Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, April 1987, pages
15-16
Other People's Mail
"Gentlemen don't read other people's mail,"
an idealistic American leader exclaimed between World Wars I and
II as he abolished US cryptographic counter-intelligence programs.
Times change, however, and some letters by or to other people are
as informative for our readers as anything we might write ourselves
January 26, 1987
Ms. Sally Wells
Director, Member Services
WETA-Television 26—Radio FM91
Box 2600
Washington, DC 20013
Dear Ms. Wells,
In the spring of 1986, for the first time in many years, I did
not renew my membership. You have twice written asking why. Now
someone has telephoned. I did not want to complain about a disappointing
programming decision to a well-meaning volunteer. I promised, however,
to write.
Last April public television stations across the United States
were offered a special package of three films on Israel and the
Palestinians from the producers of PBS' own Flashpoint.
Two films looked at the problem from the Israeli perspective and
the third film, equal in length to the other two combined, from
the Palestinian perspective. To ensure complete balance, an Israeli
Likud (right-wing) Member of the Knesset, Ehud Olmert, and a Columbia
University Professor of Palestinian origin, Rashid Khalidi, were
invited to offer their comments. It seemed to be a carefully balanced
presentation.
However, the nation's two flagship PBS stations, WNET in New York
and WETA in Washington, chose not to show the program and, perhaps
as a result, 16 other PBS stations around the country followed your
example. Fortunately for those of us in the national capital, Howard
University's PBS station, WHMM, did show the program.
It is your right, of course, to decide what programs to accept
or reject. In this case, however, your decision seems to contradict
your responsibility as Washington DC's principal alternative to
commercial network television. Leading television news people have
been frank in describing why the commercial networks give the Palestinian
dispute relatively little coverage in comparison to comparable problems
in Central America, South Africa, Afghanistan, Iran or Lebanon.
Network executives, they explain, dislike negative news stories
about Israel. Since these feelings are reinforced by emotional audience
responses and strong advertiser pressures, it's a subject the commercial
networks touch gingerly, and infrequently.
All the more reason, therefore, for public television to step in
where commercial broadcasting falters. Instead, at WETA you faltered.
I once heard an Arab-American audience ask a Member of Congress
to explain why Congress raises aid to an increasingly intransigent
Israel at the same time it opposes weapons sales to increasingly
reasonable Arab allies like Jordan and Saudi Arabia. The Representative
responded that when Arab Americans begin giving as generously to
congressional election campaigns as American Jews, Congressmen will
begin voting according to their consciences.
I understand, therefore, what you would like to reply
to people like me who are deeply concerned with the denial of Palestinian
self-determination promised by the United Nations 40 years ago;
about the use of our tax money to export US weapons and even US
jobs to Israel; and about the blatant anti-Muslim bigotry and anti-Arab
racism pervading Hollywood and Israeli entertainment films now flooding
American television channels and theaters. Although you can't, you
would like to tell us that when we learn to give as generously,
and pointedly, as do your Jewish donors, you will have the courage
to accept rather than reject a balanced program about the Israeli-Palestinian
dispute.
Perhaps we do give as generously, but just not as pointedly. Let
me tell you first that the contribution you didn't receive in 1986
went to Station WHMM. Let me tell you also that I find it personally
repugnant to put strings on my donations to WETA, whose programs
I have enjoyed so much. But it's clear to me now that there have
been strings on the programming you have provided. When I see from
your programming that you've cut yourself free, I'll loosen my purse
strings. I'm ready whenever you are.
Sincerely,
Donna Bourne
Chevy Chase, MD |