June 1994, Page 3
Letters to the Editor
Letters to the editor are selected and edited on the basis of
relevance, accuracy, taste and available space. 7he editors do not
have facilities to respond to individual letters, or to clear in
advance published letters, as edited, with the writers.
Bobby Inman, Strobe Talbott
My initial reaction to your Feb./March article on Bobby Inman's
nomination as secretary of defense and his subsequent withdrawal
from consideration for that post was that you were reading too much
into events. However, after watching the congressional hearings
and Senate floor debate on Strobe Talbott's confirmation as deputy
secretary of state, one has to wonder.
Strobe, as a result of some illuminating comments about the Middle
East during his career as a journalist, managed to get a few of
his lights knocked out as he ran the pro-Israel gauntlet in Congress.
A number of speakers spent an inordinate amount of time attacking
Mr. Talbott for the blasphemy of noticing the territorial ambitions
of the Likud and Prime Minister Shamir with respect to lands occupied
in 1967 and for questioning Israel's value as a strategic asset.
In the end Mr. Talbott, even after eating a few words and pledging
his full fidelity to our friend and ally in the Middle East, found
an unusually high number of senators (3 1) opposed to his nomination.
Mr. Talbott's past views on the Soviet Union were factors in the
opposition, and no doubt much of the debate was a game meant to
appease small constituencies on the right who have steadfastly opposed
the peace process. Still, it served as a chilling reminder of the
political peril of ever criticizing Israel and illustrated perfectly
why it has been next to impossible to get open and honest discussion
of Middle East issues by our politicians.
Bobby Inman may indeed have been wise to avoid the process. Had
he gone through with it, and with his integrity and stubbornness,
he might not have played along with attendant consequences to his
nomination. Mr. Inman appeared headed for a hassle he didn't deserve
for a job he didn't want.
A. Douglas Reeves, Alexandria, VA
Strobe Talbott and Galileo
Poor Strobe Talbott. He's our Galileo. Nominated by Clinton to
be deputy secretary of state, he was called on the carpet by The
Lobby in Congress because, 10 years ago, when the Israelis invaded
Lebanon and slaughtered tens of thousands of innocents while trying
to capture Yasser Arafat, Talbott, outraged, wrote that Israel was
"an outright liability to American security interests. "
He also warned that American Jews, in their ability to dictate Middle
East policy by buying politicians and controlling the media, had
power far beyond their numbers. Poor Talbott. Like Galileo before
his inquisitors, he was forced to recant in public. If he wanted
the job to which he was appointed, he had to "backpedal,"
according to The New York Times, and downright "renounce,"
his earlier views.
He had to swear fealty to The Lobby: Yassuh, massa!
When the Inquisitors forced Galileo to recant his claim that the
earth moved around the sun, and not vice versa, as the Church believed,
he was heard to mutter under his breath, "It moves!"
Wonder what Strobe Talbott muttered under his.
Dale Walker, Hoboken, NJ
Senator Warner on Israel
The enclosed letter was written to me by Senator John Warner in
reply to my complaint about excessive amounts of aid we give to
Israel.
I found the third paragraph particularly stunning since it appears
to me that our beneficence is producing exactly the opposite effect
from the positive one he describes.
Your magazine is wonderful, I look forward to every issue.
Lucy S. Smith, Dinwiddie, VA
Senator Warner's letter to you is reprinted in this issue's
"Other People's Mail" on page 33.
An Arab View on U.S. Policy
I am a longtime supporter of the Washington Report and want
to express again my continuous appreciation for your efforts to
enlighten the American people regarding the true facts about Israeli
Palestinian issues.
I read this article by Khaled AlMaeena, former editor of the Arab
News, a straight to the point expression of how we in this
part of the worlds feel. Perhaps you could reprint it in the Washington
Report. I spoke with Mr. AlMaeena yesterday and told him I was
forwarding it to youyou may already have had it brought to your
attention. Else Fenner Bogary, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Khaled Maeena's column is reprinted in "Other Voices "
on page 108.
