May/June 1996, pgs. 62-68
Muslim-American Activism
CAIR Documents U.S. Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes
With police and terrorism experts quick to blame Islamic
extremists, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the weeks that followed
proved to be one of the low points in the American Muslim experience.
For several days after the bombing, Muslims were accused of bombing
the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and an Arab-American was detained
as a suspect in the case. The Council on American Islamic Relations
(CAIR) has shown that these false accusations not only tarnished
perceptions of Muslims in America, they also led to verbal and violent
attacks. The episode prompted CAIR to begin making a detailed account
of anti-Muslim hate crimes in America. The findings were released
April 19, 1996, exactly one year after the Oklahoma City bombing.
The report, entitled The Price of Ignorance, documents 300
cases of anti-Muslim incidents in the year following the bombing.
According to CAIR, there were 39 cases of rights violations, 169
incidents of verbal abuse, 59 threats of violence and 29 violent
attacks on Muslims. All these incidents are classified as hate
crimes because they were committed solely because the victim
was Muslim.
The most alarming trend in these numbers is that, while verbal
abuse and threats of violence have gone down since the bombing,
the actual incidents of violence have increased, said Mohamed
Nimer, a CAIR researcher and the reports author. He and CAIR
believe the root cause of all these offenses against Muslims is
a general ignorance of Muslims, their religion and their culture.
Whether its in the schools or the work place, people
lack the knowledge of what is required of them to accommodate Muslim
culture, Nimer added.
A seeming example of this ignorance occurred April 8, when a Northern
Virginia women was told she could not be hired because she wore
her hijab head scarf. At a press conference to discuss the
incident, Hanem Zahwy said she interviewed for a part-time desk
clerk position at the Quality Inn Governor in Falls Church, VA.
She was not offered the job during the interview, but the manager
later called her and said she could report to work the next morning,
but without the head part.
I told him that I am a Muslim and every Muslim woman has
to cover her hair, Zahwy said. This is part of me and
this is what I believe.
Zahwy, a mother of two from Egypt, said she was willing to change
her head scarf to a color that matched the uniform, but it was clear
the manager didnt want the scarf on at all.
The hotel owner said the scarf would violate the hotels
policy on employee uniforms, but CAIR found that federal laws
prohibit such policies if they do not accommodate religious practices.
With this information, the woman filed a law suit against the Quality
Inn Governor.
CAIR held a protest and press conference in front of the hotel
April 15. This and subsequent public pressure forced the hotel owner
to settle the case out of court. CAIR announced April 19 that the
Quality Inn Governor agreed to issue a formal apology to Zahwy and
hire her for the part-time job. It also agreed to provide back pay
from the time she was supposed to be hired and to pay all her legal
fees from the case.
Nimer pointed out, however, that not all discrimination cases turn
out so well. According to his findings, 40 percent of all Muslim
victims of hate crimes never take action against the offenders.
He said this inaction is usually due to a lack of legal and financial
resources. There is also a lack of organized groups that can advise
Muslims on their legal and political rights. Muslim-Americans
have maintained a low profile in this country, Nimer said,
but they are now emerging with the increased recognition and
growth of Islam in America.
He added that, especially in this time of increased visibility,
Muslim Americans must work to educate and reach out to other segments
of American society.
Anti-Muslim sentiment seems to thrive on the American publics
general ignorance of Islam and the American Muslim experience,
Nimer added.
Geoff Lumetta |