June 1989, Page 3
A Personal Reminiscence
What the US Can & Can't Do in Lebanon
By Richard H. Curtiss
"Lebanon has been battered by 14 years of civil war, an Israeli
invasion and a seemingly endless cycle of factional feuding in which
at least 150,000 people have been killed and 1 million people—one
quarter of the population—displaced." —Associated
Press, May, 1989.
I first saw Lebanon on a mild evening in November 1958, when I
flew in from Turkey with a printing order for the US Information
Agency plant that once was in East Beirut. The Americans who met
me at the airport described over a drink in the bar of the Commodore
Hotel the just-completed withdrawal of US Marines that marked the
end of the brief civil war that had gripped the country throughout
the summer of 1958.
I hadn't eaten and, after my hosts left, I walked out of the hotel
looking for a coffee shop or snack bar. The streets were dark and
suddenly gunfire erupted. I looked for a shop to duck into, but
every door was locked. I became so disoriented that, for 15 frantic
minutes, I couldn't even find my way back to the hotel. When I finally
burst into the lobby I asked the night clerk: Who's doing all the
shooting? I thought your war was over."
"Probably the Armenians," he answered casually. I went
to bed hungry.
In 1962, when I was assigned to the Arabic language school in the
American Embassy in West Beirut, my family and I moved into a pleasant
apartment in the middle of the city. The rent was low because it
was right on the line that had divided the Christians and Muslims
during the 1958 shootout. "If it starts again," the Syrian
building owner said cheerily, "you'll be okay unless you stand
shaving in front of an open window like one of my tenants did, or
take a wrong turn toward a roadblock instead of away from it like
an Englishman across the street did. They were both killed."
We had a pleasant year and a half in a quiet Beirut, although I
didn't loiter in front of open windows and I was careful to know
exactly where I wanted to go whenever I drove the car. I learned
which neighborhoods were inhabited (separately) by Druze, Sunni
and Shia Muslims and which predominantly by Maronite, Orthodox,
and Melchite Christians. Also which streets, blocks or neighborhoods
were enclaves for Kurds, Jews, Armenians and Assyrians. Only in
the West Beirut neighborhoods that had grown up around the American
University of Beirut were the religious communities mixed.
Just like Beirut's traditional neighborhoods, the Lebanese government
was organized according to a sectarian mosaic system, only a step
removed from feudalism. It had worked when Ottoman Turks ruled the
Middle East, although there had been massacres and communal fighting
between Druze and Maronites in the Shuf and Mount Lebanon in 1841,
1845 and 1860. At the breakup of the Ottoman Empire during World
War I, the French had taken over Syria and carved out Lebanon as
a Christian enclave. In an excess of generosity they had attached
to the Christian state-to-be large Muslim areas, so that at the
time Lebanon achieved its independence in 1943, Christians were
no longer so clearly in the majority. The 1958 fighting had been
the first warning that Muslims, who had a higher birthrate, were
no longer content with a system which gave a six-to-five edge in
parliament and government positions to Christians, who had a higher
emigration rate.
We returned to Beirut in 1969 and took a seafront apartment for
the school year so that our children could attend the American school
there, while I shuttled between the Voice of America Arabic programming
center in Greece, and its Cairo and Beirut subcenters. To the growing
demographic disparity a new element had been added—heavily
armed Palestinian commandos.
Palestinians entered the calculations of Lebanese politicians when
the first wave of refugees, barred by Israelis from returning to
their homes after the 1948 fighting, inundated Lebanon. At first
wealthy Christians from Haifa or Jerusalem found few problems obtaining
Lebanese citizenship. Then, there were periods when Sunni Muslim
Palestinians also were permitted to obtain the identity cards that
turned them, technically, into Lebanese.
It was not the Palestinians who became Lebanese who preoccupied
the politicians, however, but the predominantly Muslim masses in
squalid refugee camps on the outskirts of Beirut, Tripoli and Sidon.
If Lebanon's Maronite leaders eyed them uneasily, they represented
opportunity to Muslim politicians.
Strikes and curfews cast shadows over my visits to the family in
Beirut. The issue was whether the fighters recruited from the camps
by the various Palestinian commando groups would be allowed to carry
their weapons. Just before we moved to Greece, in 1970, at a Lebanese-Palestinian
meeting in Cairo, it was agreed they would not, except in the area
of the Israeli border.
In 1973 we moved back joyously to what our children, who had been
boarders at the American Community School while we were in Greece,
considered their "hometown." By then, however, it was
a very different Beirut.
