Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, July/August 1998,
Page 19
Three Views
MUSHROOM CLOUDS OVER SOUTH ASIA
An Indian Diplomat
Most Indians Are as Critical Of Hindu Jingoism
as Are People Outside
By Kuldip Nayar
An unfortunate fallout of the tests at Pokharan is
the contorted image that India has come to acquire. Very few are
talking about the countrys traditional values, or its spiritual
heritage. It is now being seen in the worst possible light as a
Hindu fundamentalist state out to silence critics within the country
and around the world.
The fact is that the BJP has only 180 seats in the
543-member Lok Sabha, the lower house of parliament. Without consulting
the other 100 who give the BJP a majority in the House, the party
has hijacked the many strands of conciliation and tolerance. What
the Rashtriya Sewak Sang-backed BJP is projecting is an aggressiveness
which is alien to the country. BJP is not India and India is not
just the BJP.
It, is, however, unfortunate that the world, barring
a few countries, is beginning to perceive India as any other fundamentalist
state which will go to any lengths to justify its chauvinism. Comments
by the West, thoroughly irresponsible, suggest that India, a Hindu-majority
state, has exploded the bomb to create awe in the rest of the world.
They castigate New Delhi for finding a novel way of bombing their
way into the Security Council.
On top of that, when Home Minister L.K. Advani suggests
a new situation in Kashmir after the bomb, and when the prime ministers
political adviser, Pramod Mahajan, provokes China, international
opinion cannot make sense of such rhetoric. It begins to infer that
the BJP-led coalition is itching for a fight.
Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee is considered
a liberal who is opposed to Hindu fundamentalism and war-like postures.
But it appears that he has no control over ministers like Advani.
The very fact that Pramod Mahajan denies any difference between
the prime minister and the home minister confirms the impression
that the two do not see eye to eye.
Things may have changed now, but the two have been
poles apart
It is Vajpayee who was projected by the BJP as
the prime minister during the Lok Sabha polls. The message was that,
given a chance, the BJP will rise above obscurantist views and give
the country a secular, not Hindu, government. The 13 parties had
given their support to Vajpayee, not Advani or the other hard-liners.
Were the prime minister now to take a back seat, that would amount
to violating the confidence of voters and allied parties.
Vajpayee should at least shut up the lunatic fringe
of Hindu fundamentalists, like Vishva Hindu Parishad, which gets
its blessings from the RSS. Ashok Singhal, heading the Parishad,
has advocated the establishment of Hindu Raj in India and a war
against Pakistan. India is not a Hindu state. Neither its constitutions
nor its functioning point to such a narrow denominational attitude.
After partition in August 1947 India, with 82 percent
of Hindus, could have declared itself as a Hindu state. But the
national struggle, including leaders like Gandhi, Nehru, Maulana
Azad and Abdul Ghaffar Khan, had a free, democratic and secular
India as its goal, The creation of such a state after independence
was logical and met the ethos of the fight for independence.
The West and other countries are equating India with
the BJP-led coalition. Most Indians are as critical of Hindu jingoism
as the people outside, Their abuses and provocative observations
may drive Indians to the wall where they may be forced to say: good
or bad, it is my country. Do not treat it as a pariah because that
would be counter-productive.
New Delhi, somewhat better in its pronouncements than
before, cannot take other countries for granted. Washington, however
arrogant in its attitude, has real fears because Indias tests
can lead to Iran, Israel and some others making their nuclear options
explicit. The entire effort to restrain nations from going nuclear
has come to naught.
Given the history of relations between India and Pakistan,
Islamabads security perceptions do not allow New Delhi to
become too powerful. Then when some responsible BJP leaders like
Jaswant Singh urge Pakistan to go nuclear, they should realize they
arc playing with fire.
The first remark made after the demolition of the
Babri Masjid was that the Two Nation Theory was proved right, underlining
that Hindus and Muslims were two different nations. Some hooligans
took it upon themselves to raze the Masjid to the ground and the
BJP state government remained inactive. Does this mean that those
hooligans represent the entire Hindu community?
True, India has not yet become a truly secular country.
True, there are Hindu-Muslim riots. True, the police and the authorities
have often been found communal. Still, great efforts are being made
at every level to see that the virus of communalism is eliminated
and that equality before law is never undermined.
The fact that the BJP has progressed from eight seats
in the Lok Sabha to 180 in the last 18 years is of great concern
to the people. Still it had to give up its program to build the
Ram temple, to enforce common law and to shelve the amendment to
Article 370, which gives special status to Kashmir, to form the
government.
This article first appeared in the June 5, 1998 edition
of The Nation, a Pakistani daily newspaper. Reprinted with
permission.
Kuldip
Nayar, a former Indian high commissioner (ambassador) to the U.K.,
is a prominent Indian journalist. |