April 1990, Page 21
The Intifada
Autopsies and Executions
By Mary Barrett
I came to Nablus to learn about the execution-style killing of
a young man here and the shooting death of his young friend.
I remembered another visit when the military had opened fire on
a demonstration. A teen-aged boy was shot in the face and soldiers
charged in to get him. Suddenly hundreds of people poured into the
street, oblivious to the teargas and live ammunition.
Old women ran straight at the soldiers, screaming and crying. Children
flooded around to protect them from flailing clubs and gun butts.
The wounded boy was dragged away by friends. Before the military
could seal the gates to the city, he was out.
The best efforts of a local hospital failed to save him, however.
As we entered, frenzied youths were plunging through the corridors
to a secret exit with their lifeless burden. Parents of other patients
rushed to hold doors and wipe the fresh blood from the tiled floor.
As hospital personnel rapidly swabbed down the surgery and changed
their smocks, a young woman rushed outside to drive away the car
which had brought the boy. By the time the army had maneuvered around
the barricades and plunged through the doors of the emergency room,
all was quiet.
Why did the soldiers want the body so badly and why were the Palestinians
ready to risk death to keep it? The stories of the families I had
come to see today embodied those issues. Nearly a month after their
sons had died, they had only just buried them.
A Family's Story
The home of 'Ammar Mohammad Anis Kalbouneh was decorated as so
many I had seen in the last two years. There were wreaths of palm,
bundles of flowers, calligraphed banners, photographs of the martyr
and, as always, colors of the Palestinian flag. During the 40 days
of mourning they would be replaced over and over after soldiers
entered and destroyed them.
'Ammar's mother sat in the living room with about 15 other women.
Pinned to her white scarf was a photograph of her 19-year old son
and his fiance, Bahiya Sayieh. There were no hysterics, no sobbing.
The women were calm, controlled and angry.
The story was a complex one. 'Ammar's mother, sisters and fiance
began by pointing out that they were mourning not only for 'Ammar,
but also for his friend Ayman Shafiq Jamous, killed at the same
time. The two had been living quietly for about a year in a deserted
house in the Rafidieh section of Nablus with three other youths,
all wanted by the army.
Nineteen-year-old 'Ammar Mohammad Anis Kaibouneh and his fiance,
Bahiya Sayieh.
At 4 a.m. on Sept. 2, 1989, the CID (Israeli secret police) and
Israeli soldiers surrounded the house and burst into it. Neighbors
heard a sustained explosion of gunfire, as if from a number of weapons.
Then terrible screams were heard from within. A young man was howling,
"Leave my head, God curse you, leave my head!" and someone
else was yelling, "You're going to answer, do you hear? You're
going to talk!" Suddenly the boy's screaming stopped. Neighbors
watched as Captain Kuby (some spell it Coby), an infamous Nablus
police officer, accompanied the motionless form of Ayman Jamous
from the house, still yelling at him, "You cannot die. I want
you alive."
At 9:30 in the morning the families heard of the deaths of 'Ammar
and Ayman on Israeli radio. They imagined their sons lying naked
on mortuary slabs with wounds over each kidney sewn closed with
coarse black thread, as so many families had described. Or perhaps
the boys were being maintained on life support, waiting, comatose,
to become unwitting organ donors.
When they demanded their sons' bodies, the military governor of
Nablus, Shemolik Mrad, claimed that they had been taken away and
buried in Rihaneh cemetery in Jericho. He gave the families a permit
to go to see the graves. Rihaneh is the place where martyred fellahiyeen,
the Palestinian fighters who have infiltrated from across the Jordan
River, are buried. Its location is secret. Rumors have long abounded
that those Palestinians who disappear after arrest end up there.
The grieving families of the two boys went to the military governor
of Jericho. At first he said he did not know what they were talking
about, and that they could not have been told the boys were buried
there because "Who is buried here is a military secret."
Finally, after they produced the permit he said yes, the bodies
were there but it was a closed military zone so they could not see
the graves.
The governor told the families they could not have the bodies,
"because you would not turn them over to us when they were
wanted." All of this only confirmed their initial suspicion.
They saw no reason to believe the boys' bodies were in Jericho.
