Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, August/September
1997, pg. 46
Trade and Finance
IMF Assesses Palestinian Economic Potential
by Colin MacKinnon
"We've had deterioration in many ways in the
last two or three years, but on the other hand, the economy does
have potential," says Milan Zavadjil, an economist with the
International Monetary Fund and lead author of a recent, basically
somber, IMF report on the West Bank and Gaza and Palestine's economic
prospects.* "It has an open trading relationship with IsraelIsrael
can generate a lot of demand for Palestinian goods. The population
of the Palestinian territory is comparatively well-educated and
there's lots of entrepreneurial talent. There's also a banking system
that is very liquid, that can potentially supply a lot of funds.
"These are all positives for the future, if this
on-off system of border closures is lifted," says Zavadjil.
"At the moment, Palestinian employment in Israel is exceeding
50,000, which is another positive."
1996 a Year of Gloom
Last year was indeed a bad one in the Palestinian
territory. The borders to Israel were sealed off much of the time.
The closure drastically cut the number of Palestinians working in
Israel, disrupted trade, delayed projects, and generally weakened
investor confidence, both Palestinian and foreign.
By the second half of 1996, per capita income was
20 percent lower than in 1993 (the year the Oslo accords were signed),
unemployment was 16 percent higher, and private investment had fallen
after a construction boom in the previous two years.
Not everything was negative. Despite the revenue losses
caused by the border closures (and the costs of getting an administration
going), the Palestinian Authority (PA) kept its budget deficit in
bounds 3.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product. While PA wages were
higher than expected, revenues were also over target, by 21 percent.
The IMF gives the PA high marks for improving tax collection and
for being able to prioritize expenditures during difficult times.
Another positive last year: the banking system expanded
strongly. Despite the political and other uncertainties, the banking
system saw sharply higher deposits and net foreign assets. Deposits
increased some $550 million during 1996. There's a down side here,
since domestic loans increased by less than a fourth of that amount.
People are putting money in local banks now, which is good, but
are not borrowing it for investment, which is bad. Still, there's
a great deal of money sitting right now in Palestinian banks ready
to finance investment.
The economy rebounded in the latter part of 1996 and
this year, says Zavadjil, the economy is showing signs of further
improvement.
"The numbers are turning out a little better
than anticipated in the report," says Zavadjil. "It seems
that the average number of workers [working in Israel] could be
above 35,000, from developments we have seen that run through the
end of May. So this is positive. Goods seem to be flowing, too.
There are still difficulties, but they seem to be flowing."
The IMF and the Palestinian Authority
The IMF has been a quiet but effective force in constructing
the Palestinian Authority's financial administration. Like the World
Bank, the Fund was established just after World War II. Its original
function was to promote international monetary harmony by monitoring
the exchange rates and monetary policies of member nations and by
bailing out members when they got into balance-of-payments trouble.
Over time the Fund has taken on a reformist role and
now presses governments to liberalize their trade, tax and investment
regimes.
The Fund also has a research function and gives advice
to member governments. The Palestinian Authority is not a member,
and so the IMF has restricted itself to giving "technical assistance"
mostly advice. In the beginning, the PA needed help in setting up
key economic and financial institutions, especially the Ministry
of Finance and the Palestinian Monetary Authority, and the Fund
sent advisers to help it do so.
Since then the Fund has helped the PA in a variety
of areas: revenue administration, expenditure management, reforming
the pension system, banking management, and compilation of statistics,
and has given advice on formulating macroeconomic policy. Fund staffers
have helped Palestinian officials prepare their budgets, monitor
budgetary performance, report to donors, and look for capital.
What the PA Will Do
Here are some of the policies the IMF thinks the PA
will or should follow in the coming months.
- Tackle unemployment. This will be the main aim of the PA.
One-third of Palestinians are unemployed. The labor force,
like the population, is growing at 4 percent a year. If
the Palestinian territories don't see strong economic growth,
unemployment will rise. That means investment will have
to rise from its current level of 18-19 percent. The PA
won't be able to do this with donor money; there just isn't
enough around. Somehow or other, the PA will have to attract
private investment.
- Increase savings and investment. The PA will have to introduce
structural changes to increase investment and savings. The
IMF, as always, recommends a tight fiscal policy to promote
private-sector activity and confidence. Deficits should
be kept low in 1997 and 1998, and down the line the PA should
try to run surpluses.
- Improve tax collection and administration. The basic tax
collection structure is in place, and the PA can now focus
on enforcement. A major step forward, says Zavadjil, has
been the creation of investigative units that will focus
on large taxpayers, many of whom have been getting past
the tax authorities. This should help tax collection, including
the VAT. The Ministry of Finance was supposed to centralize
under its authority all revenue collection, expenditure
and external financing by March 1 this year. That hasn't
happened. Supposedly all the preparations are ready, though,
and Palestinian administrators say they will do it shortly.
- Increase exports. The PA should encourage production of
exportable goods and services. This means reform of all
the laws that regulate private-sector activity. Whether
the PA will manage to reform its investment code remains
to be seen. Critics see the code currently in use, which
has never been legally promulgated, as a throw-back to a
period when developing countries were often hostile to foreign
capital. "It's a Nasserite document," says one
World Bank expert. "If you want to discourage foreign
investment, this code is how you do it."
- Dismantle the PA's pernicious system of import monopolies.
Fat cats and cronies are doing well by having exclusive
control over imports of such commodities as petroleum, cement,
tobacco and electronic products. This system should be ended.
Palestinian officials have repeatedly told the Fund that
the monopolies will be eliminated by 1998. Maybe they will.
- Finally, go after donors. In November last year donors
pledged another $880 million to support the PA's public
investment program. To turn those pledges into reality,
the PA will have to follow up by proposing and designing
projects and doing other preparatory work.
Outlook
The IMF hopes for a modest recovery in Palestinian
exports and private investment this year. Real GDP is projected
to rise 5 or 6 percent this year and unemployment should fall to
31 percent or so, still very high. The PA will restrain its current
budget even after hiring 3,000 new policemen and 3,700 new teachers
and health personnel.
All this is modest of course, and as the IMF report
stresses again and again, even such modest gains depend on the touchy
Israeli-Palestinian political climate. More border closures or some
kind of long-lasting disruption in public order in Gaza or the West
Bank could send Palestine's fragile economy spinning downward again.
*Recent Economic Developments, Prospects, and Progress
in Institution Building in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, IMF, Washington,
DC, 1997. |