Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, August/September
1997, pgs. 73-74
Christianity and the Middle East
Friends of Sabeel Hold Major Conference in Washington,
DC
by Rev. L. Humphrey Walz
"Jerusalem The Things That Make For Peace: An
Agenda for American Christians" was the overall theme of the
conference convened by Friends of Sabeel North America in Washington,
DC Thursday and Friday, June 5 and 6, hard on the heels of the Muslim-Christian
Dialogue conference at nearby Georgetown University. Sabeel is the
Jerusalem-based organization of Palestinian Christians which, among
other things, is responsible for the ecumenical Palestinian Liberation
Theology Center in Jerusalem.
Its programs encourage women, men and youth "to
discern what God is saying to them as their faith connects with
the often hard realities of their daily lives: occupation, violence,
discrimination and human rights violations." In dealing with
those realities, it works for justice and mutual respect and understanding
across religious community lines. Its next conference will be in
Jerusalem, Feb. 10-15, on "The Challenge of Jubilee: What Does
the Lord Require?"
The June 5-6 conference was designed particularly
for North American Christians who are working for peace through
justice in the Middle East. Both it and the Georgetown conference
welcomed participation by adherents of other faiths who are also
working for peace and justice. For general information, contact
FOS-NA at Box 4214, Ann Arbor, MI 48106; phone (evenings): (313)
665-5773.
The Thursday portion of the Sabeel conference opened
with a training session for delegates at Washington's Reformation
Lutheran Church on how to deal with legislators and government administrators
with whom advance appointments had been made. In the evening a video
produced by the Palestine Housing Rights Organization on "Jerusalem:
An Occupation Set in Stone?" was presented by its director,
Marty Rosenbluth. He and Jean Zaru, presiding clerk of the Ramallah
Friends Meeting (Quaker congregation), answered questions and led
a discussion. The evening closed with denominational groups meeting
to assess opportunities. These sessions were held, like those the
following day, at the National Presbyterian Church.
The two Friday morning sessions were on "American
Policy and the Perpetuation of Injustice." Jonathan Kuttab,
Palestinian human rights attorney, Yvonne Haddad, professor of Modern
Islamic History at Georgetown University, and Dr. Sara Roy, noted
for her books and articles on Gaza, gave their insights on the first
theme. The second was addressed by Prof. Rosemary Ruether of Garrett-Evangelical
Seminary; Fr. Elias Chacour, Melchite priest and founder of Mar
Elias School in Ibilin, Galilee; Rev. Mitri Raheb, of the Christmas
Lutheran Church in Bethlehem, and Jean Zaru.
After lunch and regional meetings the delegates spent
hours pondering the theme "Working for Justice: An Agenda for
Americans." They were led successively by Prof. Marc Ellis,
noted Jewish theologian and author; Dale Bishop, Middle East executive
of the Common Global Ministries Board; Gabriel Habib, former executive
secretary of the Middle East Council of Churches, now in New York
with the National Council of Churches; and Naim Ateek, canon at
St. George's Cathedral, Jerusalem, and president of Sabeel.
Prof. Haddad criticized Secretary of State Madeleine
Albright's description of U.S. foreign policy as "different
strokes for different folks." We penalize other nuclear countries
that don't sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Pact, but not Israel,
Haddad noted. We denounce other countries that discriminate among
their citizens on the basis of religion, but not Israel; we condemn
countries that colonize other people under an apartheid system,
but not Israel. Haddad termed "disastrous" the expected
appointment of U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk as U.S. assistant
secretary of state: what we need, she concluded, is a whole new
U.S. foreign policy team.
Attorney Kuttab pronounced the peace process completely
dead. What's needed now, he insisted, is a radical alternative that
is not political. For too long, he charged, Christians have succumbed
to the assumption that all we need to be effective is to have realizable
goals toward which to influence policymakers. We must abandon that
limited approach and, trusting in God, speak bluntly to power, even
if that means being marginalized. We must say bluntly that we do
not accept Israel as a Jewish state; that we do not accept Israeli
or Palestinian violations of human rights and that we do not accept
Israeli settlements or the apartheid system that is being put in
place in the occupied territories.
Dr. Roy offered documentation that the economies of
Gaza and the West Bank are now worse than in 1993. This is due to
Israel's border closures and its economic isolation of non-Jewish
residents of the territories. Killing local businesses also is price
fixing by 15 Palestinian monopolies all done with Israel's military
approval. The U.S. government tolerates this because some of the
money from the monopolies goes to pay the Palestinian Authority's
security forces and other social services. The PA, said Roy, has
no interest in any economic reforms that challenge Arafat's system
of patronage, just as it has no interest in challenging Israel's
policy of closure.
Prof. Ruether labeled liberal Christians "spineless"
for their failure to condemn Israel as an "ethnic-religious-racist
state." They are intimidated, she said, by liberal American
Jews. Many U.S. Christians have experienced such intimidation and
she alluded to a few but their stories are not being told. "The
story of the silencing is being silenced," she charged. Those
stories, she concluded, need to be told.
