June 1989, Page 6
War in Lebanon
"We Are All Good Lebanese"
By Hala Maksoud
(The following is excerpted from a talk delivered to the national
convention of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee on
April 15, 1989.)
Lebanon is bleeding; it is at the brink of disaster, Divisive language,
policies, and ideologiesseem to have won the day. Armed illusions
are raining terror on the Lebanese population. Irrationality and
extremism are stifling attempts at rationalism and moderation.
True, this war showed the barbarism and antiquated ideology of
some, but it also showed the heroism and steadfastness of the population
at large. It showed the resilience of the Lebanese and their unabated
attachment to the whole of Lebanon, not only geographically but
also to what it means in terms of values, namely those of human
integration, tolerance, pluralism, equality, and freedom.
Since September, two governments have been competing for allegiance
in Lebanon, yet Lebanese institutions remained unified despite the
pressure from armed militias. The parliament, although divested
of many of its functions and no more truly representative, is still
the institution people look to elect a president and to legislate,
and is still functioning and legislating. The Central Bank, the
diplomatic missions, and the services in general have kept their
unity to a large extent, through ingenious processes devised by
Lebanese civil servants committed to remaining in place as the yeast
of what should be.
From that perspective, one cannot but salute Prime Minister Salim
el-Hoss who refused to lose his nerve and join in the divisive enterprise,
sometimes at the cost of alienating his own constituency. He acted
as the true mother of the child, showing a willingness to accommodate
and compromise rather than let his child be divided. And by doing
so, he was articulating the true feelings of most Lebanese who insist
on the unity of Lebanon and are willing to suffer to preserve it.
Sounds of divisive sectarian forces are deafening but true voices
of harmony are the precursors of the future. Those who refuse to
be part of these divisive policies are attacked and accused of cowardice
by those who want all Lebanese to participate in the collective
madness. Yet, there is no heroism in standing behind a tank and
firing at innocent civilians.
If there has been any heroism in Lebanon during these 15 years,
it was in 1982 when the Lebanese resisted the Israeli invasion and
stopped its advances on Beirut for 80 days. It was also when, under
the duress of occupation and pressure from the US government, they
achieved the abrogation of the May 17 agreement and reversed the
trend of Israeli hegemony over Lebanon. If there is heroism now,
it is in the actions of the Lebanese resistance in south Lebanon
against Israeli occupation.
Commitment to the Whole of Lebanon
Commitment to the whole of Lebanon now might sound discordant to
some, yet it is a worthwhile human commitment. Such a commitment
is not only to the geographic area, which is important, but more
importantly to the pluralistic values which Lebanon represents.
The existence of a Lebanon where 17 sects coexist and cohabitate
is the civilized answer to the Zionist ideology which proclaims
that the Jew cannot exercise his Jewishness except in a Jewish state.
Fifteen years after the beginning of this war, We Lebanese are
sickened by what is. We have become observers, witnesses to the
destruction of our country and its further disintegration and fragmentation,
yearning for law and order. Fifteen years ago, Lebanese, from whatever
political spectrum they came, could provide reasons to explain the
bloodshed. The reasons were different depending on what Lebanese
one talked to, yet they could be articulated in political, ideological,
economic, and other terms.
Now, however, the original purposes have somehow been lost. Many
former ideological positions have been turned to gangsterism and
banditry. They have managed to put rationality on the defensive.
We tend to blame the other, to perceive things in terms of grand
conspiracies woven against us. Of course, some of it is true. Of
course, Lebanon has turned into an arena where big accounts are
being settled. Of course, Israel has a stake in showing that pluralistic
experiences do not work. But it is too easy to blame the other and
exonerate ourselves. We owe it to ourselves and to the next generation
to be harsh in our self-criticism and to admit that we also allowed
a lot of what happened to happen.
We should admit that we did not create a system flexible enough
to accommodate the new changes that were taking place. In fact,
some resisted and still resist change or reform to preserve their
own privileges. They do not realize that the privilege of one means
the denial of the right of the other and that this is unacceptable.
They act as the custodians of Lebanon and argue that anyone asking
for change in the system is not a good Lebanese. This attempt at
putting us on the defensive by dividing us into good Lebanese and
bad Lebanese should be rejected outright. We are all good Lebanese.
Some of us were probably too idealistic. But then we really thought
we could affect a total transformation of our society. We were dissatisfied
with the Lebanese experience because we wanted more. We wanted the
total secularization of the Lebanese body politic and of the Lebanese
institutions. These demands seem so remote now with the rise to
prominence of the communal militias and the regression of the secular
forces.
In many ways, the growth of sectarianism in Lebanon, and perhaps
throughout the region, has been a penalty for the intellectual laziness
and the political self-righteousness of the secular and progressive
forces in our midst. We owe it to the hundreds of thousands who
have lost their lives or are scarred forever to launch a creative
new attempt to recapture a rational Lebanon and reestablish a proper
secular discourse where there will be no place for the sickening
political language that now prevails. Obscurantists, from whatever
religion they are, should be isolated from the mainstream of humanist
Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.
Yearning for Peace
The Lebanese are a tired and exasperated people. Whatever might
be their convictions or strongly held views, they yearn for peace
and unity. In many ways, the resilience of the Lebanese is dying
out. This situation is compounded by the economy which is in shambles,
the infrastructure of the country which is being destroyed, and
the devastating run on the Lebanese pound.
It is of utmost importance to realize how vital are symbolic gestures
to Lebanon now. Lebanon has allowed itself to be used as a stage
by many different players. It is high time this is stopped and that
the continued interest of the world in Lebanon translates itself
in discouraging the divisive elements and in helping the Lebanese
reconstruct their country and heal their wounds. We do not need
any more military assistance. Let those who want to help provide
economic assistance. That is needed and will help the Lebanese shed
their feelings of loneliness, isolation, and despondency. From that
perspective, the Arab League's new initiative in Lebanon, although
late, is welcome. It should however be articulated more clearly
and the efforts should be intensified. They should listen to all
parties in the Lebanese conflict, but that does not mean that they
should not take a position between right and wrong. There are many
wrong positions but there is only one right one—supporting
the territorial integrity and independence of a pluralistic, democratic,
and Arab Lebanon.
We Lebanese have suffered enough. The cold statistics of the human
tragedy that has been played on the Lebanese scene for the last
15 years are staggering. The immediate task is to stop the madness
and alleviate the suffering; but the real challenge is to remove
the causes for this suffering on all levels.
Dr. Hala Maksoud, a Muslim Lebanese who holds a PhD from Georgetown
University, is a founder and former president of the Arab Women's
Council in Washington, DC. Her uncle, Saeb Salam, was a former prime
minister of Lebanon. Her husband, Dr. Clovis Maksoud, a Christian,
is Arab League ambassador to the United Nations. |