On Sundays there were huge traffic jams as the Lebanese, in their
new Dodges and Mercedes, thronged out of town to the beaches, mountain
villages, and archeological splendors that, along with its Mediterranean
climate, made Lebanon a paradise for all who could afford it. Beirut's
population also was swollen with job seekers from the villages of
Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan. In summer, mountain resorts filled with
vacationers from all over the Arab world. As the economy grew, so
did the gulf between the haves and have nots.
As for gun-toting, the Cairo agreement was forgotten after Israelis
made two highly visible raids into the heart of Beirut. On the first
they blew up all of the commercial jetliners on the tarmac at Beirut
airport.
On the second raid in April 1973, only three months before our
return, Israelis disguised as foreign tourists had rented cars for
"hit squads" which then drove by night to the apartments
of three PLO officials and assassinated them, along with neighbors
who opened their doors to see what was happening. The Israelis had
departed by sea, taking with them whatever confidence the Palestinians
might have had that Lebanese authorities could or would protect
them in Beirut. Uniformed Palestinians now carried their sidearms
and Kalashnikovs openly, as did soldiers of the proliferating Christian,
or "rightist," and predominantly Muslim, or "leftist,"
militias.
For me, as US Embassy spokesman, every day brought a new problem.
Did the US have any idea who was responsible for mysterious arms
caches that turned up along Lebanon's coasts? Did the US have any
comment on the latest Israeli jet strikes on Palestinian refugee
camps, teeming with children, whose crushed and torn bodies were
pictured over and over again in the newspapers? We were even shown
booby-trapped toys allegedly found in the camps after raids. Were
they actually dropped by the Israeli planes, or were they placed
there by local provocateurs? To mutilated children, it would if
t make any difference. To journalists, however, it would provide
clues as to who was behind the spiraling violence in this country
which was still home to 25,000 Americans.
Our oldest British friend in Beirut was the first foreigner to
die when Lebanon's civil war broke out in earnest in 1975. When
he and a Canadian school teacher foolishly tried to cross at night
from "leftist" into "rightist" territory, he
was stabbed to death and his companion gang-raped and then released
to tell the tale. Clearly those who perpetrated this atrocity, and
dozens like it, committed against both Lebanese and Palestinians,
wanted to heat up the spiral of horrors.
They mounted rapidly. Every morning there were new bodies, victims
of the Maronites, under bridges in their parts of town. At the same
time, ambulances were picking up bodies dropped by Muslim and Palestinian
militiamen over a cliff overlooking the sea in West Beirut.
Perhaps 60,000 people were killed in the first year and a half
of fighting the vast majority in one city, Beirut. The massacre
by Maronites of Palestinians at the Tel Zaatar camp in East Beirut
seemed just a footnote at the time. As the last Palestinian fighters
surrendered, the Maronite militiamen attached ropesto them and then
dragged them, alive at first, behind their cars until they reached
the bridge over the Dog river where the bodies were dumped.
The saga of Tel Zaatar's doomed defenders became a rallying point
for Palestinians, strengthening their resolve to brave any odds
until they haw a homeland of their own. These were the role models
for today's "children of the stones."
Our embassy was literally in the Muslim front lines, I still didn't
stand in front of my office windows, though they were armored with
mylar which could at least deflect a bullet. And, on one occasion
when I was in a car that took a wrong turn into a roadblock, the
vehicle was so heavily armored that the bullets literally just glanced
off the inch-thick glass windshield.
After visits to East Beirut, newsmen frequently asked where the
Maronites were getting their "brand new" American weapons.
"We don't know anything about it," I would insist, truthfully.
Then our ambassador, G. McMurtrie (Mac) Godley, whose physical
courage was matched only by his rock-ribbed integrity, returned
from a meeting called by Henry Kissinger in Amman with chiefs of
US missions in the Middle East. The US government, Godley said ruefully,
did seem to know a good deal more about the weapons being used by
the Maronites than anyone had told us in Beirut. It was, unfortunately,
not United States dosed its eyes to transfers of American arms by
Israel to countries or clients whose aims are not in harmony with
ours.
Uniquely, in Lebanon's civil war the telephone lines between the
two sides remained intact, and US officials used them, and hazardous
visits across the lines, to warn Maronite leaders, repeatedly, that
no matter what trouble they got into, the US would not bail them
out. The Christian leaders thought otherwise. They escalated, and
so, probably, did unseen hands in the Muslim camp.