Fr. Chacour argued that what we need now is less a
"theology of liberation" than a liberation of theology,"
including a liberation from Holocaust theology. Abraham, he pointed
out, was an Iraqi goy from whom we are all descended. Preaching
liberation from theologies that permit one people to oppress another
is dangerous to one's health, as Jesus well knew. The problem today,
said Chacour, is that too many Christians want to jump from Holy
Thursday to Easter Sunday's triumph without undergoing the anguish,
penitence and transformation of the disciples on Good Friday and
Black Saturday.
Rev. Raheb spoke of the "mythology" of the
"peace process" and the "two-state solution."
Palestinians don't talk about the peace process any more, he said,
and they see the so-called "two-state solution" as simply
the legalization of apartheid.
Dr. Bishop said that, in working for durable peace,
Christians should not sacrifice the principles of justice to get
a negotiated compromise. He noted that in 1982 the framers of the
National Council of Churches Middle East Statement accepted Israel
as a "Jewish state" as a compromise to make the overall
statement more acceptable to the Jewish community. That compromise,
he confessed, was nonetheless a surrender of the principle of justice
as it applies to the non-Jewish population of Israel. So, too, with
the Oslo agreement: For the sake of a negotiated compromise and
in order not to be seen by others as obstructionists, many Christians
accepted the Oslo accords even though they represent an abandonment
of the basic principles of justice for the Palestinians as embodied
in U.N. resolutions.
MECC Issues Iraq Report
Back in 1991, when Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussain had
for too long been directing his military and economic resources
to the domination or destruction of rival oil-rich Gulf countries,
the U.S. led the military coalition to try to shoot and bomb him
out of occupied Kuwait. They missed him but destroyed, among other
things, the Tigris-Euphrates bridges and water systems and other
infrastructure essential to the industrial, agricultural, commercial
and general economic wellbeing of once healthy and prosperous Iraq.
The fact that Saddam Hussain remained in power even after his army
was "grievously ejected" from Kuwait has led, instead,
to a six-year embargo to starve his people into a possible insurrection,
of which they are less and less capable.
Consequently, as writer Robert Hazo put it in an article
in the January 1997 issue of this magazine, "What the Iraqi
people have been suffering is a continuing hell on earth."
Carol Bellamy, head of U.N. Children's Relief, put it a bit more
specifically when she stated that in Iraq "approximately 4,500
children under the age of five die every month from hunger and disease."
Altogether, added Hazo, as many as 100,000 Iraqis "may be dying
every year for lack of food and medicine." The pollution of
drinking water also has been a contributing factor.
The Middle East Council of Churches (MECC) is struggling
to devise ways in which its member congregations can help the Iraqi
churches struggle through their related crises. Among other things
it sent a delegation to interview church leaders inside Iraq to
try to assess the nature of the problems and devise initial solutions.
The most recent MECC NewsReport, a bi-monthly magazine with a format
and journalistic style comparable to Time or Newsweek, gives excerpts
from statements by four of those leaders, from which we have extracted
the following:
Avak Asadourian, prelate of the Diocese of the Armenian
Church of Iraq, responded, in part:
"The embargo and sanctions against Iraq over
the last 6 years have created a problem of security actually, a
lack of security, a lack of work and a lack of basic human necessities.
These three have combined and have forced the people or some of
them to leave the country. This involves Christian and Muslim populations
alike in Iraq.
"It has created a vacuum in our diocese because
our people get involved in the affairs of the church and we grow
from their abilities. Now we don't have that many young people to
help us work for them for their spiritual and human needs.
"The country as a whole is experiencing a brain
drain. Many of the university professors have taken jobs in countries
around Iraq. Many of the good doctors have left the country, which
depletes the services available...."
Father Louis Shabi of the St. Joseph Chaldean Church
in Baghdad noted further:
"We have many different activities in our church
to try to help our people during these difficult times. We also
do a lot of visitation with the sick men and women of our parish.
There are many refugees in the country and we try to help as many
as we can, both Christian and Muslim.
"Before the war, the situation was very very
good and there were very few poor people in Iraq. Now the majority
of the population is poor....
"My biggest hope for the future is that God will
give us peace and security. I want to be freed from these material
issues..."
Syrian Orthodox Archbishop Severius Hawa of Baghdad
and Basra added:
"We are making a big effort to improve the economic
situation of the needy families. In general, the standard of living
has fallen and we need to try to limit this trend.
"We have felt believers drawing nearer to the
Church in the recent moments of crisis. They seem to be drawn to
the fellowship and to their beliefs.
"As far as relations are concerned, Christian-Muslim
relationships vary from one person to another. Some people have
good relationships. Some do not because of their links to work.
There has been no change in these relations since the war. Generally
we have no problems living alongside the Muslim community."
Archbishop Gewargis Sliwa of the Church of the East
in Iraq emphasized:
"Our biggest challenge has been taking care of
the children. They are suffering from a lack of food and medicine
and in the future if they grow up in this situation they will face
many difficulties if they don't have the necessities of life.
"The other thing is that as a church we have
a very important duty toward those who were raised during this situation,
starting in 1980 during the beginning of the Iran/Iraq war and then
again after the sanctions. Those who came to life during this time
are now about 18-19 years old. So the church has work to do from
a psychological point of view. It's not just an issue of food and
clothing, but how to take care of these human beings. That's a very
big job really.
"Besides all of this, as a church we have so
many projects to do which we cannot do because of the sanctions.
We have had to cancel them all because it is not a suitable time
for people to give donations to the church." |