September/October 1994, Pages 36-37
Media Watch
Newsday Defends Its Middle East Coverage
By Kurt Holden
Many readers of this magazine would put the mainstream media high
on the list of what's wrong with America. Those who have first-hand
knowledge of the Middle East know how badly the public is served
when actual events in that area conflict with individual media bias
or the prevailing conventions of "pack journalism."
Articles that put Arabs or Muslims in a good light seldom
appear in the smaller daily papers or on network television. If
they appear in the larger "newspapers of record," they
are likely to be short, obscurely placed, and sometimes presented
under irrelevant headlines. The same is true of articles that put
Israel in a bad light. Articles that reflect favorably
on Israel or badly on Arabs or Muslims have a much better chance
of appearing on Page 1, and the fact that there are both moderates
and monsters in both camps seldom surfaces.
When a newspaper breaks the pattern, it can expect to hear from
its readers and advertisers, often in a highly organized and economically
threatening way. One that did was Long Island's Newsday. It
has a heavily Jewish readership, but frequently prints articles
by investigative reporter Robert Friedman. Friedman has written
an unflattering biography of the late extremist Rabbi Meir Kahane,
founder of the Jewish Defense League in the United States and the
now outlawed Kach political party in Israel. Friedman's reports
are penetrating exposes of the violence promulgated by zealots of
the JDL and its U.S. offshoots, and murderous violence and fanaticism
among some Jewish settlers in the West Bank.
A lot of Newsday readers cancelled subscriptions, but when
the pro-Israel (and deceptively named) Bi-County Political Action
Committee invited Newsday to defend itself, editorial page
editor James Klurfeld obliged. He told 20 persons who attended a
Mineola, Long Island meeting arranged by the group exactly why his
paper has insisted on presenting news some of them don't want to
read, despite publicly aired charges that the newspaper has been
"anti-Israel and anti-Semitic."
According to an account of the meeting by staff writer Meryl Ain
in the July 22-28 issue of The Jewish Week of Queens, NY,
Klurfeld described Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza
Strip as "untenable," putting in jeopardy "the Jewish
character of Israel" if it annexed the territories inhabited
by 1.8 million Muslim and Christian Palestinians.
"The birthrate in the West Bank is among the highest in the
world, and before long the majority of Israel's population would
be Arab," Klurfeld explained. "I've long felt, along with
the Newsday editorial board, that at some time Israel would
have to make a deal and get out of the West Bank. They would have
to trade land for peace."
Klurfeld described changes both among Palestinians and Israelis
since the intifada that began in December 1987. "The intifada
was aimed at the PLO as much as at Israel," Klurfeld told the
group. "Palestinians in the West Bank wanted to control their
own lives. Arafat got the message. He decided that he wanted to
live with Israel."
Newsday expressed in its editorials the view that because
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir was "too distrustful
of the Arabs (and) too limited by his tragic history," he was
not capable of making peace with the Palestinians, Klurfeld said.
The newspaper also expressed the view that Israel was wrong to risk
losing the $10 billion it was being offered in U.S. loan guarantees
by continuing to build settlements in the occupied territories.
"Building settlements made no economic sense and the more settlements
that were built, the more difficult it would be to achieve peace,"
Klurfeld said.
He told the group, according to the account in The Jewish Week,
that his newspaper took "a lot of flak" and was accused
of being "anti-Israel and anti-Semitic" because of its
editorial criticism of Shamir. Refuting the "anti-Israel"
label, he pointed out that Newsday supports Israeli Prime
Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who "showed real vision," according
to Klurfeld. "We believe the peace process ought to be supported
and we express our support for that," he added.
Responding directly to the criticism which led to his meeting with
members of the pro-Israel PAC, Klurfeld said: "You have to
look over a period of six or more years. You can't just look at
one particular story that you don't like."