One day, at a meeting of the now tiny embassy staff, a shell struck
so close that everyone leaped out of his seat. As we settled down
again, Bob Waring, the economic counselor, remarked that this was
the strangest assignment he had ever had. "Every morning you
think, 'Shall I go to work and perhaps be killed or call in sick
and live?... Bob, who never called in sick andhad already voluntarily
extended his tour of duty by a fourth year, was kidnapped and killed
two months later in West Beirut, along with Ambassador Francis Meloy,
whohad been in the country only six weeks, and their Lebanese driver.
My family's tour in Beirut had ended in October 1975 when dependents
and much of the embassy staff were evacuated. By the time my own
tour of duty ended in May, 1976, a new scenario had developed. Whereas
most of the combat had been a matter of pouring artillery, mortar,
and small arms fire into neighborhoods "across the line,"
now Christian towns and villages in the mountains were actually
failing into Druze or Palestinian hands.
The Arab League gave the Syrians a mandate to go in and restore
order as the vanguard of an Arab League force, and the US promised
to secure guarantees from Israel that it would not attack the Syrians.
The Israelis were reluctant to agree. I suppose they finally gave
in because they realized the Maronites, whom they had encouraged
and armed throughout the fighting, were actually on the verge of
losing the war. Clearly Israel wanted a stalemate and partition
to keep Christian Lebanon as a tiny non-Islamic confessional state
in the Middle East—like Israel.
The rest is history. Over 14 years the Syrians have fought both
for and against virtually every militia on both sides, except the
several they have controlled or created themselves. The Israelis
made their own terrifying move against the Palestinians in 1982.
They turned Beirut into an even greater hell than the one I remembered,
and 20,000 Lebanese and Palestinians died. The Sabra Shatila massacre
of Palestinians by Israeli-armed and supported Maronite militias
succeeded Tel Zaatar in Middle Eastern history books. US Marine
actions in Beirut in 1982 and 1983, in which some 260 Americans
died, succeeded 1958 in US military annals.
Both before and after I retired from the foreign service I was
able to visit Beirut occasionally between rounds of fighting. During
a brief visit my wife and I made to the embassy on an AID-funded
project in 1983, I saw many of my former Lebanese and Palestinian
colleagues. By chance, our friend Malcolm Kerr was being sworn in
as president of the American University of Beirut and we attended
the ceremony on an AUB campus that looked almost unscathed from
the years of warfare.
Two months later, many of the colleagues I had just seen were among
the 63 killed when the embassy was blown up as they were having
lunch. So was the American AID officer with whom I'd dealt. So,
eventually, was Malcolm Kerr, one of America's most prominent Arabists,
who had spent his life explaining the Middle East to his countrymen.
This deliberate assassination of a particularly sympathetic American
sent a message, probably from Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, to Americans:
Stop just expressing pious hopes that in the future US relations
with Muslims and Arabs will again match the glory days of the past.
You are no longer welcome here until your policies match your words.
It's a warning we must heed. So long as, for domestic political
reasons, we arm and encourage Israel in its unwillingness to accept
the two-state, land-for-peace solution now being offered by Yasser
Arafat and virtually the entire Arab world, we will be perceived
as Israel's mentor by Israel's victims.
We should back international, not unilateral, action in Lebanon,
but can no longer really be part of it. The Lebanese need political
reform so that they, like Americans, all have equal rights. One
person, one vote. Lebanon needs a constitution that will safeguard
its unique pluralism. Lebanese Christians should not have to worry
that they will ever be subject to Islamic law. Lebanese Muslims
should not have to worry that their country will ever turn its back
on its Arab and Islamic heritage. A democratic, secular, neutral
Lebanon with full and equal protection for all of its minorities
is not too much to ask.
Perhaps peace will be obtained through a package deal providing
for internationally supervised elections, a new constitution, and
withdrawal of all foreign forces, all in a pre-agreed order.
The most constructive contribution the US can make to Lebanon is
to get on with a Palestinian-Israeli peace. All Lebanese believe
that Iranian, Israeli, Iraqi, Syrian, Libyan, and other foreign
hands are fighting their battles by proxy through Lebanese militias
on Lebanese soil. It is time to end those battles most of which
stem from the Palestinian-Israeli dispute. That dispute will end
only when the US brings its Israeli client to heel, and it is there
that the US should concentrate its efforts. Until it does, there
will be no peace in Israel, no peace in Palestine, and—almost
certainly—no peace in Lebanon.
|