July 1991, Page 23
Jerusalem Journal
Palestinian Economy in Chaos After Gulf War
By Frank Collins
The Palestinian economy has been devastated by the Gulf war and
its aftermath. Already crippled by 24 years of discriminatory economic
restrictions imposed by the Israeli occupation authorities, three
major disasters have knocked out the underpinnings of the economy.
The first disaster was a curfew of unprecedented length and stringency
imposed on the occupied territories for the duration of the Gulf
war. The next disaster was the post-war closing of the Green Line
to tens of thousands of Palestinians who had worked in Israel before
the war. The third calamity was a cut-off of revenues to Palestinian
institutions from the Gulf states as a result of the war.
Because of these and other negative factors, an overall drop of
one-quarter to one third in Palestinian per capita income is likely
for 1991. With unemployment between 40 and 50 percent in April,
and the savings of many families used up, many Palestinians are
reduced to abject poverty. Although there are adequate food supplies
in the occupied territories, the lack of money prevents families
from buying. In late February, the purchases of red meat had dropped
by 80 percent, and of poultry by 40 percent.
While direct relief from international agencies, such as UNRWA,
for the destitute is obviously necessary to meet this emergency,
such relief must be viewed as a temporary stop-gap. The only real
solution for the economic plight of the Palestinians is a far reaching
reconstruction of the economy of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
While capital investment, both public and private, from abroad will
be vital for financing this reconstruction, the amount required
will be comparatively modest because of the relatively small Palestinian
population of 1.7 million and the small dimensions of the economy.
The amount of capital required is in marked contrast to the massive
aid being furnished to Israel by the United States. While Israel
is receiving billions, US economic aid to the occupied territories
is being cut back from $14 million to $12 million by the present
Congress.
The administrative machinery that could be used for assisting Palestinians
to restore and expand their economy already exists. It consists
of the international and Palestinian non-governmental organizations
(NGOs) that have been working successfully through two decades of
occupation to raise the Palestinian standard of living. The present
economic crisis has impelled formation of the Coordinating Committee
of the International NGOs (CCINGO) for collective action on humanitarian
matters of common concern.
An essential requirement for enlarging NGO operations is, of course,
additional funding. An equally important requirement, however, is
the freeing of the Palestinian economy from the bureaucratic control
of the occupying authorities.
For the 24 years of their occupation of the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, the Israelis have systematically done everything in their
power to block the normal development of the Palestinian economy.
Far from allowing the growth and modernization of the economic infrastructure,
the occupation authorities have gone to great lengths to thwart
any progress in this direction.
They have striven to make the Palestinian economy totally dependent
on, and subordinate to, that of Israel. A major result has been
creation of a workforce of 120,000 Palestinians who are forced to
cross the Green Line every day to work in menial jobs in Israel
because of the very limited employment opportunities in the occupied
territories.
The occupation authorities make and enforce all regulations affecting
the Palestinian economy, including ownership of land and natural
resources, licensing of all business activities, taxation, and export
and import controls. These regulations have the force of law and
are seldom successfully challenged in the Israeli courts.
Israeli goods are freely exportable to the occupied territories,
but the export of Palestinian goods to Israel is severely restricted
and in many cases completely forbidden. The result has been a Palestinian
annual trade deficit with respect to Israel which was $657,500,000
in 1987, according to Israeli figures. The licensing of a new Palestinian
factory requires securing certification from potential Israeli competitors
that they will not suffer from the new Palestinian competition.
Naturally, very few licenses for new factories are granted. Water
consumption by Palestinians is restricted to 1967 levels, with the
result that irrigated agriculture has declined from 18 to 5 percent
of the Palestinian economy.
International NGOs have experienced the same roadblocks as have
the Palestinians in attempts to promote the growth of the Palestinian
economy. Typically, licenses are refused for such projects as the
bulldozing of rocky land for the planting of trees, the building
and improvement of agricultural roads, the building of cold storage
facilities and the provision of sewage treatment systems for refugee
camps. Some NGOs have been struggling to obtain licenses from the
Israeli authorities for more than seven years.
