July/August 1993, Page 48
Special Report
Growing Links Between Iran and Lebanon Still
Run Through Damascus
By Marilyn Raschka
Although Lebanon is the focus of much of its attention, Iran has
only a charge d'affaires heading its embassy in Beirut, and there
are no direct flights linking Beirut and Tehran. An agreement to
start direct Iran-Lebanon flights was negotiated two years ago,
but never implemented.
There is a one-word explanation for the lack of direct contacts:
Damascus. In terms of Iranian-Lebanese relations, all roads lead
there and, literally, all flights begin there. That's just one of
the perks of being the main power broker in Lebanon.
"The most important embassy has to be in Damascus, that's
clear," said a journalist interviewed by the Washington
Report. Issues of policy are dealt with in Damascus, while Iran's
embassy in Beirut restricts itself to visa requests and other consular
services.
Security comes into play as well. Even though Iran's Beirut embassy
maintains a low profile, its communications-dish-studded building
presents an easy target for Israeli air attack. Rumors have it that
a move to several smaller locations is in the works.
Lebanon's Shi'i community was estimated to be 17 percent of the
population at the time Lebanon gained its independence in 1943.
It now is thought to be more than 50 percent, making it the majority
sect knots to work out as well
The Arab-Israeli peace negotiations and armed Hezbollah resistance
to the Israeli presence in south Lebanon are the most sensitive
issues between the two countries. Iran continues to believe the
negotiations have produced nothing, and maintains that the best
way to liberation and a just peaceis to support the Islamic Resistance
Frontin Lebanon, of which Hezbollah is the most active member. Lebanon
would like to see Hezbollah restrained to strengthen Lebanon's hand
in pursuing peace negotiations to secure Israeli withdrawal from
the occupied south.
The Lebanese delegation to Iran, led by parliament speaker Nabih
Berri, a Syrian-oriented Lebanese Shi'i leader, worked hard to explain
this position. Iran's expressed position was that no differences
would be allowed to harm Lebanon's unity which, according to Iranian
President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, "is the most important
immunity against the Israeli enemy and the best way to liberation."
But Iran's main power base in Lebanon continues to be Hezbollah.
In addition to its heavily armed presence in the south, Hezbollah
has since last summer's parliamentary elections earned itself six
seats in the country's legislatureitself an expansion from
the unofficial militia level to official participation in the government.
This step toward legitimacy has, according to one press source,
allowed Hezbollah to distance itself from ''the Iranian community"
and express some independence.
So what was on the menu when Lebanese and Iranian leaders sat down
together in Tehran? And how did the Lebanese digest the fare?
In a country which prefers to think of itself as a land of finely-balanced
minorities. Nevertheless, a Lebanese government source who agreed
to be interviewed insisted that the size of Lebanon's Shi'i community
has little to do with Shi'i Iran's interest there.
"Lebanon is the head of a bridge Iran wants to build over
Arab countries in the eastern Mediterranean," the source maintained.
In the Israeli-occupied territories, Iran is Hamas' chief external
supporter.
Today's growing official relations are a far but welcome cry from
the days when Iranian relations with Lebanon were confined largely
to Tehran's running of the Hezbollah militia's roughshod show in
Lebanon. However, Shi'i Hezbollah militiamen in the areas adjacent
to Israel's self-defined "security zone" in southern Lebanon
have never been disarmed by the Lebanese army, and every Lebanese
is uneasily aware of it.
"The most positive thing is the transitional nature of the
relations with Iran," a newspaper source pointed out. "They
are moving from unofficial [with militias] to the official."
Early 1993 saw a number of visits by Lebanese government officials
and deputies to Tehran under the banner of strengthening ties. But
there were some
The Menu in Tehran
Support for policy on deporteesThe Lebanese delegation
received nothing but praise and support for its refusal to allow
Israel to use Lebanon as a port of deportation for the 400 Palestinian
Muslims expelled in December. Iran's condemnation of Israel's deportation
policy, and the deportees' own support for Lebanon's stand, made
this item the easiest to deal with.
Assistance for reconstructionAyatollah Khamenei declared
that Iran wanted to help Lebanon as much as possible. In fact, it
is Iranian money that poured into Lebanon for social works that
helped build Hezbollah's kingdom in the poorer Shi'i areas of Beirut,
and in the south. But with increased Lebanese government assistance
available some sources see a conflict looming. "Iranian assistance
groups build popularity on the suffering of others," said one
Lebanese government official. "If the Lebanese government takes
over rebuilding (the social services), these religious groups will
feel they've lost their chance."
There's already been a run-in over a proposed runway to be added
to Beirut airport and other changes which would alter the Shi'i
suburbs which border the airport. Accusations of "changing
the ethnic color" of the area have been leveled at the government
by some Shi'i leaders.
American factorWell aware of Lebanon's appetite for
good relations with the United States, Iran brought up its objections
to U.S. attacks on Iraq with the visiting Lebanese delegation. This
is part of Iran's policy of support for peoples under U.S. attack,
even if Iran disagrees with regimes ruling them.
Iran would welcome a change in U.S. policy that would lead to friendlier
relations with Washington. This would be of benefit to Lebanon which,
in the past, has paid a heavier price than Iran itself for Iranian-U.S.
tensions. A commemorative service was held at the present U.S. Embassy
here in April on the 10th anniversary of the bombing of the U.S.
Embassy, attributed to the Iran-connected Islamic Jihad organization.
Just days before, the U.S. had reiterated its decision to keep Iran
at the top of its list of countries that sponsor global terrorism.
Iran-watchers here warn the West against hysteria when it comes
to Iranian-Lebanese relations. They argue that Lebanon in peace
needs to strengthen ties with, everybody, especially regional powers.
And good Iranian-Lebanese relations are not new. Even in the era
of the shah, aid flowed to Lebanon's Shi'i community.
If the West feels nervous over Iran's interest in its co-religionists
in Lebanon's Shi'i community, "think of how the Shi'i feel
when the Vatican expresses interest in the country's Christians,"
challenged a Shi'i source.
Lebanon's geographically, and now politically, strategic Shi'i
community is the obvious reason for "the ties that bind"
the two countries. But the years of hostage taking also played a
role. "We entered into very special relations with Iran to
get the hostages out," said a high-ranking Lebanese official
as he argued for U.S. cancellation of the six-year-old U.S. State
Department ban against American travel in Lebanon, and an eight-year
revocation of Lebanese airlines' landing rights in the U.S. There
are no flights between Lebanon and the U.S. Nor are there flights
between Lebanon and Iran. But somehow trade continues in both directions.
Along with traditional Iranian carpets and caviar comes ideology
and rhetoric. And alongside a model of Jerusalem's Dome of the Rock
on the airport road, a Diet Pepsi sign competes for the attention
of even the most fundamentalist Shi'i. |