Waiting For the IRS
I am enclosing a response from the Internal Revenue Service to
my query about the "Coalition for Jewish Concerns AMCHA, which
published a fullpage advertisement in the Nov. 30, 1993 New York
Times signed by 1,000 rabbis urging a pardon for convicted spy
for Israel Jonathan Pollard.
I cannot accept that the public has no right to know anything about
tax exempt organizations and I will follow up with them in some
manner.
Arthur Lowrie, Lutz, FL
The letter from the IRS is printed in this issue's "Other
People's Mail" on page 35.
Feel Free to Reprint
I enclose an opinion piece of mine that was printed in the Milwaukee
Journal on March 6. Feel free to reprint it or use it in any
way that might be helpful.
I wish to repeat what I've said before about the Washington
Report. It is a valuable and virtually unique resource for information
on Middle East issues. The check I sent you in January also expresses
my hope that you will continue in economic good health.
Robert B. Ashmore, Mequon, WI
Your article is reprinted in "Other Voices " on page
110.
More Iran News, Please
Endeavor on! Enclosed is my third year's subscription. My only
wish is that there be more reporting of news relating to Iran, and
not just the odd inflammatory news flash. There have been too many
years of enmity between the U.S. and Iran! Where is the basic humanity?
I am sure a political rapprochement between Washington and Tehran
is remote. If only the citizenry of nations could transcend the
walls of distrust governments erect. This is the divide your publication
strives to fill. This is where you shine. There are many Iranians
in this country. Through providence, I have come to know them, and
love them. I am sad to note that I haven't a memory of a time when
there was a spirit of friendship between the two nations. This March
21 marked the start of the Persian New Year, Nowruz, the time for
hope and renewal. I hope one day that renewal will enter into the
minds of politicians here in the U.S. and Iran.
Khoda Hafez!
John D. Stitch, Slidell, LA
We have many Iranian readers and, sometimes, critics. We also
have had and still have staff members with Iranian spouses. So,
you can be sure, we share your wishes for better times in a relationship
that, on the government-to-government level, has been both too close
(in the shah's time) and too distant (at present) for comfort, but
which, on a person-to-person level, can never be close enough.
Better Iran News, Please
As a frequent reader, I have regularly noticed your desire to provide
the American public with balanced, accurate information regarding
Middle East affairs. Overall, you have been very supportive of Islam
and justice in the Middle East. However, when it comes to Iran,
I consistently see double standards in how you represent Iran and
its Islamic government.
My major complaint is regarding the work entitled "A Fourth
Muslim Woman Assumes Command" (Feb./March 1994). Was this an
article to present the facts or a propaganda advertisement to support
the Marxist/Communist movement that has found a limelight in Iran?
Don't get me wrong, I fully support the rights of a female Muslim
to rule an Islamic state, but a Muslim cannot be a Communist just
as a Muslim cannot be a Marxist. What do you think the National
Council of Resistance, or the People's Mojahedin is? If you don't
know, then maybe you should research what happened for 14 years
in Afghanistan in the name of the People's Party and the Flag Party.
What makes you think that the Islamic government of Iran "seized"
power? Khomeini's regime was put in by popular demand or as we say
in America through free and democratic elections. Why are you so
intent on supporting Ms. Rajavi and her support of the destruction
of the present regime? With Algeria's free, democratic elections
an Islamic majority was voted in. Instantly, the Western governments
cried foul and claimed the elections were improperly done. Is this
what you all are supporting to happen in Iran?
You never discussed why Ms. Rajavi was in refugee status. History
tells us, though, that it was for her treasonous acts during the
Iran-Iraq war. Think about it why would the resistance group's National
Liberation Army be based in Iraq? In the U.S. we punish treason
during war times with capital punishment. She's lucky to be in refugee
status.
She wants there to be "a spirit of mutual understanding,
forgiveness, and national unity" how hypocritical of her to
expect the Muslim people of Iran to forgive her for helping impose
a war on Iran from her headquarters in Iraq.
