Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, July 1987, page
20
Book Review
After the Last Sky: Palestinian Lives
By Edward W. Said with photographs by Jean Mohr.
New York: Pantheon, 1986. 174 pp., $22.95 (cloth), $14.95 (paper).
Reviewed by Roger Gaess
"The road forward is blocked, the instruments
of the present are insufficient, we can't get to the past,"
laments Edward Said in After the Last Sky, his moving narrative
of the Palestinian national condition after the 1982 Israeli invasion
of Lebanon. Said's powerful text, made more explicit by Jean Mohr's
touching photographs of everyday Palestinian life, makes some tentative
suggestions as to how, under existing circumstances, Palestinians
might best transcend their "essential national incompleteness."
The cultural and political questions Said addresses are: Palestinian
self-definition; coming to grips with Palestinian history; the need
to forge a coherent national policy towards the conflict with Zionism;
and Palestinian relations with the Arab states and with other powers.
Said and Mohr move beyond simplistic and dehumanizing
images of the Palestinians as terrorists, which their enemies have
successfully fostered, to the complex realities of Palestinian identities.
But dispossession and dispersion frustrate the search for a Palestinian
image and voice. Today, Said points out, there are at least three
completely separate sets of circumstances which characterize Palestinian
life: there are those who live as Arab citizens of Israel, those
who live under occupation in the West Bank and Gaza, and those physically
in exile or total estrangement from Palestine. Said, who left Palestine
as a boy in 1947, shows the reader that representing the Palestinians
fairly is a substantial problem, given their diverse geographical
locations and political circumstances. "We are at once too
recently formed and too variously experienced to be a population
of articulate exiles with a completely systematic vision."
As a consequence, Said, a professor of English literature
at Columbia University and a member of the Palestine National Council,
argues that whenever Palestinians portray themselves, their forms
are necessarily unconventional, hybrid, and fragmentary. Employing
a digressive manner and alternating voice, he illustrates this in
After the Last Sky by drawing upon a miscellany of Palestinian
poetry, fiction, film, and autobiography.
The text and photos are remarkable for their engaging
and passionate interplay. For the reader and for Said, Mohr's photographs
of Palestinians in various conditions and walks of life (except
the military) both depict and prompt, and they also serve as sounding
boards to test the validity of Said's offered conclusions.
After the Last Sky rigorously examines the
PLO's current international predicament, which gives it little room
to maneuver, and the feeling among Palestinians that they have been
caught in the shadow of the Holocaust and cast as the Victim's victim
whose cause has been judged unworthy.
How can the Palestinians—faced with such a variety
of problems—forge a coherent response? Said sees a glimmer
of hope from Palestinians in the occupied territories who demonstrate
both an increased self-consciousness and determination to stay in
historic Palestine. He quotes from a book, The Third Way,
by Raja Shehadeh, a West Bank lawyer, who defines the concept of
"Sumud," Arabic for "steadfastness,"
as the determination "to stay put, to cling to our houses and
land by all means available." From this perspective, even the
most demeaning work takes on a connotation of resistance, an obduracy
that reasserts presence through positive intent. Said finds sumud
"an entirely successful tactical solution" at a time
when no efficacious strategy is available.
Said argues that the Algerian, Cuban, and Vietnamese
models for national liberation are not appropriate for the Palestinian
situation. In fact, he notes, the Palestinians' insistence on "armed
struggle" has not only diverted them from more important and
productive aspects of struggle, but also "played right into
the hands of Israel, which with its superior propaganda apparatus
turned everything we did against its occupation of our lands, its
devastation of our villages, and its oppression of our population,
into "terrorism.'"
Said apparently is calling for a wide-ranging introspection—one
that will analyze Palestinian strengths and weaknesses, fully assess
the complex and mixed circumstances that bind Palestinians as a
people, and critically assimilate the past. Why, for instance, were
Palestinians forced out by terror in 1948, rather than standing
fast, organizing and fighting?
Said, however, declines to go beyond "posing
the questions in this tentative form." But who, then, should
answer them? And when? What are the alternatives to armed struggle
and current PLO directions? And how much time do the Palestinians
still have to reach their consensus and act, purposefully and effectively,
upon it?
Roger Gaess is a New York-based journalist who
specializes in Mideast affairs. |