August 1988, Page 18
Candidate Watch
Palestinian Self Determination: Missing Plank in the Platform
The second night of the Democratic Party's national convention
in Atlanta was the Rev. Jesse Jackson's, and before it was over
there wasn't a dry eye in the house. The convention hall seats 16,000
people, but even before Jackson arrived to make his speech, it was
filled to overflowing. Everyone wanted to be present for the emotional
highlight of the three-day session, and when fire marshals closed
the doors, many national Democratic party and civil rights notables
found themselves locked out of an event that some had traveled thousands
of miles to see.
Jackson lived up to his reputation as America's most stirring orator.
As the television cameras moved from one ecstatic, rapt, or tear-stained
face to another, each reflecting a different thread in the colorful
American ethnic quilt, Jackson's moment in the national spotlight
was one that no American who saw it will ever forget.
For Americans middle-aged or older, just the sight of a black man,
born in a southern shanty to a housemaid, being introduced to a
national television audience by his rive well-dressed, well-spoken,
well-educated children symbolized how far their country had come
in one lifetime. For younger Americans, Jackson articulated ideals
held in common. Yes to education; no to drugs. Yes to the environment,
no to despoliation. Yes to economic justice, no to economic exploitation.
Yes to peace, no to war.
Jackson's Message of Hope
For his own special constituency, the underprivileged and the underpaid,
Jackson's was a message of hope. No matter who you are or where
you are, you can be better. You can make it. It's no tragedy to
fall short of achieving personal goals. The only tragedy is to have
no goals.
For all, it was a moment of catharsis: Americans, no matter how
diverse, can find common ground. No matter whether their ancestors
came to the new world in an immigrant ship or a slave ship, they're
all in the same boat.
A descendent of Americans who came in a slave ship was articulating
as clearly and as passionately as it had ever been expressed the
vision of America's founding fathers: Americans can be better; America
will be better.
If the speech, on prime time national television, was a moment
of national catharsis, history was also made on that second day
of the convention—out of the spotlight and not on prime time.
Delegates on the convention floor, and an audience for the public
affairs channel of cable television, heard—for the first time
in a major American political convention—a debate on Palestinian
self-determination.
The fix was in from the beginning. Jackson had never wavered in
his two-tiered Middle East policy: security for Israel, self-determination
for the Palestinians. In short, the two-state solution. Nor did
Dukakis pander to Jewish voters as did all of the other Democratic
candidates still viable by the time the New York primary election
was held. But Dukakis didn't want anything in his party platform
that would alienate American supporters of Israel.
Like it or not, Jewish donors and the labor movement are the two
financial pillars of the Democratic party. And Dukakis, with a Jewish
wife and Jewish advisers, knew as well as anyone else how important
pro-Israel donations are to an election campaign. Money buys television
time. Television time buys name recognition. Name recognition translates
into votes.
So, the deal worked out was that Jesse Jackson's supporters, a
significant bloc of whom were Arab Americans, would be allowed to
bring up the issues of Palestinian statehood, along with a lot of
other Jackson issues, but that the Palestinian self-determination
issue would not be put to a vote, and therefore would not get into
the party platform. The issue was introduced by James Zogby, president
of the Arab-American Institute and a passionate activist for peace
who has devoted recent years to educating Jackson and other mainstream
American political leaders about the Palestine problem. What was
not on the schedule was the enthusiasm with which Zogby's speech
was received by delegates on the floor.
Arguments Against the Plank
The case against including Palestinian self-determination in the
platform was then presented by Sen. Daniel Inouye from Hawaii who,
as a young man, sold bonds for Israel, considered converting to
Judaism, and then learned that he could be much more valuable to
Israel as a Christian and certified war hero who lost an arm in
World War II combat. It was he who made a lightning trip, which
he's never admitted, to Israel just before officiating at the Iran-contra
hearings. It was he who changed the subject whenever the testimony
began to point to Israel as the source of the most scandalous, and
stupid, foreign policy initiative in American history—ransoming
American hostages in Lebanon by allowing the Israelis to sell American
weapons to the Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran. And it is he who helps
Israel obtain billions of US taxpayer dollars annually.
Inouye, still Israel's most obedient servant, tried to present
the Palestinian self-determination issue as contrary to American
interests. To his consternation, he was roundly, soundly, and repeatedly
booed from the floor. The clamor of rejection was so strong that
sergeants-at-arms and delegation leaders had to keep shushing the
delegates. After all, the fix was in. This issue was not going to
come to a vote.
There was another speaker for the Palestinian self-determination
plank Mervyn Dymally, an articulate and erudite black congressmen
from southern California. Again, cheers and rapt attention. And
there was another speaker against the plank, Charles E. Schumer,
a Jewish congressman from New York. Again, catcalls and such raucous
booing that delegation heads had to stop proceedings to get members
in line.
Majority of Delegates Favored Palestinian Self-Determination
The issue was not brought to a vote. But pollsters moved around
the floor and, to the horror of Israel's Democratic claque at the
convention, their findings soon found their way onto national news
programs. Seventy percent of the delegates on the floor, pollsters
found, supported inclusion of self-determination for the Palestinians
in the party platform. An interviewer for Cable News Network, moving
from delegate to delegate, asked if there was anything that had
disappointed them so far. Several in a row cited omission of the
Palestinian plank from the party platform.
Most dramatic, perhaps, was Zogby's appearance at the end of a
long day on "Crossfire," a televised Cable News Network
program co-hosted by arch conservative Pat Buchanan, and super liberal
Tom Braden. Braden took Zogby to task for not forcing the Palestinian
plank to a vote. Buchanan cited the 70 percent delegate support
revealed by the informal poll.
Zogby's response was simple and to the point. "We don't need
a vote," he said. "We'll carry on. This is a beginning,
not an end."
It wasn't quite the last word, however. The next day the Washington
Post revealed the names of 44 "managing trustees" of the
Democratic Party Victory Fund, each of whom had made a commitment
to raise $500,000 for the fund before election day. There was also
a list of 197 additional donors pledged to raise $100,000 each.
These pledges, along with previous efforts by the fund, might mean
that the Democratic Dukakis campaign would be as well-funded as
the Republican Bush campaign, a notable departure from past history.
Outspending the Republicans
Peter G. Kelly, former Democratic National Committee finance chairman
and now one of the half million dollar "managing trustees"
told the Post: "I figure that in 1980 we got outspent by 16
to 1, in 1984 by about two to one. This year, my guess is we may
be able to outspend the Republicans."
Reading names of the donors helped explain why Palestinian self
determination never made it to the Democratic Party platform. It
doesn't explain, however, how it's going to be kept out of the hearts
and minds of all American voters who agree with the words of Jesse
Jackson in his memorable speech that support for self determination
and human rights for all is the right thing, the decent thing, and
a vital part of the "common ground" that all Americans
must share. |