Arafat's Media False Step
The first serious test of whether the new Palestine is going to
be a Western-style democracy among Arab governments, or more of
the same, came on July 29, three days short of one month after Yasser
Arafat's July 1 arrival in Gaza, not as chairman of the Palestine
Liberation Organization, but as president of the new Palestinian
National Authority. Apparently angered by reference to a special
role for King Hussein in administering Muslim shrines in Jerusalem
contained in the "Washington Declaration" ending the state
of belligerency between Jordan and Israel, Arafat lashed out at
An Nahar, an Arabic-language daily published in Jerusalem.
He ordered the newspaper, which is rumored to be subsidized by
the Jordanian government, to cease publishing. Staff members said
when they ignored the verbal order, "which came from Fatah
and the PNA," masked men appreared in the paper's Jerusalem
office and ordered the staff home.
"This has the signs of the situation you see in a police
state, rather than where the rule of law applies," said prominent
Palestinian journalist Daoud Kuttab, who was one of 37 Palestinian
journalists who signed a protest condemning the ban as "contrary
to the democratic basis that we hope to build for our society."
Former Palestinian peace talks delegation spokeswoman Hanan Ashrawi
called the ban "a clear violation of freedom of speech and
freedom of the press," and said her human rights organization
is "pursuing the case with the Palestinian National Authority."
Meanwhile, Arafat had responded on Aug. 1, "This paper has
to respect our laws. They have to get a license first from the Palestinian
National Authority." An Nahar's proprietors applied
the next day to the Palestinian Ministry of Justice for a license,
although there was no record that such a license had been issued
to Al Quds, the only other Arabic daily published in Jerusalem.
On Aug. 5, Al Quds, which supports Al Fatah, Arafat's mainstream
organization at the core of the PLO, announced it would no longer
publish Daoud Kuttab's writings because of his protest. Asked why
he had not challenged Arafat at the Aug. 1 press conference to announce
the ruling against An Nahar, Taher Shriteh, a Palestinian
journalistic hero who was imprisoned and tortured by Gaza's Israeli
occupiers, responded: "Arafat is tough and I prefer to be silent...they
could close me down or cut off my phone."
On Aug. 6, when Anis Barghouti, head of the Palestine Information
Office in Washington, was asked about the closure by Palestinian
Americans attending the annual convention of the Birzeit Society
in the national capital area, Barghouti responded that the order
was temporary and that the choice of when to reopen rested with
An Nahar's publisher.
Demonstrators Protest Indonesian Press Closures
Some 40 persons, some of them injured by police beatings, were
detained by police in Jakarta after demonstrations protesting the
closure of three weekly publications that had criticized government
officials close to President Suharto. The publications closed were
Tempo, which had become the country's foremost news magazine
since its establishment in 1971, with a circulation of 190,000;
DeTik, a tabloid newspaper whose name means a second in time;
and Editor, which was having financial troubles. The Indonesian
Information Ministry said Tempo had ignored several warnings
over its news coverage, and the other two publications were being
closed on "administrative" grounds for failure to operate
according to their licenses.
DeTik , which began publishing in February 1993, had printed
a series of articles implicating friends of Suharto and senior government
officials in a major banking scandal, and Tempo had publicized
a decision by Indonesian Technology Minister B.J. Habibie, a close
Suharto associate, to purchase 39 ships from the former East German
navy, despite opposition by senior Indonesian navy officers. The
closures are particularly significant because Indonesian radio and
television operate under tight government control, and the country's
daily newspapers are timid about criticizing the government of President
Suharto, who has held power for 25 years.
The U.S. Embassy issued a statement expressing "regret over
the Indonesian Government's decision to cancel the publishing licenses."
Diplomats said the closures were the most serious blow to freedom
of the press in decades, and would harm the international standing
of the Suharto government. President Bill Clinton is expected to
travel to Indonesia in November for a meeting with Asian and Pacific
leaders.
Kurt Holden, a retired filmmaker from Southern California, divides
his time between the U.S. and the Middle East. |