June/July 1997, pgs. 21, 98
Special Report
U.S. Promises More Aid for Israel After Groundbreaking
in Har Homa
by Shawn L. Twing
The Clinton administration promised Israel hundreds
of millions of dollars more in U.S. aid in the midst of an Israeli-inspired
crisis in the peace process in April. This repeated a pattern that
began last October when Israel was given $50 million in excess U.S.
military hardware after it unilaterally opened an archeological
tunnel adjacent to the Haram Al Sharif in Arab East Jerusalem, sparking
riots in which 65 Palestinians and 15 Israeli soldiers were killed.
Less than three weeks after Israeli bulldozers broke
ground for the 6,500-unit Jewish-only Har Homa settlement at Jabal
Abu Ghneim in March, Israeli Defense Minister Yitzhak Mordechai
met with U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen in Washington,
DC. During their April 3 meeting, Cohen promised Mordechai more
U.S. money for Israel's Arrow anti-tactical ballistic missile; increased
funding for the Nautilus laser designed to protect Israel from Katyusha
rocket attacks; continuing appropriations for anti-terrorism equipment;
and an agreement in principle on developing a $300 million U.S.
stockpile of weapons and ammunition to be ready at a moment's notice
for Israel's use. During the defense minister's visit, the Clinton
administration also gave the go-ahead for Israel's purchase of $200
million worth of UH-60 Blackhawk transport helicopters with 34 spare
engines, and committed the United States to joint three-nation military
maneuvers with Turkey and Israel.
Reports of the astonishing Mordechai-Cohen breakfast
meeting at the Pentagon appeared in Defense News, the Washington
Times and the Jerusalem Post. The detailed list of U.S. aid promises
includes:
•Arrow missile: Pending congressional
approval, which is all but assured for the Arrow project, the Pentagon
favors up to a 25 percent increase in the current $200 million over
five years appropriated for the Arrow Deployability Program approved
by President Clinton last year. In March, Israeli officials floated
a proposal for an "Arrow Beyond 2000" program for integrated
testing in Israel of the Arrow and the American-made Patriot Advanced
Capability-3 (PAC-3) missile, Defense News reported. The Israeli
officials hoped that the U.S. government would fund up to $70 million
of the project's costs. Apparently the Pentagon has committed itself
to at least an additional $50 million for the Arrow, after already
investing more than $650 million in the project since it began in
1988 (see the October/November 1995 Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs, pp. 12, 106-107). Paradoxically, despite a successful
March 11 test of the Arrow-2 interceptor, the United States still
has no plans to equip its own forces with Arrow missile batteries.
In March 6 testimony before the House National Security Committee,
Ballistic Missile Defense Organization chief Lt. Gen. Lester Lyles
said: "I want to emphasize that [Arrow] certainly does not
meet our operational requirements."
•Nautilus Laser: Following
last year's successful test-firing of the Nautilus program's Tactical
High Energy Laser, the United States appropriated $50 million in
fiscal year 1997 for the Israeli program designed to protect Israel's
northern border from Hezbollah Katyusha rocket attacks, a ten-fold
increase from the $5 million given Israel for fiscal year 1996.
Although no firm numbers were cited, the Pentagon committed itself
to funding two-thirds of the program, which could cost hundreds
of millions of dollars to develop and deploy, according to knowledgeable
sources.
•Anti-Terrorism Assistance:
Following suicide bombings in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Ashkelon in
the spring of 1996, President Clinton promised Israel $100 million
in American bomb detection and other anti-terrorist equipment. The
money was given in two installments of $50 million each in fiscal
years 1996 and 1997. Defense Secretary Cohen announced that an additional
$25 million in anti-terrorist assistance will be given to Israel
in fiscal year 1998 (which begins October 1, 1997).
•Military Stockpile: A unique
development in America's enormous and multi-faceted aid package
for Israel also was discussed during the Mordechai-Cohen meeting.