Ms. Elizabeth Kunkel, Albuquerque, NM
We hold no special brief for any particular opposition group
in Iran. If there is another one with significant following, we'd
be happy to write about its leaders too. We've concluded, however,
that no moderate leaders remain within Iran. They are all in the
cemeteries. Outside Iran, the Mojahedin seem to be the only group
with even a semblance of organization. As for your contention that
the Khomeini regime came to power democratically, or that literally
killing all political opponents is Islamic, we'd like to hear more
on that from some of our Iranian readers. We have absolutely no
editorial axes to grind. We find the present Iranian government
reprehensible, and the U. S. policy of not dealing either with it
or with opposition groups ridiculous. Why do we care at all? Because
it is the fear of an unpredictable Iran, eventually in defacto alliance
with an unpredictable Israel, as occurred during the Iraq-Iran war
(remember Irangate?) that fuels the arms race that eventually can
impoverish and destabilize much of the Middle East.
Activism in New Mexico
The New Mexico Chapter 63 of Veterans for Peace purchased space
in a principal local daily, the Albuquerque Journal, for
an ad reproducing the AET bumper sticker pictured above to appear
before the April 15 income tax deadline to catch taxpayers while
they are most concerned.
I'm reporting separately on the substantial support received from
both local and national offices of Veterans for Peace. In addition,
the local chapter recently purchased space to reprint twice in the
Daily Lobo, the UNM campus daily, Ella Bancroft's article
on U.S. aid to Israel (p. 33, January Washington Report).
The enclosed cartoon by John Trever, a nationally syndicated cartoonist
for the Albuquerque Journal, appeared in the Journal's
March 3 edition.
You may be interested in the enclosed material concerning a March
5 memorial observance for Palestinian victims of the Hebron massacre
organized by the New Mexico chapter of the ADC. Attendance equaled
that at an observance held separately by the Albuquerque Jewish
community several days earlier.
George E. Luecker, Albuquerque, NM
Congratulations to all who had roles in the New Mexico activities
you describe. The Trever cartoon, along with your letter to the
Albuquerque Journal, are printed in "Other People's Mail "
on page 34 of this issue. Readers will be interested to know that
the cartoonist spent some of his youth in the Middle East when his
father, a noted scholar, was working with the Dead Sea Scrolls.
A Reader Since 1987
I subscribed to your esteemed journal in 1987 through the advice
of a friend. Since then, I have been a constant subscriber, reading
your journal from cover to cover, waiting impatiently for the arrival
of the next issue. I cannot find better words to describe your achievements
in telling the American public the truth about the Middle East than
those in your own Nov. 15, 1993 letters to subscribers. "For
two years everyone waited for disaster to befall an informed publication
that defied U. S. media taboos by audaciously debunking what Dr.
Alfred Lilienthal has called Middle East `mythinformation."'
Hence my congratulations to you and all of the staff of the Washington
Report for your extraordinary accomplishments.
Meanwhile, I shall appreciate receiving a copy of the book A Changing
Image: American Perceptions of the Arab-Israeli Dispute if available,
together with your bill. Also please put my name on your mailing
list as a prospective recipient of your first edition of "Seeing
the Light. " The attached check is sent to cover the cost of
subscriptions to the magazine to the attached list of recipients.
The remainder of the check is to be considered as a donation to
your journal.
M.F. AlHusseini, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
We deeply appreciate your donation, which would cover many more
subscriptions than those you requested.
Letter From an Angel
How great minds run along the same path! Just as I was about to
write you this note, your "Report to Our Stockholders"
arrived. I strongly feel that we need to continue our mission, and
your three principal goals for 1994 set the tone and give us the
direction to do so.
Enclosed is a list of names and addresses for opinion molders together
with my donation to join your Choir of Angels. Also enclosed is
an article from the Boston Globe, dated Nov. 23, 1993, regarding
the recently found diaries of a Jewish militia commander in 1948,
which is extremely informative.
