October/November 1995, pgs. 34-36
People Watch
Richard Holbrooke, Peter Jennings Have Reliable
Middle East Sources
By Richard H. Curtiss
Alert viewers of Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke's
press conferences as he mediates a peace agreement for Bosnia have
noted his frequent comparisons of Sarajevo and divided Bosnia with
the problems in Jerusalem. There's at least one good reason. He
is married to Kati Marton, author of the recently released
book A Death in Jerusalem, describing the assassination in
August 1948 of the Swedish U.N. Mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte,
by Jewish Lehi (Stern Gang) terrorists led by a triumvirate that
included future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir.
Kati Marton is the former wife of ABC anchorman Peter Jennings,
who once was married to a Lebanese woman and who now is squiring
superstar Barbra Streisand, surely qualifying Jennings, who
used to cover the Middle East personally when he was in ABC's London
bureau, as the best informed journalist on all points of view of
the half-century dispute between Arabs and Jews.
Holbrooke may have even more Middle East insights than meet the
eye. For a time between the end of his second and the start of his
third marriage (to Marton), his girlfriend was CBS correspondent
Diane Sawyer. It was Ms. Sawyer who was named this summer
as "Deep Throat," the Washington Post's source
on Watergate doings in Richard Nixon's White House by the
late Rabbi Baruch Korff ("Nixon's Rabbi"), who
was personally involved both in Middle Eastern and in Nixon White
House affairs. Ukrainian-born Rabbi Korff had been an avid supporter
of Israel and of Sephardic Jewish communities in the Middle East
before he undertook high-profile efforts to defend Nixon against
Watergate accusations. He was a man of conscience, and for this
reason his death-bed accusation cannot easily be dismissed, even
though Sawyer, who was in the Nixon White House press office at
the time "Deep Throat" was leaking White House secrets
to the Washington Post, called them "laughable."
Yes, we've already checked: retired Washington Post executive
editor Ben Bradlee declines to identify "Deep Throat"
in his just-published book, A Good Life. Bradlee says he
and Washington Post managing editor Howard Simon and
investigative reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein
all promised that Deep Throat's identity would not be revealed
until after his, her or its death.
We say "it" because it's long been our opinion that whoever
played the role of "Deep Throat" (in real life, not the
film) was in fact only a conduit for information collected by Israel's
Mossad and used to discredit Nixon. That was because at the beginning
of his second term Nixon had signaled both orally and in writing
to then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger that having armed
Israel to the teeth during his first presidential term, he was going
to insist that Israel make peace with the Arabs in his second term.
What we did learn from discussions of Bradlee's book was
that Simons, now deceased, felt his role in Watergate was "fatally
shortchanged" in the film "All the President's Men,"
and that his relationship with Bradlee "was never the same
after the film." Simons, who was Jewish, has been credited
by both Woodward and Bernstein for giving them the time, encouragement
and backing to pursue the story that finally brought down a president
before he could do any of the politically dangerous things he had
hoped to do after being safely re-elected.
Not Middle East-relevant but intriguing nevertheless was Bradlee's
revelation that British-born Pamela Harriman, now U.S. ambassador
to France, once prevailed upon both Richard Holbrooke and Diane
Sawyer to go to Bradlee and ask that an unflattering story about
Harriman be killed. It wasn't, but perhaps losing an argument with
Bradlee gave Holbrooke some experience for winning arguments with
the former Yugoslavs.
There may someday be a Washington Report "People Watch"
column that doesn't mention convicted spy for Israel Jonathan
Jay Pollardbut not this month. While serving his life
sentence, Pollard has divorced his wife Anne, who moved to
Israel after serving part of her own sentence for assisting his
espionage. Then, supposedly, he married a pretty Canadian brunette,
Elaine Zeitz, who now has taken the name Esther Zeitz-Pollard.
(We say supposedly because although a wedding in jail seems hard
to conceal, Elaine/Esther refuses to reveal either to journalists
or to Pollard's family when or where the happy event took place.)
Now, by telephone, Pollard has fired his Washington, DC lawyer,
Nancy Luque, and has disassociated himself from two of his
most visible former supporters, president Seymour Reich of
the American Zionist Movement and chairman Amnon Dror of
the Israel Public Committee, based in Jerusalem.
"This can't possibly be Jay" (Jonathan), said Carol
Pollard, his sister, who has been conducting a 10-year campaign
to free him, but whose calls Pollard has not returned for almost
a year. Carol and Pollard's father, Notre Dame professor Morris
Pollard, have questioned whether Elaine/Esther, who has Pollard's
power of attorney, is married to him at all. They also charge that
Esther Zeitz-Pollard is disrupting years of planning to free the
former U.S. Navy counter-intelligence specialist, who pled guilty
to handing over thousands of U.S. secret documents to the Israeli
embassy in Washington, DC before he was caught and convicted in
1985. However, when he last spoke with his sister Carol, Jonathan
Pollard asked: "Have you gotten me out in 10 years? Maybe she
will."
