April/May 1994, Page 33
Myths and Facts
(In refuting myths about the Middle East, sometimes one doesn't
have to look beyond the media that help perpetuate them.)
Is There a "Moral Difference" Between Israeli
and Palestinian "Terrorism"?
Myth: "The world is not content to judge Goldstein.
It is judging Israel because of Goldstein. Yet what, in fact, is
the moral difference between Israeli and Palestinian terrorism?
For Israel, it is a matter of shame. For the Palestinians it is
a matter of policy."
Columnist Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post, March
4, 1994
Fact: "There's no doubt that the revulsion, shame
and concern expressed by Rabin's government and most Israelis over
that atrocity are genuine and deep. The fact remains that the government
has yet to take measures appropriate to the basic threat raised
by a militant Israeli minority not just against the safety of Palestinians,
but against the government's own peace policy ... It's no secret
that the most militant among Israel's 120,000 settlerslike
the most militant in the Palestinian campare eager to wreck
the peace process. The Rabin government is courting grief if it
doesn't move quickly to neutralize this sedition."
Los Angeles Times editorial, March 3, 1994
Was Goldstein Temporarily Insane?
Myth: "Last Thursday night, during a Purim service
at the Tomb of Abraham, [Goldstein] heard, along with many others,
the cries of Arabs in the mosque next door. 'Etback el Yahudkill
the Jews.' Many of Goldstein's friends feel that this pushed him
over the edge. The next morning he rose at dawn and went to the
mosque and killed those he thought were going to kill him."
Rabbi David Elizrie, Director of the National Conference
on Jewish and Contemporary Law, Yorba Linda, CA, in Los Angeles
Times, March 1, 1994
Fact: "[Goldstein] was not searched. Israeli army guards
did not ask why he was wearing his army doctor's uniform, although
he was widely known as one of the cave meshuggenah, or 'crazies'settlers
who had continuously harassed Arabs inside the tomb's mosque ...
Goldstein was a leading activist in Kach, the Jewish extremist group
whose symbol is a clenched fist and whose members believe Arabs
have to be expelled from Israel and the West Bank ... The Israeli
army had responsibility for keeping the peace. According to a military
source with direct personal experience, 'The army's main purpose
was to maintain the status quo and maintain this delicate balance
of rights. It's hard to understand how fanatic they can be about
centimeters.'
"For example, he said, a strip of the large hall, facing east
to Mecca, is reserved exclusively for Muslims. But when the militant
Jewish settlers come to pray on Friday night, they get rights to
another part of the large hall. The more militant Kach members often
take their chairs, he said, land push them right to the edge of
the carpet. And if one leg is actually on the carpet, it's a victory.
Each centimeter has gained them a lot. It comes down to centimeters
and minutes.'
"The Muslims complained constantly to the Israeli soldiers
about infractions. On Oct. 16, the Islamic Higher Council and the
Islamic Waqf, which oversee holy sites, sent a letter to Rabin complaining
that a settler identified as 'Baruch' attacked the muezzin, who
was calling Muslims to prayer, and 'poured flammable materials,
on the mosque carpet. According to the military source, the harassment
and retaliation was nonstop ... According to Yatom, the Israeli
commander, 'It was not something extraordinary or unusual to see
this doctor, who was well known by, the soldiers, wearing his military
reserve uniform and carrying his rifle."'
Correspondent David Hoffman, Washington Post, March
1, 1994
Are Israelis Morally Superior?
Myth: "The idea of 'extremists on both sides' leads
to that tired old sleightofhand known as moral equivalence,
as common: place by now as this year's snows. Equivalence is quantification,
and of a peculiarly dimwitted sort. Follow it and see where it takes
you ... How many Arab states are parliamentary democracies? How
many official Israelisponsored movements are dedicated to
the violent dismantling of any sovereign nation? Totting up, in
the name of equating the worst of 'both sides,' catapults us into
the absurd. "
Cynthia Ozick, New York Times, March 21 1994
Fact: "Israel may agree to international peacekeepers
in the territories, but the measures taken by the government on
Sundaythe arrest of five militant Jews and some sanctions
against settlersare totally insufficient because they are
too mild to convince Israelis that all kinds of racist and bloodthirsty
agitations will be banned and suppressed with an iron fist ... We
have long been familiar with Jews who incite violence. They are
the people who, unlike Islamic fundamentalist agitators, have not
been deported (nor will they be) or had their homes destroyed or
sealed up. But I see no difference between these Jews and Hamas
or Islamic Jihad: they do all that is within their power to prevent
the Israel-Arab war from being resolved through compromise; they
do all they can to turn it into a religious war between Judaism
and Islam, until the very last drop of blood has been shed.
"This murderer and the extremists behind him did exactly what
Hamas and Islamic Jihad hoped for. And Hamas and Islamic Jihad do
exactly what the Jewish zealots expect ... Politicians, from Prime
Minister Yitzhak Rabin to leaders of the country's right, expressed
all kinds of outrage and fury. Aharon Domb, a spokesman for the
settlers, while not praising the 'grave action,' said he was able
to understand the motives for it. Chief Rabbi Yisrael Lau, too,
renounced the 'shedding of blood' but evaded using the word ,murder'perhaps
because the murdered were not Jews.
"It is difficult to avoid asking ... a question that is neither
an IsraeliPalestinian one nor a dovishhawkish one, but
a question of morals between Jews and other Jews. Why were the chief
rabbi and other observant Jews content to use the word 'bloodshed'
instead of calling a murder a murder?"
Israeli author Amos Oz, New York Times, March 1, 1994
RHC |