Judith Howard, Alexandria, VA
You sent us a list of 14 media recipients, but your generous
donation will cover 40 opinion molder subscriptions. Every year
we send a circular to 22,000 public and school libraries in the
U. S. asking them to indicate which books from our library donation
packages they would put into circulation and whether they would
like a donated subscription to the Washington Report. We
will use your gift to pay for 26 subscriptions for some of the libraries
that have asked for them.
A Cry in the Wilderness
I would like to donate a gift subscription to the library listed
on the enclosed donation form. The balance of my check is to be
used in any way you see fit. My intent and purpose is to support
and promote your organization and publication.
When I was a boy I read the newspaper accounts of events taking
place in Palestine and was angry and frustrated for I could only
tell others about it. They, it seemed, were not interested. I felt
like a voice crying in the wilderness.
Now, thanks to you, I no longer feel alone. People are waking up
to the terrible human rights abuses inflicted on a brave but gentle
people by a powerful, arrogant, militaristic Israeli government.
There are now many publications that tell the true story of Palestine
and more are coming out. In his recent book on the Middle East,
British investigative author David Yallop describes on pages 268308
his visit to the Gaza Strip and the West Bank and the deplorable
conditions he found there. This book is Tracking the Jackal.
Now I am optimistic about the future. Meanwhile I will continue
to work for The Cause.
Robert E. Bigger staff, East Alton, IL
Thanks for your generosity. Tracking the Jackal is available
to Washington Report readers through the AET
Book Club.
Bravo to Charley Reese
A lot of news is probably coming at you from all sides, so what
I am sending today will be just "another item" for you
to use or not, as you see fit.
Charley Reese of the Orlando Sentinel (syndicated in various
papers) wrote an editorial I found compelling. I send it to you
together with the letter to the editor which I sent in the following
day; and which, needless to say, was not published. At least someone
must have read it to reject it!
Dr. Edna Homa Hunt, Winter Park, FL
It's great to produce a magazine whose readers do much of the
writing, collect the reference material, and even send us other
people's letters as potential subscribers and for our possible use.
Thanks to you and the many other readers who have been doing this
so faithfully for so long. As for Charley Reese's marvelously informed
column on the U.S. and the Israel-Palestine problem, we can't reprint
them anymore because his syndicate just doubled the price. We bet
we know why.
You Made My Day
I received a wonderful and unexpected surprise not too long ago
while reading the Jan. '94 issue of your magazine. Reading page
by page, article by article, I started the one on page 57. The lead
sentence spoke sentiments very much like my own. Surprise! It was
my contribution to "Seeing the Light. " Well, it made
my day and quite a few in addition.
In September 1992 I attended the first conference on U.S.-Arab
relations at V.M.I. in Lexington, VA. Your circulation department
sent me 25 copies of a recent issue of the Washington Report,
which I distributed to the participants. I also sent a summary
of the event which you included in your letters from readers. Enclosed
is a descriptive flyer for this year's conference and a contribution
to your work.
William Lord, Pittsburgh, PA
Your letter, like several above, shows how this magazine really
is the product of its readers, who also provide most of the advertising,
and many of the new subscriptions by circulating sample copies,
as you did, to people who are concerned about the Middle East, or
should be.
Korean and Israeli Nukes
Your Feb./March issue is great! It brings so much truth that the
great majority of the U. S. electronic and print media are too cowardly
to publish.
I am attaching a copy of a letter I sent to the Austin American
Statesman comparing current U. S. concerns with China and North
Korea with what should be similar concerns with Israel. The letter
was published, but with some editing that made it a little confusing
and reduced its impact. I have bracketed the omitted parts.
Incidentally, I also wrote President Clinton (and Ms. Reno) regarding
the Pollard case. I received the same form letter signed by the
president that reader Robert Cassinelli received. Ms. Reno did not
reply.
William V. Kelly, Austin, TX
Your letter is reprinted in "Other People's Mail "
on page 36.
