Washington Report, June 18, 1984, Page 2
Editorial Policy
U.S.: Next Year in Jerusalem?
It is hard to believe at this late date—after scores of credible
experts have told Congress that American lives will be at risk throughout
the Muslim world if the U.S. moves its embassy in Israel from Tel
Aviv to Jerusalem—that Congressional resolutions demanding
that the Administration do that very thing are still high on the
agenda. But they are, and have very good chance of passage.
We realize, of course, that the possibility that blood may flow
should not always deter the U.S. from the defense of its security
and its values. But leaving the embassy where it is will certainly
not endanger our country—whereas moving it could not only
cause security problems but would also be in conflict with U.S.
values, rather than in support of them. The move would violate the
long-standing American pledge not to recognize a forcible, unilateral
takeover of any part of Jerusalem by either Israel or the Arabs.
Many arguments are being put forward on the Hill as to why the
U. S. should break this commitment, but the one that seems to get
the biggest hearing goes something like this: "A country should
be allowed to have its capital anywhere it wants, shouldn't it?"
The Road from Danzig
Well, now—is that so? We're wondering how Congressmen might
have felt about this proposition if, say, Hitler had said he wanted
to turn Danzig, or Strasbourg, or even Vienna into the capital of
the Third Reich, for historic and ethnic reasons. Or how they would
react today if Muammar Qadhafi claimed that the new capital of Libya
was now Faya-Largeau, in the Arabic speaking northern region of
Chad which he now occupies. Or if the Soviet Union announced that
its new capital was Kabul.
These might seem to be far-fetched examples, but they're really
not. Israel established West Jerusalem as its capital within a year
or so of having accepted a U.N. partition plan which specifically
excluded Jerusalem from being part of either a Jewish state or an
Arab state in Palestine. Later, it captured East Jerusalem and annexed
it, making the whole city its capital—despite additional,
U.S.-supported resolutions in the United Nations calling upon Israel
to negotiate with the Arabs over territory. Of all the world's nations,
only Costa Rica and El Salvador, by moving their embassies to Jerusalem,
have been willing to show acceptance of Israel's use of force to
impose its will in Jerusalem. The U.S. should stand tall, not small,
by keeping its embassy just where it is. |