The curfew imposed hardships on the 1.7 million Palestinians scarcely
imaginable to Westerners. Homes were turned into prisons where large
families of a dozen or more persons were confined to three or four
small rooms, or one or two rooms in the Gaza Strip. In villages,
sanitary facilities were often inaccessible, being located outside
the houses. The curfew continued for weeks on end, with shopping
allowed only once every several days for an hour or two. In Gaza,
only women were allowed to leave their houses even then. The men
remained confined in their home prisons.
In addition to these human costs of the curfew, there were terrible
economic costs as well. Many families were forced into debts they
may never be able to repay. Many small businesses were bankrupted.
Family earnings virtually ceased, because only a handful of essential
workers were allowed to go to work or to carry on their businesses.
Farmers could neither plant nor tend their crops. The losses in
agriculture, the largest sector of the Palestinian economy, were
enormous. According to figures supplied by CONGO, the losses due
to the curfew in all sectors of the economy were between $150 and
$200 million.
Nor is this the end of the story. The economic losses will continue
because of the loss of employment in Israel, reduced Palestinian
purchasing power, the collapse of tourism, the reduction in remittances
from family members employed in the Gulf area, and the reduction
in the support of Palestinian institutions by the Gulf states.
The number of Palestinians now allowed to work in Israel has been
reduced by at least two-thirds because of Israeli "security"
requirements and the flood of Soviet immigrants who are seeking
employment in Israel. These losses are likely to be permanent, and
they have put the Palestinian economy in a state of acute depression.
Until a large recovery program is instituted, deflationary forces
may be expected to drive the economy to still lower levels.
Accurate projection of such losses for 1991 is difficult, but the
total loss to the economy may be in excess of $600 million and perhaps
as high as $1 billion. This is' from a Palestinian gross national
income (GNI) of $2.4 billion for 1988, as reported by the Statistical
Abstracts for Israel. Since 1988, Palestinian incomes have dropped
steadily because of the continuing intifada. These figures indicate
the depth of the depression into which the Palestinian economy will
slump by the end of 1991, unless the situation is addressed by international
agencies and sufficient funds committed to meet the present grave
emergency.
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) must necessarily
bear the main burden. However, the longer term building of an infrastructure
for an independent Palestinian economy can appropriately be undertaken
by private voluntary and business agencies. In the long run, a successful
Palestinian economy must be founded on private enterprise. In order
to stimulate the growth of a profitable economic infrastructure,
however, proper funding must be provided for the non-profit international
NGOs. These are staffed with experts who are highly experienced
with the economic problems of Palestinian agriculture, industry
and commerce. With their present small budgets, the NGOs have been
limited in the tasks they have been able to assume, but their leaders
express confidence that their organizations could expand to much
greater responsibilities in a reasonably short time.
Stimulating Private Enterprise
Some 20 international NGOs and governments are working with several
dozen Palestinian NGOs and other institutions in the occupied territories
in such fields as health, education, family services, and agriculture,
industry and commerce. The latter are particularly relevant to economic
recovery.
One such productive enterprise is an agricultural development project
sponsored by a Palestinian NGO and funded by an Italian NGO over
a three-year period, at which time the project is planned to become
self-supporting. It assists 11 developmental undertakings in villages
that are geographically distributed from Nablus to Hebron. While
administered from East Jerusalem, the projects are self-managed
by village committees of the farmers who are directly involved.
The costs of the development are shared between the Italian NGO
and the farmer participants. The project includes educating farmers
in modern techniques for improving animal and crop production and
profitability under the environmental conditions of the occupied
territories.
The closing of the Green Line to most of the Palestinian workers
in Israel and the Palestinian reverses following the Gulf war may
represent an important turning point in the struggle against the
Israeli occupation. With the disappearance of much of the economic
support from the Gulf countries, the Palestinians must now devote
their primary effort to the building of a viable economic infrastructure,
a prerequisite for Palestinian self-sufficiency, under whatever
political form the Palestinians choose. The alternative is chaos.
The foregoing is a condensation of an extended report on the
subject by Frank Collins, who divides his time between the US national
capital and Jerusalem. A copy of the report may be obtained from
the American Educational Trust, PO Box 53062, Washington, DC 20009.
Enclose $5 to cover postage and handling. |