On Sept. 8. Israeli lawyer Lea Tsemel, working with Palestinian
lawyer Adrian Abu Laileh, filed a plea in the Israeli High Court
demanding the bodies be exhumed, the families be permitted to examine
them, autopsies be performed with the families' choice of physician
in attendance, the families be permitted to bury them, and a thorough
investigation of the deaths be mounted.
Amid escalating violence, military governor Mrad called the Kalbouneh
and Jamous families to his office on Sept. 10. The bodies, he said,
were in fact at the Abu Kabir facility. Two members of each family
would go to identify them. The implicit assumption was that the
bodies had been there all along and Mrad said nothing to disabuse
the farmlies of this belief. (It was not until days later that they
were to learn the boys had been buried previously and exhumed.)
They demanded and received permission to be accompanied by a doctor.
On Sept. 11 and 12 the families, accompanied to Tel Aviv by Palestinian
surgeon Dr Jihad Aunallah, viewed the bodies from behind the glass
windows of the morgue at Abu Kabir facility at a distance of five
feet. Presuming the bodies to have been in the morgue since death,
Dr. Aunallah interpreted blistering and blackness to indicate the
boys had been burned rather than shot to death. Neither body was
recognizable. A number of tubes protruded from one. His mother recognized
his engagement ring. This was Ayman. The face and most of the head
of the other was gone. The word "Fateh" was tattooed in
English on his forearm, and an "A" on the back of his
thumb. His mother knew that this was 'Ammar.
The bodies identified. Mrad ordered mourning to begin, but the
families insisted they would not do so until their sons were properly
autopsied in the presence of a doctor of their choice (a provision
available to Israelis but not extended under the military law which
governs the occupied territories) and buried according to the tenets
of Islam. Horror at the thought that the boys might have been burned
to death set off a new wave of anger, with its concomitant deaths
and injuries. The autopsies took place on the 15th. The women of
the Kalbouneh family described them to me with remarkable sophistication
and apparent dispassion.
Midnight Burials
Five days after the autopsies, on Sept. 20, Mrad told the families
that the bodies would be brought from Abu Kabir at 10 p.m. for burial
in the local cemetery. He said the families would not he permitted
to prepare the bodies for burial and there would be no funeral.
Only three representatives from each family could be present. The
city was again placed under curfew. Several men went to dig the
graves.
In the evening. 'Ammar's mother, brothers and sisters, and his
fiance Bahiya, went to wait outside the graveyard. They found it
surrounded by soldiers. Mrad was at hand. But by 10 p.m. the bodies
had not come and the soldiers had chased the family away. They hid
in the dark at a nearby house. At midnight. as a military van entered
the graveyard, the women dashed after it and saw the black plastic
bags thrown onto the ground. Identification tags listed names and
numbers.
The men carried the bags to the grave sites under the watchful
eyes of soldiers. As the women approached, the soldiers turned and
began beating them back with their rifle butts. One of Ammar's relatives
tore open the polyethylene trash bag and turned the body in its
grave to face east towards Mecca. it was a small triumph in the
degrading process. From somewhere high in the Nablus hills a cry
rang out, "Allahu akbar." "God is great." Bahiya
translated. The rnartyrs had been laid to rest three weeks after
their deaths. Mourning could begin.
I went to see the renowned Palestinian physician, Dr. Hatem Abu
Ghazaleh. The right to perform autopsies is jealously held by the
Israeli authorities. Palestinian hospitals simply do not receive
the required permits. Consequently, few Palestinian doctors are
familiar with the procedures.
Dr. Abu Ghazaleh, however, was at one time the chief health official
for the West Bank under Jordanian administration. He had been director
of forensic medicine and autopsies, and often served as an expert
witness at criminal trials. A Nablus resident, he was the obvious
choice to assist at the autopsies. As we sipped coffee in his quiet
living room, he spoke at length about the legal ramifications of
the case and described the autopsies.
Abu Ghazaleh pointed Out that the bodies were returned to the Abu
Kabir facility before the High Court Could act on attorney Leah
Tsemel's plea in order to avoid the precedent of court-ordered exhumation.
The same held true for the autopsies and return of the bodies for
family burial, both of which were acceded to voluntarily by Mrad.
