March 1993, Page 65
Christianity and the Middle East
Israeli Group Seeks to Eliminate Inter-Religious
Bias and Bigotry
By the Reverend L. Humphrey Walz
It is a tragic fact that religion has been the catalyst for some
of history's grossest perversions. General Secretary Jonathan Tsevi
of the Association for the Promotion of Inter-Religious Education
in Israel (P.O. Box 7972, Jerusalem 91079), cites a few of the far
too numerous examples: the ancient Israelite invasion of Canaan,
the Christian Crusades, the 1492 Spanish deportation of Jews, the
Shi'i Muslim Hezbollah's suicide truck-bombing of the U.S. Marine
barracks in Beirut, and the widespread bloodshed throughout India
in the wake of the destruction of the Badri Mosque in Ayodhya, India.
"Most people today are yearning for a world of peace and harmony
between peoples, nations and religions," a report by the association
declares. "The vast majority of world religions proclaim their
desire" for such a world.
Tsevi attributes the perversion of such good intentions into the
intellectual undergirding for pogroms and persecutions in part on
believers. The convictions of many about the unique merits of their
faith lead them to conclude that it makes them "special"
and "superior" to others whom they are free to denigrate
and permitted, sometimes encouraged, to repress or eliminate.
Another factor in religion-inspired conflict is the skill of self-serving
manipulators who are able to take loyalty to institutions, creeds,
traditions, scriptures, structures, symbols or relationships, and
redirect that loyalty to serve their own purposes.
Such misuse of religion, mixed with ignorance, misinformation and
disinformation, Tsevi sees as elements in the escalation of Israeli-Palestinian
violence, and the spread of its divisiveness to other lands and
to succeeding generations.
"When children grow up into that atmosphere of misconception
and distortion," Tsevi explains, "the vicious circle is
ever accelerating."
As they began action to counter misinformation at their own Jewish-Israeli
doorstep, the association's leaders quickly discovered that all
that many educated Jews "knew" about Christianity were
three misconceptions: (1) Christians deliberately distort Hebrew
scriptures; (2) Christians blame Jews for the execution of Jesus;
and (3) Christians hate Jews in ways that can only lead to more
persecution. Jews who harbor these ideas would not be likely to
read books on the subject or attend university night classes, the
association concluded, but they might be willing to learn about
Christians by meeting some and candidly discussing their faith and
outlook on their own ground.
An "Overwhelming" Response
"To our great joy," says Tsevi, the response of both
Palestinian and resident alien Christians "was overwhelming."
The association chose January 1990 to launch a program involving
one weekend a month for five months in which Israeli Jews would
seek "understanding, tolerance and even appreciation"
by visiting a variety of Christians, mostly in the Galilee and in
Jerusalem.
From Christian pastors, educators and laymen, and from Jews well
acquainted with them, the participants would hear about and discuss
the life and teachings of Jesus and the historical separation of
early Christianity from the various Jewish philosophical currents
of the time. They would hear directly from a Danish nun, Dr. Kristen
Federsen, and from Bruno Husara convert from Judaism who became
a Dominican brother and established the Jewish-Arab rural community
of Beit Shalomwhy they joined holy orders.
The Jewish participants would spend a night in the Scotch Presbyterian
pilgrim hostel, formerly a hospital; tour desert monastic ruins
with an archaeologist; and visit an active monastery and a convent,
as well as Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox parishes. They also
would participate passively in Christian rituals, including the
Good Friday Way of the Cross procession along Jerusalem's Via Dolorosa.
Such experiences, plus discussion of the Bible, sin, atonement
and redemption, and a lecture by Gdalia Stroumsa, head of comparative
religion studies at Hebrew University, led many who participated
to conclude that their understanding of their own religion had been
enhanced by viewing it along with Christianity.
There were also contacts with "offbeat" expressions of
Christianity. These included a meeting with Hebrew Christians, also
known as Messianic Jews. They retain their full Jewish self-identity,
but have been officially disenfranchised by the Israeli government
for their belief that Jesus was the Messiah foretold by the ancient
Hebrew prophets. The group also visited the European- and American-financed
"Christian Embassy." The latter has established itself
in "Jerusalem, D.C." ("David's Capital") in
expectation of Jesus' return after 144,000 Jews have been converted
and the Muslim Dome of the Rock has been replaced by a "Third
Jewish Temple." At that time, according to "Christian
Embassy" adherents, unbelievers, Jewish and Gentile, will perish
in agony. (This is treated as tactfully as possible in the "Christian
Embassy's" abundantly available literature.)
Favorable reactions of both leaders and learners to the 1990 experience
and subsequent similar programs have been vigorously asserted. Professor
Stroumsa reflected the views of many when she said it was "high
time the inter-religious dialogue descended from the ivory tower
to the common people."
The Gulf war cut the 1991 series to three sessions, but the original
number has been restored. Prerequisite reading remains the same:
the Gospel of Matthew, Mark or Luke, and Prof. David Flusser's simplified
version of his book on Jewish sources of Christianity. The association
has sought and achieved greater participation by teachers, administrators,
media staff, community leaders and others "with a capacity
to influence deeds and decisions."
The appeal of the program is evident from the fact that the quota
of 36 participants has regularly been filled even before public
announcements have been made, and 76 percent of those who have taken
the course want more. The organizers are particularly pleased that
78 percent would like to enroll in a similar venture in Jewish-Muslim
relations. Such undertakings now are stymied by the current violence
in the Holy Land, but will be resumed when political conditions
permit. |