June 1994, Page 29
What is the Solution to the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict?Two
Views
Armenian View
Peace Depends Upon Security For the People of
Nagorno-Karabakh
By Ambassador Rouben Shugarian
The autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh was formally placed under
Azerbaijani jurisdiction by Josef Stalin in 1923, without the consent
of either the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh or of Armenia itself.
Since that time, Karabakh has been wholly contained within the borders
of Azerbaijan and the Armenian population has suffered under the
heavy hand of cultural, ethnic and economic discrimination.
In 1988, the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh began petitioning Moscow
for greater cultural, political and economic autonomy. This request
angered Azerbaijan and touched off a violent and deadly campaign
of massacres, torture, deportations and military conquests of areas
populated by Armenians throughout Azerbaijan, including Nagorno-Karabakh.
A blockade was imposed and maintained on Nagorno-Karabakh.
When the Soviet Union disintegrated, the Soviet constitution, which
was the only international guarantee for the security of the residents
of Karabakh, was abolished. The government of Azerbaijan unilaterally
took legislative action to dissolve the borders of Nagorno-Karabakh.
Given their long history of suffering from discrimination, as well
as the fate of the Armenians deported from the Nakhichevan Autonomous
Republic, the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh have justifiable fears
that without formal recognition of their separate status, they will
lose all protection for their culture, language and traditions.
The Republic of Armenia has extended humanitarian, moral and diplomatic
aid to Nagorno-Karabakh, and has paid a heavy price for its actions.
Azerbaijan, with the assistance of Turkey, has imposed a complete
blockade of railways, roads and pipelines into Armenia, devastating
its economy. There is no international law which justifies Azerbaijan's
blockade of Armenia.
While Armenia does have a moral and material responsibility toward
the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, it does not and cannot speak
on behalf of the population of Karabakh. In 1992, the Nagorno-Karabakh
parliament declared an independent Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh.
Despite its calls for international recognition, to date no country,
including Armenia, has recognized this unilateral declaration. Armenia
has sought to avoid becoming embroiled in a war with Azerbaijan
begun on the pretext of its recognition of Karabakh, and believes
that any attempt to determine the ultimate status of Karabakh before
the establishment of a cease-fire in the region would be premature
and would harm peace negotiations.
Once the cease-fire is ultimately established and negotiations
between Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan over the status of Nagorno-Karabakh
commenced, the Republic of Armenia will accept any peaceful solution
that will be agreed upon between the direct parties to the conflict-Azerbaijan
and Nagorno-Karabakh.
The obvious imbalance in the populations of Karabakh and Azerbaijan,
roughly 150,000 and 7 million respectively, diminishes the prospects
of the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians successfully protecting their
enclave for the long term. The imbalance has also had an impact
on the military tactics adopted by the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians.
To avoid the uninterrupted shelling of their territory by Azerbaijani
forces and to confront the enemy with their limited manpower, the
Nagorno-Karabakh forces have had to create "safe corridors"
around their borders. The Karabakh forces have no legal basis to
retain permanent control of these territories, but have linked their
withdrawal to receiving guarantees from the international community
that peace-keeping forces and observers will be sent to the region
to ensure the long-term security of Karabakh.
The Armenian government has made a concerted effort to petition
the international community, particularly the Conference on Security
and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) and the United Nations, to become
actively involved in finding a peaceful solution to the conflict.
Armenia has emphasized that the shortest way to peace would be a
negotiated settlement involving the representatives of Nagorno-Karabakh.
Until recently, Azerbaijan staunchly refused to recognize or meet
with representatives of Nagorno-Karabkah in any forum. Thus one
of the most positive developments in the course of the conflict
occurred just months ago when representatives of Karabakh and Azerbaijan
met face-to-face for the first time. Bilateral meetings have continued
since then, resulting in the negotiation of a series of cease-fires.
In February 1994, the speakers of the parliaments of Armenia and
Azerbaijan held a preliminary meeting on the Armenian-Azeri border.
No documents were signed, but a number of general issues, including
implementation of the recent CSCE and Russian peace initiatives
and Azerbaijani acceptance of a Karabakh representative in future
talks, were discussed.
The Armenian government views the establishment of a cease-fire
and the lifting of all blockades as the first stage of a two-step
process, and believes that international guarantees must be secured
to ensure a durable cease-fire. In addition, the international community
must play a central role in the second stage of the negotiations
to resolve the legal questions regarding the ultimate status of
Nagorno-Karabakh.
The U.S. and Russia must take the lead in the search for constructive
ways to achieve a peaceful, negotiated settlement. The Russian government
was the first to recognize the importance of bilateral talks between
the two parties directly involved in the conflict, while the U.S.
can help ensure that any peace settlement will be durable, enforceable
and guaranteed by the international community.
Rouben Shugarian is ambassador of the Republic of Armenia to
the United States. |