June 1995, Pages 11, 36
A Tale of Two Conferences: Arab Americans and Zionist
Americans
By Eugene Bird
The first weekend in May provided disturbing contrasts as the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) held its 1995 convention (at
the Crystal City Marriott near the Pentagon) from May 5-7 and the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its conference
(at the Washington Sheraton) from May 6-8. The contrast wasn't so
much in numbers, with perhaps 1,000 participants turning out for
ADC's 12th annual convention and 2,400 persons (including 700 students
whose attendance was subsidized) attending the 37th annual AIPAC
conference.
The shock was provided by AIPAC's demonstration of naked political
power. It was the first time an incumbent U.S. president had addressed
an AIPAC meeting, and he certainly was not alone. Fifty-three senators
and some 100 members of the House of Representatives also attended
the AIPAC outing. By contrast, only three members of Congress attended
the ADC affair. Nevertheless, morale was high as ADC members, after
a dismal financial year, seemed excited, perhaps even surprised,
to see the size of their turnout.
Those attending the AIPAC convention heard calls for continued
aid to Israel at present levels; for moving the U.S. Embassy to
Jerusalem; and for continued U.S. hostility to both Iran and Iraq
in the Middle East.
What Democrat Bill Clinton did not promise in the way of support
for Israel, Republican Senate Majority Leader Robert Dole did, making
it clear that he was prepared to out-Israel the president even to
the point of embarrassment. The next day, Senator Dole introduced
a bill in the Senate to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem
by 1999. Since about half of the Senate's members already had signed
a letter calling for the move, the bill seemed likely to pass. Will
the president sign it, even though Martin Indyk, Clinton's new ambassador
to Israel, told senators such a move would "explode" the
peace process? Dole was ready for that eventuality: "If the
peace process should fail in the end, I can assure you that Israel
will have the full support of the United States," he told the
cheering delegates.
AIPAC Positioning Itself for Likud Government
AIPAC changed its president again, letting Democrat Steve Grossman
retire with honor after shepherding the organization through a change
in direction from supporting Likud to supporting, however reluctantly,
the Rabin government and its recognition of the PLO. In fact, although
it adapted its official rhetoric to the Labor government, members
remain in tune with Likud. "Terror" was the word most
often heard, and there seemed little firm resolve to continue the
peace process if one more nasty incident occurred.
The new president of AIPAC is Melvin Dow of Houston, a lawyer with
stronger conservative credentials, one more sign of AIPAC positioning
itself for the 1996 elections in both Israel and the U.S. Even though
the crowd pleased the president's advisers by shouting "Four
More Years" during his Sunday night presentation before flying
off to Moscow to celebrate the 50th anniversary of V-E Day, there
was almost equal enthusiasm for Bob Dole.
Not one mention was made of Israeli government seizure of more
land in Jerusalem to build more Jewish settlement housing. No one
mentioned the continued refusal of Rabin to offer any substance
on a possible withdrawal from the Golan Heights.
Clinton: Help Me Get Aid to Jordan
The president did call for assistance in getting his full aid package.
When he got to funding of loan forgiveness for Jordan, however,
the crowd at AIPAC gave him luke-warm support. There was no talk
of "sharing" Israeli aid with its new and friendly neighbors
as a means of cutting the U.S. deficit, an idea suggested by Rep.
Sonny Callahan of Alabama. Given AIPAC's clout with Congress, it
seems the idea will be dead on arrival.
The AIPAC convention featured speaker after speaker attacking Iran,
Islamic fundamentalism, and Arafat. Only one lonely voice was heard
urging a policy of including radicals in the peace process, wooing
them to join in negotiations or in sharing responsibility for governing
the Palestinians. That voice was Kenneth Katzman of the Congressional
Research Service and his views were not received with any enthusiasm
by the Zionist group.
Instead the theme was the unbridled arrogance of power: deciding
who are to be America's next enemies, and rejecting any "sharing
the pain" with other Americans to balance the budget. "Relations
between Israel and the United States are at a new high point,"
Neal Sher, executive director, said, "but we are not complacent.
We must work constantly to strengthen both strategic ties and the
involvement of Washington in confronting Iran."
Another $3 Billion in Contracts for Israeli War
Industries
In his talk, President Clinton cited contracts for $3 billion in
U.S. military purchases from Israel that have been signed by the
Pentagon as proof of support for Israel by his administration far
beyond the ordinary aid package. (The U.S. Department of Commerce
calculates that each $1 billion creates between 20,000 and 40,000
jobs, meaning the Clinton administration has transferred between
60,000 and 120,000 U.S. defense industry jobs to Israelis.) He also
cited the free-trade agreement between the two countries, "giving
Israel better access to the U.S. markets than any other country."
Israel made $8 billion in sales to the U.S. last year.
No one mentioned that in Jerusalem the previous week, former Florida
Congressman Dan Mica and agricultural committee members were citing
the failure of Israel to live up to its free-trade agreement with
the U.S., specifically by continuing tariffs and thereby excluding
U.S. farm goods for the most part. However, no U.S. retaliation
has been threatened, and only the Jerusalem Post reported
this violation by Israel of the terms of its agreement with the
United States. No U.S. media informed American readers of this complaint
by U.S. legislators.
The ADC Convention
By contrast, ADC audiences heard a call for lifting sanctions on
Iraq and for an approach to a dialogue with Tehran, a reversal of
Clinton policies in both cases. Nor did members of ADC take much
comfort in the prospects of a Republican victory next year. Quite
the contrary, they groused about Dole's Jerusalem embassy bill and
found little cheer in a possible Gingrich candidacy.
One of the most dramatic moments occurred when a 13-year-old Arab-American
girl asked veteran ABC newsman Sam Donaldson, a convention speaker,
"Why do you hate us?" Donaldson, stunned, reassured the
girl that "we do not hate you." In a session that was
viewed by C-SPAN audiences across the country, Donaldson's talk
was the only national coverage the ADC convention received. However,
the poignant exchange was the explanation for a rather emotional
soliloquy by Donaldson in his regular appearance on the Sunday "This
Week With David Brinkley" program, in which he invited viewers
to imagine themselves in the situation of Arab Americans during
the first few hours after the Oklahoma City bombing.
Other ADC speakers, including Hanan Ashrawi and Walid Khalidi,
attracted an enthusiastic response. The crowd was particularly moved
by Khalidi's call for holding Israeli feet to the fire of the Oslo
agreement: "Organize, organize, organize," he said to
cheers. "We have only three choices: accept Oslo (as they interpret
it with the U.S.); reject it and go back to an intifada; or persist
in working with its terms and exploit it to the maximum."
He called for the latter: Do not let the Israeli negotiators and
the United States erode Oslo. Work with it to achieve a state.
Eugene Bird is president of the Council for the National Interest,
a membership organization based in Washington, DC. |