The United States agreed in principle to a $300 million stockpile
of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware that will be
stored in the United States and made available to Israel in times
of emergency, Defense News reported in April. The contents of the
stockpile will be chosen by the Israelis and are supposed to be
available to Israel and ready to deploy within 24 to 36 hours, according
to Israeli officials. "From our perspective, [the stockpile]
is a very meaningful form of assistance," Mordechai told Defense
News. "We don't have the money to buy all of these things in
advance. But under the agreement, it will be available if we need
it. And then we will pay for it."
•Transport Helicopters: Israel's
request to purchase 14 UH-60 Blackhawk transport helicopters and
34 engines for them was approved by the Clinton administration during
Defense Minister Mordechai's visit, but the manner in which they
will be funded remains a mystery. A unique and controversial idea
from the Israelis was first reported in the Dec. 16 Defense News
that described Israel's request to borrow $200 million in fiscal
year 1998 in high-interest loans that would be paid back using Israel's
aid from the United States in fiscal year 1999.
Israel cannot use money from its existing U.S. foreign
aid account, the article explained, because almost all of its military
aid through fiscal year 1998 is committed to Israel's multi-year
purchase of F-15I advanced air superiority fighters.
According to informed sources, this unique funding
idea was dropped by Israel a couple of months after it was proposed
in Washington on the grounds that it would prove too costly. Not
mentioned was the chutzpah associated with asking to borrow money
against an American foreign aid appropriation that hasn't yet been
requested by the administration, much less approved by Congress.
•Joint Military Maneuvers:
Secretary of Defense William Cohen also pledged U.S. support for
and involvement in joint Turkish-Israeli military maneuvers. Following
last year's signing of a bilateral accord increasing strategic coordination
between the two countries, Israel and Turkey have developed several
avenues of defense and economic cooperation. Last year Israel Aircraft
Industries won a $650 million contract to upgrade 54 Turkish F-4E
Phantom combat aircraft, and Israeli companies are competing for
billions of dollars worth of Turkish defense contracts including
F-5 fighter upgrades, an $800 million airborne early warning system,
upgrades for Turkey's American-made M60 tanks, and Turkey's eventual
purchase of a new main battle tank. The nature and scope of U.S.
involvement in joint military exercises was not revealed publicly
by the secretary of defense.
Despite the fanfare associated with Defense Minister
Mordechai's visit, U.S. and Israeli officials insist that all of
these new gifts to Israel had been "in the pipeline" for
a long time. This is an attempt to avoid criticism of U.S. timing
in bestowing still more aid to Israel at the same time the government
of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is ignoring U.S. calls for
observance of Israel's commitments to the Oslo accords.
Last October, members of Mordechai's entourage accompanying
him to Washington opined that the defense minister expected to be
reprimanded for Israel's opening of the Hasmonean tunnel in East
Jerusalem in September, setting off deadly clashes between Israelis
and Palestinians. Instead, they pointed out, Israel was rewarded
with $50 million in excess U.S. military equipment.
The latest peace-jeopardizing incident involved groundbreaking
for Har Homa, and this time, too, Defense Minister Mordechai walked
away with promises of more than half a billion dollars in increased
U.S. aid. Whether or not it is intentional, the message from the
U.S. government seems to be that the more Israel violates its agreements
with the Palestinians, the more aid the Clinton administration is
willing to give to make Israel feel secure.
Although Yitzhak Mordechai is widely respected among
Israelis, and even among Palestinians and other Arabs, he is not
a warm friend of Prime Minister Netanyahu. Instead he is considered
a formidable, and more moderate, rival to Netanyahu within the prime
minister's Likud Party.
Therefore, if the United States were to make future
commitments of aid to Israel contingent on Israel's willingness
to abide by its signed agreements with the Palestinians, America
might find a more receptive audience in Yitzhak Mordechai. Instead,
the Clinton administration is offering substantial aid to Binyamin
Netanyahu without political conditions. This is a seemingly certain
formula for derailing the Israeli-Palestinian peace process which
began with the Madrid Conference in 1991 and upon which good American
relations with all of the countries of the Middle East depend so
heavily. |