The new and maybe Mrs. Pollard struck back at criticism from the
Pollard family, saying that her husband had learned through "reliable
sources" that when his case comes up for a parole board hearing
after he has served a full 10 years this year, the board will use
a "15-year set-aside" that would keep the case from being
reviewed for another 15 years. She said her strategy was to advise
Pollard, who has been seeking Israeli citizenship for 10 years through
"quiet channels," to go public with his request and thus
force his new country to come publicly to his defense. (Pollard
was arrested after FBI agents pursued him, his wife and their cat
to the Israeli embassy, which refused to let them take refuge inside,
forcing them back out into the street and the waiting arms of the
arresting officers.)
Unfortunately for the new strategy, Pollard did request Israeli
citizenship publicly this summer, but in late September Israeli
Minister of Immigration and Absorption Yair Tsaban turned
down the request because, although Pollard is a Jew, he does not
reside in Israel. Now, unless he's granted parole, it looks like
he won't.
Or maybe he will. According to White House spokesman Michael
McCurry, in a private meeting with President Bill Clinton
after the Sept. 28 signing ceremony, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak
Rabin asked for the early release of Pollard, and Clinton "indicated
he would review the case properly if he received a clemency petition."
While Palestinian National Authority President Yasser Arafat
and Israeli Prime Minister Rabin were shaking hands in Washington,
Jerusalem's Likud Mayor Ehud Olmert and Israeli Police Minister
Moshe Shahal were shaking their fists at PLO representative
Faisel Husseini for "establishing facts in Eastern Jerusalem."
They said that if the East Jerusalem leader, who was a member of
the Palestinian delegation to the Washington peace talks, continues
to receive foreign dignitaries in his headquarters at Orient House,
a former hotel only a block away from the American Colony Hotel,
he will have to apply for re-zoning or be closed down. Israeli authorities
already have closed three other Palestinian agencies in East Jerusalem,
and the public threats against Husseini, a relative of Yasser
Arafat, are probably a test of how the political winds are blowing
not in Orient House but in the White House, where smog sometimes
obscures the view.
President Bill Clinton's pursuit of reelection campaign funds
results in some strange guests in the White House. One who arrived
with a group of Democratic Party contributors on Sept. 15 was Swedish-born
Manfred Lehmann , who five days later received the Menachem
Begin Leadership Award from Likud USA, the U.S. branch of Israel's
hard-line opposition party. Lehmann earned the invitation with a
$40,000 donation to the Clinton election campaign in 1992. He earned
the award by denouncing the peace process and taking out a full-page
advertisement in the Jewish Week of New York on the first
anniversary of Dr. Baruch Goldstein's murder of at least
29 Muslim men and boys at prayer in Hebron in 1994. The advertisement
said "there is every reason to honor Goldstein's memory as
a Jewish patriot." Lehmann later told the press that Hillary
Clinton pronounced a verdict of "interesting" on his
account of how her speech at the world women's conference in Beijing
was an inspiration to Israel's anti-peace protestors. Lehmann also
told journalists that President Clinton listened sympathetically
to his warning that the peace process threatened Israel's existence,
but told him, "I can't undermine Rabin."
U.S. friends of Israel were jubilant when Australian-born Martin
Indyk, a former official of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC), Israel's Washington lobby, became the first Jewish
U.S. ambassador to Israel. But the same leaders of U.S. Jewish organizations
burned up the telephone lines to the White House when Indyk sent
a lesser U.S. diplomat to attend opening festivities of the 15-month-long
celebration of the "3,000th anniversary of the Jewish presence
in Jerusalem." Said executive director Malcolm Hoenlein
of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations,
who also is American executive director of Jerusalem 3,000: "There
was concern that a decision had been taken not to participate. Everyone
came up to us and asked, 'Where is your ambassador?'"
Indyk arrived in Israel early this year. If he had gone to the
Jerusalem 3,000 ceremony he might have been the only ambassador
of a major nation present. Diplomatic representatives of European
Union member countries and Canada, among others, have been ordered
not to participate in Jersalem 3,000 events, which the EU says focus
on Jewish contributions to the city at the expense of other religions.
West Bank Jewish settlers' spokesman Yechiel Leiter, a 35-year-old
native of Scranton, PA, came to the U.S. in August to launch a legal
defense fund to support the families of hundreds of Jewish settlers
Leiter says will be arrested in coming months during a widespread
civil disobedience campaign against withdrawal of Israeli forces
from the West Bank. He declined to comment on how his U.S. fund-
raising activities would differ from those of organizers for Hamas,
the Palestinian Islamist group which also opposes the peace process.
The only immediately discernible difference between Hamas and Leiter's
YESHA Council of Jewish settlements, each of which denounces on
religious grounds any territorial compromise between Israelis and
Palestinians, is that under pending anti-terrorism legislation now
before Congress, Hamas activities are expected to be outlawed, and
YESHA activities are not.
