October 1991, Page 41
Special Report
Speaking About the Unspeakable: Officially Sanctioned
Torture
By Stephen J. Sosebee
The most disgusting and uncivilized human rights abuse is the use
of torture. To bind a detained prisoner and then systematically
inflict pain for the sake of extracting information, a "confession,"
or simply as punishment requires not only sadistic agents to carry
out the dirty work, but also a corrupt government and evil leaders
to authorize, or tolerate, such behavior. It is perhaps because
Israel's systematic use of torture against Palestinian political
prisoners is so reprehensible that it has not been forthrightly
exposed by the American media.
It has been difficult enough for apologists for Israel in Congress,
the media, academe, the clergy and, of course, national Jewish organizations
to ignore such barbaric actions by Israeli soldiers and settlers
as shooting unarmed civilians and children, blowing up homes, and
detaining persons without trial (to name but a few gross crimes)
over the past four years.
To have to answer for Israeli interrogators systematically beating,
occasionally raping, and regularly applying electric shocks to bound
and hooded non-resisting political prisoners is, however, an impossible
task, even for those accustomed to turning a blind eye to anything
the Israeli government does. Thus, discussion of torture in Israel
and Palestine has been avoided at all costs in the United States,
even by the otherwise progressive press and within the peace camp.
This does not, however, in any way alter the fact that the worst
types of torture are common in Israeli prisons, that dozens of Palestinian
civilians have died as a result of unspeakable physical abuse while
in detention, and that systematic torture is practiced today by
Israeli officials with the legal authorization of their government
and the full knowledge of the US government.
Like all of the human rights violations commonly inflicted against
Palestinians, torture has been used in the West Bank and Gaza not
just since the outbreak of their uprising in late 1987, but since
the start of the Israeli occupation in 1967.
In 1970, both the United Nations and Amnesty International issued
reports charging Israeli authorities with practicing torture in
the occupied territories. The International Red Cross and Israeli
lawyers also reported the use of torture in Israeli prisons in the
early and mid-1970s. In 1977, Israeli lawyer Felicia Langer wrote:
"The use of torture during investigations is a method, and
I declare it as a lawyer who has dealt with thousands of cases.
I have seen the marks of torture on the bodies of hundreds of my
clients ... I knew prisoners who went mad as a result of torture
... Many people have died in prisons as a result of torture, or
are condemned to a slow death because of the lack of medical treatment.
"
Israeli torture of Palestinian detainees became headline news in
June 1977, when the London Sunday Times printed a detailed
report which concluded that "torture of Arab prisoners is so
widespread and systematic that it cannot be dismissed as `rough
cops' exceeding orders. It appears to be sanctioned as deliberate
policy."
In a two-year period between 1977 and 1979, the US consulate in
East Jerusalem sent more than 40 cables to the State Department
reporting that torture is a common practice employed by Israelis
to extract confessions and to punish Palestinian prisoners. Documentation
of Israeli torture, deaths of Palestinians under detention, and
other abuses increased in the late 1970s. The absence of human rights
organizations in Palestine in the late 1960s and 1970s makes it
difficult to estimate the number of Palestinian prisoners who died
in prison in the early years of Israeli occupation.
In 1982, reports of torture became widespread following the Israeli
invasion and occupation of Lebanon, especially at the Ansar detention
camp. An incident in 1984, however, became the turning point in
precise documentation of torture in Israel. Majid and Subhi Abujumaa
were beaten to death by the Israeli secret police (the Shin Bet)
following a failed bus hijacking in Gaza. The truth that the cousins
were murdered during interrogation, and not during the storming
of the bus as the Israeli government had reported, only surfaced
after an Israeli newspaper printed a photograph of one of the men
being led away in handcuffs. This incident led to the Landau Commission
investigation into the practices of the Shin Bet. The Israeli Government
Commission documented the use of torture to obtain confessions from
detained Palestinians, yet none of the convictions based upon such
coerced confessions reversed.
The Landau Commission
"The use of torture is common in countries, of course,"
Gazan lawyer Sourani, who has had more than one killed in detention,
said last fall. "But government to come out and actually endorse
it with a cabinet vote is, I think, quite rare. The Israeli government
did just that it endorsed the Landau Commission recommendations,
which read as follow "The Commission agrees that the fir and
clearly delineated psychological physical pressures may legitimate]
exerted in the interrogation of I suspected of terrorism and has
proposed precise guidelines for the Shin Bet adopt."
