April/May 1994, Page 54
Speaking Out
Senate Inquisitors Air Strobe Talbott's Views
on Israel
By Paul Findley
"All fools aren't dead. Some of them aren't even sick."
This witticism comes to mind while observing the reaction of some
pro-Israel forces to President Clinton's nomination of Strobe Talbott
to be deputy secretary of state.
Usually clever and successful in staging publicity that casts
Israel in the best light possible, they have acted like juveniles
in a hopeless campaign to frustrate Talbott's approval by the U.
S. Senate.
As keen participants in our political process and experts on the
personalities that lead it, they must have known that Talbott would
easily win confirmation. The vote was 66 to 31. Instead of turning
the inevitable to the best advantage possible by ignoring his past
statements, they irritated the official they will want to influence
in the future and advertised widely the solid criticism of Israel
that he expressed years ago.
The result: Millions of Americans now know that President Clinton
has a deputy secretary of state who has publicly described the state
of Israel as an "outright liability ... .. heartless"
and "rather nasty and bitter."
A veteran byline writer for Time magazine, as well as longtime
friend and once the university roommate of Bill Clinton, Talbott
is now second only to Secretary of State Warren Christopher as the
American most influential in the world of diplomacy. He is the first
top diplomat on the public record recognizing that U.S. Jews wield
influence far beyond their numbers and describing Israel as a govermnent
that interferes successfully in U.S. politics.
Among the quotations widely circulated recently by U.S. Jewish
organizations are the following from a Talbott article in the Sept.
7, 1981 Time:
"The sad fact is that Israel is well on its way to becoming
not just a dubious asset but an outright liability to American security
interests, both in the Middle East and worldwide ...
"A policy aimed at inducing Israel to behave more compatibly
with American global interests ... might help rescue that [U.S.-Israel]
relationship from the mistrust, misunderstandings and misconceptions
that have begun to eat at its foundations-starting with the delusion
that Israel is, or ever has been, primarily a strategic ally ...
"Some of the [U.S.] aid is not critical to Israel's defense.
In fact it amounts to a subsidy to the Israeli defense industry
' which in turn sometimes competes with the U.S. on world markets...
"Israel sometimes seems to have taken on the visage and tone
of a rather nasty and bitter nation, even a violent one ... Israel
has been interfering skillfully and successfully in U.S. politics
for decades...
"It is high time for the U.S. to engage Israel in a debate
over the fundamental nature of their relationship. If that means
interfering in Israeli internal politics, then so be it."
On Oct. 10, 1990, Talbott wrote:
"Ariel Sharon ... is busily creating 'new facts,' in the form
of Jewish settlements on the West Bank. Saddam, too, is in the new-facts
business with his systematic obliteration of Kuwait nationhood.
"
Jewish organizations inspired Senate Republicans to engage in a
heavy attack against Talbott. Senator Jesse Helms, a Republican
who had sharply criticized Israel in the past but did a complete
turnabout after pro-Israel forces gave him election-day fits a decade
ago, displayed poster enlargements of the above quotations to television
cameras.
The unintended effect of the attack by supporters of Israel was
to bring Talbott's views to a far larger audience than he had achieved
through Time magazine articles in past years. The floor debate,
like the committee hearings, was broadcast in its entirety on nationwide
television.
In the committee hearings, Talbott understandably recanted a bit.
He declared, "I do want to set the record straight on the question
of my view of Israel as a strategic asset. On that I have simply
changed my opinion. " He said, "My core beliefs are also
that we have a special obligation for reasons not only rooted in
our moral obligation to Israel, but also rooted in our geopolitical
interests,to support the security of Israel."
A Far From Complete Turnabout
But Talbott's expressed turnabout was far from complete. He said
his observation that American Jews had power beyond their numbers
was "simply a statement of fact." He left most of his
past criticisms of Israel unrecanted.
In an editorial, the New York Post concluded: "The
ex-journalist's confirmation conversion wasn't, to be sure, remotely
convincing. The Time columns, after all, appeared under
his name and they reflect a consistent line of analysis." The
Post added: "The litany of mea culpas Talbott felt called
upon to recite ... proves only that he's highly anxious to secure
confirmation as deputy secretary of state."
Talbott's recanting aside, President Clinton now has a senior diplomat
and close friend who understands the threat to U.S. national interests
posed by Israel. He will be challenged, of course, by the assortment
of pro-Israel officials in high places, but understanding is the
first step toward wise policy.
Former Congressman Paul Findley is chairman of the Council for
the National Interest.
SIDEBAR
Living Under Israeli Occupation
The toll of human rights violations by Israeli forces since
Dec. 9, 1987
Deaths
1,283
Injuries requiring hospitalization
130,472*
Expulsions
481
Administrative detentions
22,088
Curfews (areas with 10,000+ population under
24-hour curfew)
14,997
(Plus almost constant curfews over entire West Bank and Gaza from
Jan. 16-Feb. 28, 1991)
Land confiscation (acres)
116,918
House demolitions/sealings
2,533
Tree uprootings
184,257
Source: Palestine Human Rights Information Center, Jerusalem/Washington,
(202) 686-5116 Preliminary figures through Dec. 31, 1993.
*Estimated number |