In a telephone conference with journalists from U.S. Jewish publications,
Leiter sought to compare YESHA activities with those of Martin
Luther King. His remarks echoed those of Rabbi Shlomo Riskin,
who left his New York synagogue to become chief rabbi of the West
Bank settlement of Efrat, many of whose inhabitants are immigrants
to Israel from the United States. In leading Efrat residents to
seize a nearby hilltop for another settlement, Riskin told journalists
he had marched with Dr. King in the civil rights struggle in the
American South. When journalists subsequently sought to pin down
the date and place of his association with the U.S. martyr to civil
rights, however, Rabbi Rishkin said the place was Selma, AL, but
he could not recall when or whether Dr. King actually was present
at the time.
Leiter and Riskin seemed understated, however, compared to Rabbi
Aaron Soloveitchik of Yeshiva University, who spoke at an inaugural
dinner for a new organization, Pro-Israel, at New York's Hilton
Hotel. In support of the organization's goal of keeping the land
of Israel entirely in Jewish hands, he quoted the Talmud: "If
a man comes to kill you, rise up and kill him." Emboldened
by the hearty applause elicited by his remark, the rabbi, who is
one of Yeshiva University's best known figures, continued: "Don't
be afraid that in shooting back you might kill, God forbid, women
and children. The Arabs use them as shields. Shoot!" If only
Rabbi Soloveitchik had been Alabama Sheriff Bull Connor's
spiritual adviser two generations ago, the "Solid South"
might still be just as segregated as Leiter, Riskin and the revered
Rabbi Soloveitchik hope to make Israel, Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Alleged Palestinian Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook remained
in U.S. custody at this writing, while Israeli officials reportedly
tried to build a case that would justify his extradition to Israel.
Abu Marzook, a long-time resident of Virginia, was detained when
he returned with his family from an extended visit to the Middle
East. While PNA President Arafat asked State Department Middle East
peace talks coordinator Dennis Ross to allow Abu Marzook
to be deported to a Middle Eastern country, Brooklyn Assemblyman
and wheeler dealer Dov Hikind, an outspoken Likud supporter,
also called for the U.S. to turn down Israel's extradition requestbut
for different reasons. "The sad fact," said Hikind, "is
that Israel's track record on releasing terrorists is an embarrassment."
Responding to the ferocity of such American "supporters"
of his country, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres commented
in early August, "I don't understand American Jews. They want
to sit in Brooklyn and defend Hebron and Shechem from there?"
Asked about the threat by American allies of the settlers to launch
an intifada in New York, the Israeli leader waved it aside, saying,
"They can start an intifada there, and let the American authorities
deal with it." Peres was less sanguine in discussing demonstrators
in Israel. "They are a group of people who are undermining
the democratic system and the rule of law," he said. "This
government is not only defending its own policies, but the very
rule of law and the democratic nature of Israel...They don't want
a dialogue...They say, 'In order to preserve the unity of our people,
you must do as we say.' This is not democracy."
Chinese-American human rights activist Harry Wu let both
Israel and its American friends have it in an Aug. 25 interview
with the Jewish Week of New York shortly after he arrived
back in California after yet another two-month session in a Chinese
jail. He had been criticized by friends of Israel for accusing Israel
of selling arms that help maintain in power a communist regime that
he says has imprisoned and tortured eight million of its citizens
in more than 1,000 concentration camps.
"If I were to sell high-tech military information to Hitler,
how would you feel?" Wu asked staff writer Eric Greenberg.
"If I said, 'I just want to do my job, this is just business,'
what would Israel think about me? Just like you hate Hitler's evil,
I hate the communists' evil...Just because there are no Jews in
the Chinese labor camps, you shouldn't say 'I don't care.' The Chinese
people also deserve human rights...The [Israeli] military equipment
is going to support the [Chinese] regime becoming stable."
In his Jewish Week article, Greenberg noted that "the
military relationship between the two countries has been increasing
over the years despite controversy over charges that Israel has
been illegally trading American military technology to China, either
for money or information...The Central Intelligence Agency has estimated
that it has cost China 'several billion dollars' to acquire defense
technologies from Israel from 1983 to 1993.
"In contrast, the Israeli government has estimated arms sales
to China during 1992 at a more modest $60 million. But in recent
months, defense magazines have reported that Israel has been helping
Chinese nuclear experiments by supplying measuring and monitoring
equipment. Also, the respected Jane's Defense Weekly reported
that Israel has been helping China develop an advanced submarine
and upgrade Russian-made submarines. Israel has denied the charge.
Perhaps the most controversial concern about the Israeli-Chinese
military connection are U.S. charges that Israel has been reselling
American-made military technology or armsa violation of U.S.
law."
Greenberg's Jewish Week article also quoted Prof. Duncan
Clarke of American University (see September Washington Report,
page 8) as saying: "There is widespread agreement that Israel
has not been complying with the laws on re-exporting for many years,
and one of the principal recipients has been China...It has led
to some very awkward implications. In the Persian Gulf war, according
to my sources, re-exported technology from Israel to China was put
in tanks that China sold to Saddam Hussain and used against
U.S. Marines."
Illegally re-exporting American technology to China is one thing,
of course. But let's hope Israeli arms merchants don't send any
of that stuff to the U.S. Likudniks now planning to launch "an
American intifada" against the Middle East peace process on
the sidewalks of New York.
Richard H. Curtiss is the executive editor of the Washington
Report. |