that signed this advertisement were the American
Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, American Jewish League
for Israel, Americans for Progressive Israel-Hashomer Hatzair, Americans
for Peace Now, Anti- Defamation League, Association of Reform Zionists
of America, B'nai B'rith, B'nai Zion, Federation of Reconstructionist
Synagogues and Havurot, Givat Haviva Educational Foundation, Hadassah-The
Women's Zionist Organizations of America, Israel Policy Forum, Jewish
Labor Committee, Jewish Women International, Labor Zionist Alliance,
MERCAZ-Zionist Organization of the Conservative Movement, Na'amat
USA, National Committee for Labor Israel, National Council of Jewish
Women, National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council, New
Israel Fund, Project Nishma, The Abraham Fund, Union of American
Hebrew Congregations, United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism,
Women's League for Conservative Judaism and the World Jewish Congress.
Still another advertisment in the name of the Conference of Presidents
of Major American Jewish Organizations was dated Sept. 22 and noted
that it was "made possible in part by Max M. Fisher, Lester
Pollack and other contributors." It affirmed that "we
have always supported the efforts of the government of Israel to
achieve peace with their neighbors" and was signed by the 46
groups that are members of the conference. Included in the long
list, however, was at least one group, the Jewish Institute of National
Security (JINSA), that has been accused of sponsoring speakers working
against the Oslo II agreement.
The campaign in support of the Rabin government also was expressed
via some highly personal attacks on American Jewish opponents of
the Oslo II agreement. In an article printed in the Washington
Jewish Week of Sept. 7, national director Abraham Foxman of
the Anti-Defamation League explained his decision to leave the synagogue
in which he had been a member for more than 20 years: "When
the rabbi of my synagogue routinely spews hate and vitriol toward
the elected leaders of the state of Israel, I cannot remain silent.
When the values of civility and decency are abandoned, I cannot
be deferential. When it is mandated by the congregational leader
that there is only one set of 'authentic' Torah values, neither
I nor my family can participate in this synagogue's life...
"As a survivor of the Holocaust, I believe it is an outrage
to compare the experience of the Shoah to today's terrorism, and
to cast Israeli government leaders as willful accessories in the
shedding of Jewish blood...Remember, too, that in the recent past
we deemed it 'anti-Semitic' when anyone compared Israeli policies
in the territories with Nazi policies toward Jews... There was a
time not so long ago when the comparison between Israeli policies
in the territories and apartheid was considered unacceptable, bordering
on antiSemitism...I can no longer pray in a synagogue with a spiritual
leader who spouts such hate-filled rhetoric and who harbors such
intolerance toward others who do not share his authoritarian Torah-view."
In an even stronger article in the same issue of the Washington
Jewish Week, Israeli deputy counsul-general to the Midwest Chaim
Schacham lashed out at American Jews who attack the Oslo agreement
and accuse the Rabin goverment of "forsaking Israel."
He wrote:
"Neither the government of Israel, nor the people of Israel
who voted them into office, have forsaken the land of Israel. The
people of Israel, who have chosen this government, have lived their
lives in sacrifice for the sake of maintaining a Jewish state in
this land...The government of Israel is trying to provide the best
solution it can for the future survival of the people of Israel.
Who, then, has forsaken this land of Israel? You have! More than
any Israeli, you have voted the loudest and strongest for territorial
compromise because you have remained in the United States...
"More than half of the world's Jews remain outside of Israel
by preference. How can they then demand that the otherswho
have sacrificed so much alreadysacrifice even more, and in
the judgment of their chosen government risk their very existence
in order to hold on to every inch of the Land, all in deference
to those who don't even respect the land enough to live there? Pardon
me, but even Israelis would consider that to be chutzpah..."
Conference of Presidents Split Over Monitoring Arafat
A videotape and purported transcript of a speech Yasser Arafat
made last June 19 at Gaza's Al-Azhar University became the subject
of a dispute among members of the Conference of Presidents of Major
American Jewish Organizations. The video was circulated to Jewish
groups by the Zionist Organization of America, a right-wing group
strongly opposed to Israeli concessions for peace.
In the speech Arafat repeatedly used the Arabic word "jihad,"
which literally means struggle or holy struggle, but which opponents
of the peace process invariably translate as "holy war."
In a telephone conference call among conference members to listen
to an Aug. 7 briefing on the peace negotiations by Israeli Ambassador
to the U.S. Itamar Rabinovich, conference president Leon Levy suggested
formation of a new committee to "report and monitor" speeches
by Arafat and other Palestinian officials.
Conference executive vice chairman Malcolm Hoenlein said "there
is no need for such a committee." Later Levy said his was an
"off the cuff" suggestion and Hoenlein said they did not
discuss the idea after the conference call because "it was
dead as far as I was concerned." Interestingly, in the discussion
the idea of a monitoring committee was supported by two conference
members at opposite polls of U.S. Jewish opinion on the peace process.
They were the Zionist Organization of America, which circulated
the tape and transcript in the first place, and pro-negotiations
Peace Now, which accepted the challenge to really listen to what
Palestinians were saying, rather than accept rumors about their
statements afterward.
Israeli Police Investigating Zo Artzeinu Leaders
Israeli police are investigating leaders of the right-wing Zo Artzeinu
("This is Our Land") organization, according to the Jewish
Telegraphic Agency. The investigation followed the organization's
coordination of an Aug. 8 protest in which right-wing demonstrators
blocked roads throughout Israel during the evening rush hour.
"Freedom of expression is a basic right in a democratic regime,
but public order is also a value that must be protected," said
Attorney General Michael Ben-Yair in announcing the investigation.
Zo Artzeinu leader Rabbi Benny Alon responded that the group had
"nothing to hide."
Of more concern to Israelis was the remark by Knesset member Rehavam
Ze'evi of the extreme right-wing Moledet party during a special
Knesset session in early September that demonstrators had the right
to fire back if fired upon by Israeli police.
"If they use gas against us, we will consider it live fire
and respond accordingly," Ze'evi said. He added that if opposition
parties assume power again, there would be a "blacklist"
of police who had hit Jewish demonstrators.
Israeli police minister Moshe Shahal condemned Ze'evi's statements
as "totally inappropriate," adding: "There is a kind
of rebellion against law enforcers, to interfere with...fulfilling
their duties. Environment minister Yossi Sarid said "these
kinds of threats are exactly the sign of a totalitarian regime."
In another dispute, Likud party Knesset member Uzi Landau accused
Israeli police of not wearing their name tags so that they can beat
Jewish demonstrators without being identified. Knesset deputy Yitzhak
Levy of the National Religious Party said he had photos and testimony
showing that police officers had covered their name tags or falsely
identified themselves while breaking up a Zo Artzeinu demonstration
in late August.
Chairman Dedi Zucker of the pro-peace Meretz party, which is part
of the Labor government coalition, said he would pass the information
to Israel's attorney general.
Nathan Jones writes on political affairs from Washington, DC. |