Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, July/August
1999, pages 6-13
Five Aspects of the Kosovo War
India-Pakistan War Of 1971 a Precedent For NATO and
Yugoslavia
By Andrew I. Killgore
A columnist friend in Texas for whom I have great affection
wrote that NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia was “plain illegal.” He
made his best argument, but from my point of view the 1971 India-Pakistan
war provided a much better precedent for what happened in Europe
in April and May.
In early 1971 Pakistani army units in East Pakistan, made up almost
exclusively of officers and men from West Pakistan, began a brutal
crackdown against the overwhelmingly Bengali population of East
Pakistan. Most of my professor/writer/journalist/entrepreneur friends
in the East Pakistan capital of Dhaka, where I had been assigned
for three years, from mid-1967 to mid-1970, were “disappeared,”
and up to 10 million Bengalis fled for safety into adjacent India.
This titanic mass of humanity overwhelmed roads, housing, communications
and everything else in the affected areas of India, and New Delhi
decided it could not accept what amounted to an aggression against
itself.
It ordered into East Pakistan the vastly larger Indian army, which
quickly defeated the outnumbered Pakistani military units, and the
millions of Bengali refugees started returning home. The West Pakistan
troops, the source of the brutality against the Bengalis, were withdrawn
forever, and East Pakistan became independent Bangladesh.
What Yugoslav President Slobodon Milosevic did to the Kosovars
resembles what the Pakistan army did to the Bengalis, except that
news accounts say well over half of the 1.8 million mostly Muslim
Kosovar Albanians were “ethnically cleansed.” While many Kosovars
hid in the mountains of their own country, perhaps 800,000 fled
into the neighboring independent nations of Albania and Macedonia,
and overwhelmed facilities in both places, particularly in ethnically
unstable Macedonia.
While countries from all over Europe and the Middle East sent relief
supplies and workers, the United States, Germany, Canada, Britain,
Turkey and many other nations also helped to ease the burden by
temporarily airlifting thousands of Kosovar refugees to their own
countries.
Now with the hostilities seemingly ended, the Kosovars will return
to their homes as soon as the Yugoslav army and police units in
Kosovo, like the Pakistani army units in East Pakistan, are replaced
by a NATO military force in which the refugees have confidence.
Whether the Kosovar Albanian majority (which was 90 percent of
the Kosovo population before the ethnic cleansing began) can ever
live peacefully in some kind of autonomy in Kosovo, side by side
with the Serbs after all the brutality they have suffered at the
hands of Belgrade, remains to be seen. Much may depend on what has
happened to the thousands of Kosovar men who were separated from
their fleeing families and held by the Serbs. Unfortunately, in
the case of East Pakistan, some of the worst fears of mass slaughter
were confirmed.
Whether NATO’s action against Yugoslavia was “legal” or not, the
nightly television footage from Macedonia and Albania of suffering
Kosovar families fleeing from their country with little more than
the clothes on their backs was too compelling to permit doing nothing
to stop it.
The United States tried twice in the 20th century to stay out of
Europe’s wars. Twice we failed. If the U.S. had entered earlier,
World War I might have ended much earlier, and without such an unjust
peace. Then World War II might not have happened at all. But if
it did, and again the U.S. had entered earlier, the worst horrors
of its final year would certainly have been prevented.
At present the United States and Europe are safely tied together
by NATO. If NATO had let Milosevic win in Kosovo, however, it would
have been the end of that alliance, and ultimately the cutting of
the military tie between the U.S. and Canada on the one hand, and
Europe on the other. In the absence of such a tie, a fractured Europe
with its fissiparous tendencies might soon be headed down the well-worn
fratricidal path that made the 20th century there such a blood-soaked
horror.
Andrew I. Killgore is the publisher of the Washington Report. |