The Commission's precise guidelines were not made public and there
are still questions as to what exactly these recommendations were.
The Landau Report also found that Shin Bet agents had commonly
used torture and then often lied about it openly in court. Israeli
cabinet members from both Likud and Labor parties, following their
endorsement of the use of "moderate physical pressure, "
also agreed not to prosecute Israeli officers who had lied in court,
although they had lied under oath in violation of Israeli law.
Clearly, the purpose of condoning "limited physical pressure"
on detained Palestinians is to extract the "confessions"
that, in the Israeli military justice system, account for some 90
percent of all convictions, according to estimates of Israeli defense
attorneys. Convictions on the basis of little or no evidence other
than such torture coerced confessions are a violation of human rights
law, which protects a suspect from being "compelled to testify
against himself, or to confess guilt."
Almost at the same time that the Israeli government was officially
endorsing the use of "limited physical pressure" on Palestinian
detainees, Awad Harridan, a 21 year-old student, died under interrogation
in Jenin prison. Though the authorities gave his family a variety
of different explanations for his death, including a snakebite,
relatives saw marks of a severe beating on his body at the time
of his burial.
Empty Lies
Israeli denials of the use of extreme torture, far exceeding any
possible definition of "moderate pressure," became empty
lies during the intifada. Even the US State Department was forced
to mention in its 1988 Annual Human Rights Report that not only
had eight Palestinians died in detention, but that Israeli authorities
often obtained "confessions" through "physical and
psychological pressure."
The most commonly reported methods of torture in the occupied territories
include starvation, sleep deprivation, hoods, beatings, humiliation,
confinement in specially constructed cells, forced standing, and
sexual harassment and abuse. There also are well documented reports
of electric shock torture, conducted usually at AlFara'a prison
near Nablus. As a result of electric shock treatment under interrogation
in 1987, Izzo AlAwawdeh still suffers from "converse blindness."
Three main categories of physical abuse against Palestinian detainees
are torture during interrogation, withholding medical treatment,
and the use of excessive force in response to demonstrations. All
three have caused deaths during the intifada.
A 1987 study by a Finnish doctor comparing the nature of torture
used against Palestinians and against South American political prisoners
found that:
"Beating of political detainees was equally common in both
groups. Cold water torture, sexual molestation, and deprivation
of food and drink were more commonly experienced by Palestinian
detainees under Israeli interrogation than by South American detainees.
The use of electric torture was more common among the South American
prisoners."
The Israelis have employed torture not only to punish or extract
information from detainees, but also as a means to influence a third
party. One example is Mahmoud Zakarner, 19, from Kabatya village.
Mahmoud had his testicles smashed in front of his uncle in an effort
to force his uncle to provide the names of those who participated
in the killing of a collaborator in February 1988. Mahmoud is now
paralyzed and unable to speak as a result.
Efforts to Stop the Torture
Revelations and endorsement of torture by the Israeli government
have prompted some Israelis to organize lobbying and information
activities in an effort to put a stop to it. One such group, the
Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, held a press conference
in West Jerusalem on April 5, 1990, condemning the Shin Bet's use
of torture during interrogation. In a statement released at that
time, the group stated that torture is a serious problem in Israel
"not just because the practice of torture is an affront to
democratic values, but also because all the procedures are systematic."
Israeli human rights groups, such as B'Tselem and the Association
for Civil Rights in Israel, also have called on the Israeli government
to stop permitting the use of torture during interrogation. Israeli
authorities have concluded, however, that extracting information
through the use of force is necessary to crush an uprising that
is both popular and widespread.
The American government and its leaders are well aware of such
Israeli practices and behavior, which have resulted in the documented
deaths of nearly two dozen detainees in prison during the intifada.
The US has refrained, however, from using its great leverage in
an effort to stop it. As a result, American taxpayers, who continue
to fund the occupation despite the reprehensible deeds carried out
to keep it in place, are witting accomplices of the interrogators
who torment bound prisoners and the Israeli government that permits
and defines this as moderate physical pressure. "
Stephen Sosebee is a free-lance writer from Kent, OH presently
living in Gaza. |