Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, September 20, 1982,
Page 6
Facts for Your Files
A Chronology of U.S.-Middle East Relations
September 3:
Following the Israeli cabinet's rejection of President Reagan's
Middle East peace initiative, U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz
said on an American television program that "It's hard for
me to believe that Israel would reject the idea of peace."
He added: "It's hard for me to believe that they (the Israelis)
would reject the pledges of support for their security that the
President gave. There are lots of things in that speech that are
extremely important. And so total rejection is a word that I don't
think is appropriate."
September 5:
U.S. Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger said in Cairo that
Egypt will receive sophisticated Hawkeye E2C reconnaissance planes.
September 5:
In reaction to the Israeli Government's announcement that ten new
settlements had been approved for the West Bank, the Reagan Administration
released a statement saying: "The United States regards the
Israeli announcement as most unwelcome. We cannot understand why
at a time when broader participation in the peace process is both
critical and possible Israel has elected to extend a pattern of
activity which erodes the confidence of all and most particularly
the inhabitants of the West Bank and Gaza...The United States position
set forth by President Reagan on Sept. 1 (calling for a freeze on
new settlements) remains and shall remain unchanged."
September 5:
When asked on an American television program if the U.S. would
use its aid to Israel as leverage on the Begin Government for greater
cooperation on President Reagan's peace proposal, U.S. Secretary
of State George Shultz said: "We don't have any plans to try
to maneuver people in a peace negotiation by talking about withholding
aid." Mr. Shultz also said that "appropriate security"
for Israel "must include the notion of a totally demilitarized
area throughout the West Bank in terms of any possible offensive
capabilities."
September 7:
Commenting on statements by senior Israeli officials on Sept. 6
that the situation in Lebanon should be settled before the talks
on Palestinian autonomy are resumed, a State Department spokesman
said that "the talks should go forward without direct relationship
to the events in Lebanon."
September 7:
U.S. State Department spokesman John Hughes said of President Reagan
and his plan for Mideast peace: "The President is very serious
and very determined. The determination is not diluted by the initial
Israeli response. The reaction of a number of other governments
has been very supportive. The President is very serious about this
and will pursue this."
September 8:
The U.S. Department of Commerce issued an export license for the
sale of six small jets to the Government of Iraq. Two of the jets
will be equipped for towing gunnery targets, two for aerial mapping,
and two will be outfitted for executives. The name of the company
negotiating the sale—worth approximately $25 million—was
not disclosed.
September 10:
The U.S. marines who helped supervise, as part of a multinational
force, the evacuation of PLO forces from Beirut, left Lebanon after
declaring that their mission had been accomplished. They had been
authorized to spend up to 30 days in Lebanon if necessary, but left
after only 16 days.
September 10:
U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz told the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee that "key elements" of the Arab League peace
plan announced September 9 in Fez, Morocco were "at considerable
variance" with President Reagan's peace initiative. He also
said that the Arab plan may implicitly recognize Israel, adding
that: "I hope that is so. If that's what it is, then it's a
step forward. It may not sound like much, but it would be a genuine
breakthrough...and very, very important."
September 16:
After Israel's drive into West Beirut, which followed the assassination
of Lebanon's president-elect Bashir Gemayel, a White House spokesman
said: "We fully support the Lebanese government's call for
the withdrawal of Israeli forces, which are in clear violation of
the cease-fire understanding to which Israel is party. There is
no justification, in our view, for Israel's continued military presence
in West Beirut and we call for an immediate pullback." |