A Pennsylvania Voter
While reading your "Special Report Senate Voting Record for
1993, " I was impressed at the high percentage of each senator
for "percent pro-AIPAC, " with the exception of Robert
Byrd of West Virginia. Being from Pennsylvania, I see that both
Wofford and Specter are 83 percent pro-AIPAC. Other than writing
letters to let them know I will not vote for them, what else can
I do to stop my money from going to AIPAC?
I would be interested in seeing you write more about this in upcoming
issues of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
Pamela C. Bierce, RN, Philadelphia, PA
Since you wrote your letter, author Don Neff covered in our
April/May 1994 issue Senator Byrd's unprecedented April 1992 speech
on the Senate floor discussing the vast amount of U. S. taxpayer
resources poured into Israel by Congress without any discernible
effect except to make Israel ever more dependent upon the United
States. One way to help the cause of candor in Congress about Israel
is to contribute to and vote for challengers to congressional incumbents
who have accepted money from pro-Israel PACs, as listed on pages
3739 of the April/May issue of the Washington Report.
It's Genocide, Stupid!
Re: Euphemism Trivializes Armenians' Tragic Past. Your January
1994 response to the letter to the editor titled "Don't Question
the Genocide" missed the writer's point.
The 1948 U.N. Convention defines genocide as any one of the following
acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnic, racial or religious group as such:
(a) Killing members of the group.
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group.
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
What Michael Dunn calls "Deportations" would have qualified
as genocide even if only one of the above five conditions had been
met. Yet the events, as documented by hundreds of reliable and impartial
eyewitness accounts, meet all five. That is why all serious scholarship
on the subject of genocide refers to the Armenian case along with
the Holocaust as a classical case of genocide.
The fact that "Turks speak so passionately of Turkish victims"
is beside the point. Equating the number of Turkish combatants killed
in battle (in a war launched by their own leadership) with the unarmed
Armenian population slaughtered by the agents of the very government
duty bound to protect them subverts the meaning of the word genocide.
As to your suggestion that "those who don't forget the past
are doomed to repeat it, " kindly note that, three generations
after the tragic events in question, the process of healing has
yet to begin for the Armenians. For it to begin, the culprit statelike
post Nazi Germany in the case of the Holocaust has to come to terms
with its ugly past and political commentators have to stop trivializing
a people's tragic past with euphemisms like "deportation."
For the sake of historical truth and journalistic integrity, let's
call a spade a spade.
Vartkes S. Dolabjian, Quebec, Canada
A Good Word for Israel
I am tired of having to defend my religious homeland's existence
to a bunch of spoiled, naive American Arabists who wouldn't know
what's going on in the Middle East if it sat on top of their trendy
kefflyah. I have been to the region. Although I don't proclaim to
know everything about the Middle East I do know it's a dangerous
place with dangerous people who play with a very different set of
rules. I know it's your policy to indoctrinate unknowledgeable Americans
about the Palestinian situation (like it's the only thing going
on in the Middle East) but maybe you can possibly one day show a
positive Israeli article. I know this might be asking a lot but
try it. We are not all oppressors and we have just as much right
to be there as the Palestinians. Shalom. Eretz Yisroyl Chai!!!!
The Lion of Zion
So if you're a lion, why did your lengthy and frequently obscene
letter, of which the above is only the expurgated final paragraph,
come in an envelope postmarked Northern Virginia but unsigned?
Another Unsigned Letter
I would love to speak out on Middle East issues but cannot because
of my employment with a Fortune 200 corporation. I cannot express
opinions at work; nor can I sign letters to editors. But I do enjoy
reading your publication which brings some balance into all of that
pro-Israel reporting in the so-called mainstream press.
I would like to write the editor of my local newspaper whose publisher
is so pro-Israel and ask what if the killing of Arab worshippers
at Hebron had been a reverse situation? What if an Arab extremist
had killed 29 Jews at the Wailing Wall?