The postmortems were performed at the Abu Kabir Institute of Forensic
Medicine in Tel Aviv by its director, Dr. Yehuda Hiss. Before beginning,
Dr. Hiss explained to Dr. Abu Ghazaleh that the bodies had been
exhumed and returned to the Institute on Sept. 11, nine days after
the killings. The two doctors laid out the ground rules by which
they would work together, and proceeded with X-rays, photographs
and examinations.
The Autopsies
Dr. Hiss's observations and conclusions would be recorded by a
secretary in Hebrew. Abu Ghazaleh would not receive a copy of the
official autopsy report. (He did, however, issue his own report
in Arabic.) Closely following Israeli rules of procedure. the doctors
found that Ayman Jamous (identified as #1086-560/89) had died as
a result of a single high-velocity M-16 round fired on a downward
course through his chest and abdomen, severing the aorta, passing
through to the 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae and exiting next to
the anus. This extraordinary trajectory, they believe, resulted
from the victim having been shot while in a squatting position,
possibly as he was rising from an Arabic (floor level) toilet. A
concerted effort had been made to keep him alive, including the
insertion of a drainage tube in the chest wound, two fluid serum
lines in the arms, and a plastic line inserted into the chest believed
intended to aid in resuscitation. Bruises indicated the use of artificial
respiration. The patient. however, died some 15 to 20 minutes after
his injury. Medics apparently believed the bullet was lodged in
his chest and did not realize the aorta had been severed, causing
massive abdominal bleeding. In any case, he was not a candidate
for life support systems nor were any organs removed.
Dr. Abu Ghazaleh noted that the black color of the skin had washed
off, the superficial result of putrefaction. Internal examination
showed the intestines had not begun decomposition, not surprising
after only nine days in the ground. This was a very important point,
however, because when the doctors opened the skull, they discovered
that Ayman's brain had entirely liquefied: decomposition was complete.
Since the intestines are known to putrefy long before the brain,
the only explanation for this dramatic reversal of the normal case
was that his brain had been severely disrupted by being beaten on
the floor, causing it to begin dissolving almost immediately.
'Ammar Kalbouneh was identified as #1085/558/89. (When I photographed
his badly tarnished silver ring, returned before the autopsy by
Abu Kabir. it was in an envelope marked #1085/89, perhaps indicating
that the first number represents body count and the second, autopsy
count for the year.) His death was an entirely different story.
His corpse. too, was easily washed to show clear, white skin. The
face, forehead and jaw had entirely disappeared. Part of the skull
remained. Remarkably, although the bones had been separated. none
of the dentures (the interlocking edges) had broken. Dr. Ghazaleh
explained that this might have been caused by 'Ammar's head striking
the floor so violently that the skull simply exploded rather than
being crushed—probably the result of being hit by many bullets
simultaneously (dum dums as well as high velocity ammunition were
implicated). He had been shot in both arms and one leg. taken five
bullets in the chest, three in the back and two in the abdomen.
It was not obvious how his face had been cleared out. It was apparent
to both doctors that he had been assassinated. Clearly, he was never
a candidate for either organ transplant or transplant training.
Dr. Abu Ghazalch attributes the widespread anxiety over organ thefts
which has gripped Gaza and the West Bank since the intifada began
in December of 1987 to several factors. "There are indications
that for one reason or another, organs. especially eyes and kidneys,
were removed from the bodies during the first year or year and a
half'. There were just too many reports by credible people for there
to he nothing happening. If someone is shot in the head and comes
home in a plastic bag without internal organs, what will people
assume'? But I think that there was something happening inside of
Israel too. Outrage is not only a Palestinian experience.
"First there was the flurry of newspaper articles about successful
transplant teams and changing attitudes of Israelis towards transplants.
And then, when people asked who the donors were. the newspapers
talked about the great new sources of organs from Germany and South
America. It scared us to death. But I think it scared many Israelis.
too. There are now fewer incidents which point in that direction.
We hope it's simply becoming unacceptable."
The question of organ theft is of compelling concern to Palestinians.
Whether it is a matter of perception or fact. if not quickly addressed
its impact on future Israeli/Palestinian relations will be devastating.
Mary Barrett is a photo-journalist specializing in the Middle
East. She is based in Boston, MA. |