Washington Report, May 16, 1983, Page 8
Personality
George W. Ball
The Honorable George W. Ball is not a specialist in
Middle East affairs. He has never held a job that dealt exclusively
with that region. Nor has he ever lived there. But there are very
few Americans who are called upon so often to give their views on
what is likely to happen in the Middle East—and when Mr. Ball
talks, people listen.
Not everyone agrees with him, of course. Many who are
fervent supporters of the policies of Israel's Begin government
regard him as hostile to the very existence of Israel. Mr. Ball,
however, who visits Israel from time to time and says he has many
good friends there in the political establishment, regards this
kind of criticism as nonsense, and shrugs it off.
"The Middle East policies which I advocate are
not anti-Israel—they are policies which I believe are in the
best interests of the U.S.," he says. "It so happens that
they would also be in the best interests of Israel itself."
Why They Listen
One reason Mr. Ball gets a close hearing on Middle East issues
is that he is not only a former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations
but served nearly six years as U.S. Undersecretary of State—which
at the time (January, 1961 through September, 1966) was the number-two
job in the State Department, the equivalent of today's Deputy Secretary.
Another reason people listen is that he is articulate, penetrating,
sometimes sardonic and always plainspoken—qualities which
are reflected in his frequent articles for the mass media and for
such publications as Foreign Affairs, and which make him a natural
for TV talk-shows and keynote speeches at foreign affairs gatherings.
Mr. Ball may well have appeared on NBC's Meet the Press more often
than any other guest during the more than 30 years the show has
been on the air, and is a frequent panelist on such other news programs
as public television's MacNeil-Lehrer Report and the David
Brinkley show. Asked whether he gets bothered by sharp questioning
from the likes of commentator George Will, who is an acknowledged
fierce partisan of the Begin government, Mr. Ball says with a twinkle:
"Why should I be bothered? Mr. Will has a constitutional right
to be wrong on some subjects."
Mr. Ball is now retired from his various careers as
public servant, lawyer and financial advisor—having finally
last October left his partnership in the Wall Street investment
banking firm of Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb, after telling the board
that he had discoverd there "were many books that I had neither
read nor written."
Mr. Ball now lives and works in Princeton, New Jersey,
from which he commutes to New York City on the average of one day
a week to keep in touch with friends and associates and to attend
a variety of functions. He travels abroad frequently but is also
finding time to work on a book dealing with the problems of nuclear
weapons and U.S.-Soviet relations.
It is this global perspective of Mr. Ball's that gives
him his absorbing interest in the Middle East. As he sees it, anyone
with a broad view of international relations and of the problems
of maintaining world peace must necessarily focus a great deal of
attention on the Middle East for obvious strategic and economic
reasons. But it is all part of a greater whole, with the pieces
fitting together. "Our policies on the Middle East bear intensely
on our relationships with Europe," he says. "And you can't,
of course, look on the Middle East in isolation from East-West problems—although
I think it was an enormous mistake during the early days of this
Administration for it to have regarded the East-West question as
the primary one in the area."
The Arab-Israeli conflict is, of course, the preeminent
one in Mr. Ball's view, and like many others he believes that Israel's
continuing settlement of the West Bank is a "disastrous"
policy which will lead only to protracted struggle and is damaging
to the interests of both the U.S. and Israel itself. Should the
U.S. "pressure" Israel to stop?
Subsidies for Israel
Answers Mr. Ball: "It confuses the issue to use the word 'pressure,'
because it implies that the subsidy which is being given to Israel
by the U.S. is something Israel is absolutely entitled to—that
we're somehow imposing on Israel's rights. The real question, though,
is not whether we should use 'pressure' on Israel by reducing aid;
it's whether we are prepared, as responsible citizens, to have our
money used to subsidize activities that are against our national
interests."
Mr. Ball was born in Iowa nearly 74 years ago, and after
taking B.A. and law degrees from Northwestern University he moved
to Washington during the early days of the New Deal to work as a
government lawyer, later practicing law in Chicago. After Pearl
Harbor he rejoined the government and served in a number of wartime
agencies. After the war he became founding partner of a law firm
in New York and was active in international law for several years
until returning to government service under President Kennedy, first
as Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs and then as the
Undersecretary. He is the author of three books. |