The U. S. media would have gone crazy. There would have been latenight
Ted Koppel and the other two networks with specials on "the
tragedy" or "Holocaust." There would have been lots
of TV pictures of burial ceremonies, and the grief of the Israeli
people would have been widely shared for American viewers. No doubt
Vice President Gore would have been dispatched to Israel to represent
the American people in this time of great mourning. There would
have been denunciations by members of the House and Senate and some
would have worn black armbands. It would have been page one news
for many days with follow-up stories.
Some graduate student in journalism needs to do a master's thesis
on the evolution of this story. When the news broke that Israeli
soldiers might have been involved in the massacre, one of the major
daily newspapers in Ohio ran that on page 20A. It would be interesting
to see the treatment of the story on a national basis. Best of all,
someone needs to note how soon the story disappeared and became
a "nonstory" or not relevant any longer. Prediction: The
massacre at Hebron will end up like the sinking of the USS Liberty
as far as the media are concerned: It never happened!
A Subscriber, Ohio
Help Needed
I am writing to request the help of your readers in a pressing
humanitarian matter. In March 1991, immediately after Iraqi troops
withdrew from Kuwait, a Kuwaiti man entered the home of Ismail Farhat,
a Lebanese civil servant resident in Kuwait for almost 30 years,
and committed a horrible crime. Ismail Farhat and his youngest son,
Ossama, were shot and killed. His daughter Naimat was raped, shot
in the head, and left for dead.
Miraculously, Naimat survived and came to the United States, where
she has been cared for by her brother Naim in Santa Cruz, California.
After this brutal assault on his family, Naim Farhat set out on
a personal quest for justice. For the past three years, he has campaigned
and struggled, see those responsible for this attack convicted and
punished. Thanks largely to Naim's extraordinary personal commitment,
in December 1993 a former Kuwaiti police officer was convicted of
murder and attempted murder of members of the Farhat family. This
to date is the only conviction brought against a Kuwaiti national
for the many crimes and human rights abuses suffered by nonKuwaiti
Arabs in Kuwait in the months after the Iraqi withdrawal.
However, the case is far from over. The defense has lodged an appeal
against the conviction. Meanwhile, Naim. is pursuing his belief,
backed up by the research of numerous independent human rights organizations,
that others were involved in the attack and should also be brought
to justice. Naim is also seeking compensation from the Kuwaiti authorities
for the injuries suffered by his family in Kuwait, so far without
success.
The attention which Naim Farhat has generated for his family's
case has helped to keep alive the issue of gross violations of human
rights suffered by hundreds of non-Kuwaiti Arabs in the months after
Iraqi withdrawal. The small victory he has won in the Kuwaiti courts
gives hope to hundreds of others who are seeking justice for the
abuses they and their families suffered.
In pursuing justice for his family, Nairn Farhat has spent tens
of thousands of dollars of his own money. Although numerous medical
professionals donated their time to treat Naimat for her horrific
injuries, he has accumulated medical bills. On April 8, 1994 he
received a final demand for payment of $18,249.95 to Mills Peninsula
Hospitals Corporation. If he does not pay, he risks losing his house.
Without funds, he cannot continue his campaign for justice.
Naim, Farhat has made a unique contribution to the cause of human
rights for some of the forgotten victims of the Gulf war. He has
stood courageously for the principle that those who commit egregious
human rights violations must be held accountable for their crimes.
I am asking your readers to come to the assistance of Naim, Farhat
and his family, Any and all contributions will be put to good use
by Nairn as he continues his campaign for justice for his sister,
his family and victims of the Gulf war.
Neil Hicks, Coordinator, Middle East and North Africa Program,
Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, 330 Seventh Ave., 10th floor,
New York, NY 10001
Washington Report readers know Naim Farhat well as a result
of his campaign for justice (seep. 94, Sept./Oct. 1993 issue). The
courage he and his permanently disabled sister exhibited in returning
to Kuwait and, supported by then U. S. Ambassador to Kuwait Edward
(Skip) Gnehm, identifying her Kuwaiti policeman attacker in open
court, has advanced the cause of justice for all of the victims.
