Washington Report, July 15, 1985, Page 11
Personality
David Obey
By Najwa Sa'd
David R. Obey, widely recognized as one of the most important,
rising members of the U.S. House of Representatives, has a penchant
for moving fast and focusing on the big picture. Both traits may
be tested in his new position as Chairman of the Appropriations
Subcommittee on Foreign Operations. In addition to his key role
in shaping the annual foreign assistance appropriation, he intends
to participate actively in the search for Middle Eastern peace.
Obey has always been a man in a hurry. He had already worked in
real estate and earned a B.A. and an M.A. in political science from
the University of Wisconsin when he was elected to the Wisconsin
General Assembly in 1963 at the age of 24. Six years later he was
elected to Congress from Wisconsin's 7th District.
Since arriving in Washington, Obey has steered a 15-member committee
to rewrite the House code of ethics, authored legislation to mandate
public financing of campaigns, and become a leading Democratic respondent
to Administration budget proposals. He narrowly lost a bid for chairmanship
of the Budget Committee in 1980.
A Frank Critic of Military Aid
From his position on the Subcommittee on Foreign Operations, he
criticized the trend toward increasing military aid and decreasing
economic development funds. He also became a frank critic of the practice,
ever since Egypt and Israel signed a peace agreement, of linking their
aid levels. The two countries together consume some 40 percent of
the U.S. foreign assistance budget.
Back in 1976, Obey sponsored an amendment to reduce by $200 million
the Administration's proposed increase of $1.2 billion in military
aid for Israel. His motion drew the attention of Israel's powerful
Washington lobby and was defeated 342 to 32. Nevertheless, he called
publicly for "full and open debate" on aid to Israel and,
in 1977, he became the only member of his Subcommittee ever to meet
with PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat.
Last fall Chairman Clarence "Doc" Long of the Appropriations
Subcommittee on Foreign Operations lost a bitterly-contested 1984
Maryland Congressional race, even though pro-Israel Political Action
Committees spent far more on his campaign than on any other House
race.
Obey took over the subcommittee and his insistence on thorough
legislative review of all aid requests may save him from falling
into his predecessor's habit of giving Israel at least as much as
the Administration requested, regardless of questions raised or
cuts recommended in other portions of foreign assistance bills.
At a time when all Americans were being asked to accept cutbacks
in domestic spending, the Reagan Administration presented Obey's
Subcommittee with a request for foreign assistance totaling nearly
$15 billion. Obey vowed "to educate" himself and the Congress
in a series of overview hearings in which experts testified on the
history, effectiveness and future prospects for U.S. Government
foreign assistance programs.
During the course of these hearings, Obey maintained that the original
concept of the U.S. foreign assistance program has become "warped"
toward political and military short-term goals, rather than the
long-term economic development for which the programs were conceived.
Under the Reagan Administration, requests for military aid, he noted,
had absorbed increasingly larger slices of the foreign aid pie.
Obey also objected to the fact that this year's proposal provides
less than $2 billion for long-term economic development projects.
Further, he expressed concern that these are so scattered throughout
the world that, in the words of one witness at the hearings, U.S.
aid becomes "invisible." If these trends continue, Obey
told the press, "maybe we ought to say, hey, it's over."
Open-Minded Approach to Mideast Problems
Obey is also wary of economic "bail out" programs and,
unlike many of his colleagues, tries" not to end-run" Administration
efforts to pressure Israel into making necessary economic reforms
before it receives further, massive, supplemental aid appropriations.
Upon returning from leading his colleagues on a study mission to Egypt,
Jordan, Syria and Israel, however, Obey defended the Administration's
request for an extra $1.5 billion over a two-year period for Israel
as a one-time measure to encourage the Israelis to take steps to reform
their economy. He stressed that, although it brings Israel's total
for the current fiscal year to more than $4.5 billion in combined
military and economic aid, it is "not a permanent increase."
At the same time, Obey met with Yassir Arafat again this year and
is urging that in its peace efforts the U.S. "try to ensure
the accurate representation of the views of the Palestinians ...
ideally through the presence and participation of responsible Palestinian
leaders."
Obey's fair and open-minded approach to his new duties carries
obvious political risks. At the same time, however, Wisconsin constituents
may be pleased by his determination to use dwindling U.S. foreign
assistance funds to alleviate world political and economic problems,
rather than just to pay off real or imagined political debts.
Najwa Sa'd is a research analyst specializing in legislative
analysis with the Middle East Policy and Research Center (MEPARC),
a publication of the National Association of Arab Americans. |