Mr. Farhat and his American-born wife and daughter now are paying
a personal price for their compassion and courage. They are in danger
of losing their home as they wait for indemnities which may never
come from the government of Kuwait for the medical expenses incurred
in the U. S. for Naimat Farhat's treatment. Readers are invited
to send contributions to Naim Farhat, c/o the Lawyer's Committee
address above, or send them directly to Naim Farhat, 214 Mountain
View Ave., Santa Cruz, CA 95062 or telephone him at (408) 423 0209.
Bias and Morality
William Safire's unabashed prejudice against the Palestinians and
Arabs has become part of his image. However, I could hardly believe
my eyes when I read his oped essay in The New York Times on
Thursday, April 7, 1994.
This was an attack on the government of Singapore for violating
Webster's definition of torture as "the infliction of intense
pain (as from burning, crushing or wounding) to punish, coerce,
or afford sadistic pleasure. " He considered the six lashes
against an American teenager, pursuant to a court sentence, an act
of savagery and a violation of the U. N. Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, which declares that "No one shall be subjected to torture
or to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment. "
I loved Mr. Safire's conclusion that "If anything in life
is morally wrong, torture is morally wrong. " My only question
to Mr. Safire is why has he withheld such condemnation in connection
with the documented torture by Israel of thousands of Palestinians
including young men and women? Such torture (sometimes resulting
in death) was not even part of a court punishment, but was inflicted
in gruesome investigations by the police, by the Shin Bet and the
Mossad to extract confessions. Early in the intifada didn't Rabin
himself order the breaking of bones of demonstrating young men?
Where has Mr. Safire left his credibility on the question of torture?
Shukri Salameh, Jacksonville, FL
The same place he left his credibility on anything to do with
Israel, or those whom he perceives to be critics of Israel, like
George Bush. During the 1992 election year "Republican "
Safire attacked the Bush administration over the issue of "Iraqgate
" with 20 separate columns based upon rumor and innuendo, none
of which turned out to be true, according to an article by Kenneth
Juster in the Spring 1994 issue of Foreign Policy. Safire
is so allconsumed by his apologetics for Israel that he apparently
never recognized how hypocritical his denunciations of state-sponsored
torture in Singapore sounded to regular readers of his columns on
Israel, where torture (euphemistically described as "mild physical
coercion ") is sanctioned by law and is used in all arrests
of Palestinians in the occupied territories. They are beaten when
they are arrested, routinely and severely beaten while being transported
to the police station, and then systematically tortured to elicit
false confessions which then serve as the excuse for their incarceration.
How Can I Help Bosnia?
I should have written you months ago asking for information about
how I can get involved and somehow contribute something to ending
the genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. But I am writing now because
I can no longer stand by and do nothing.
If there is some contribution that I can make—whether writing,
witnessing, licking envelopes—that will help end this war,
I would like to know. Thanks for your help.
C. MaudeGembler, Syracuse, NY
We have received a number of questions like yours. Below are
some of the groups which have contacted us in recent months. Your
best bet is to contact them directly.
- Citizens Human Conservancy, P. 0. Box 1852, Semmes, AL 365
75
- Bosnia-Herzegovina Relief Fund, 75 Birmingham St., Toronto,
Etobicoke, Ontario M8V2C3
- American Bosnian-Herzegovinian Assoc., 38564 Harbor Lane,
Clinton Township, M! 48038, tel. (313) 769 7866, fax (313) 9714968
- Women for Women in Bosnia, P. 0. Box 9733, Alexandria, VA
22304, (703) 5191730
- Equality Now, P.O. Box 20646, Columbus Circle Station, New
York, NY 10019, tel. And fax (212) 5860906
- Madre (Women's Peace Network), 121 West 27th St., Room 301,
New York, NY 10001, tel. (212) 6270444, fax (212) 6753704
- Center for Constitutional Rights, 666 Broadway, New York,
NY.10012, tel. (212) 6146424, fax (212) 6146499
- American Task Force for Bosnia, 1212 New York Ave., NW,
Suite 300, Wash., DC 20005, tel. (202) 8421840, fax (202) 8421614.
|