Washington Report, March 19, 1984, Page 6
Facts For Your Files: A Chronology of U.S. Middle East
Relations
February 29:
The Pentagon informed Congress that it planned to sell Saudi Arabia
1,200 Stinger antiaircraft missiles costing an estimated $141 million.
If the sale is not blocked by Congress—whose power to do so
is in doubt since the Supreme Court ruled last year that it does
not have the authority to veto arms sales—Saudi Arabia will
become the first Arab nation to receive the U.S. weapons.
March 1:
The Pentagon notified Congress of its plans to sell Jordan 1,613
Stinger missiles at a total cost of approximately $133 million.
The proposed sale which includes spare parts and support equipment
is separate from the Administration's plan, not yet submitted to
Congress, to spend an additional sum of about $200 million equipping
two Jordanian brigades with transport planes, trucks, ammunition
and other supplies for possible use in regional emergencies.
March 5:
In the wake of reports that Iraq had used chemical weapons in its
war against Iran, State Department spokesman John Hughes said: "The
United States has concluded that the available evidence indicates
that Iraq has used lethal chemical weapons" and that the U.S.
"strongly condemns" this. He went on to criticize Iran,
by saying the Administration believed its "intransigent refusal
to deviate from its avowed objective of eliminating the legitimate
government of neighboring Iraq to be inconsistent with the accepted
norms of behavior among nations."
March 5:
State Department spokesman John Hughes said the U.S. "regrets"
the Lebanese cabinet's decision made earlier in the day to formally
abrogate the May 17 agreement with Israel, which provided for the
withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon. "That proposed agreement,"
Mr. Hughes said, "still represents the only agreed formula
for ensuring both Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon and Israel's
legitimate security interests in a manner consistent with Lebanese
sovereignty." He added that the U.S. "does not intend
to abandon the people or the legitimate government of Lebanon,"
and that decisions regarding additional military and economic aid
would be made "as the situation unfolds."
March 5:
Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir's office said in a statement
that Lebanon's abrogation of the May 17 agreement amounted to "a
death sentence for Lebanese independence and sovereignty."
The statement added that because "Lebanon is incapable of fulfilling
her international obligations and of preventing south Lebanon once
again from being turned into a terrorist base, Israel itself will
determine the best ways to ensure its security."
March 12:
State Department spokesman John Hughes denied charges by Ethiopia
that the U.S. was "airlifting" new weapons to Sudan to
help it thwart rebel attacks in the southern part of the country.
Mr. Hughes said the U.S. and Sudan "are reviewing the ongoing
military assistance program," but that "no decision has
been taken yet as to the type of military equipment nor the mode
of delivery."
March 15:
Responding to King Hussein's publicly announced refusal to negotiate
for Mideast peace on the basis of President Reagan's Sept. 1, 1982,
initiative which, the King said, had been "destroyed,"
along with U.S. "credibility" State Department spokesman
John Hughes said: "There is not a very attractive alternative
to negotiation. The only alternative to negotiations in the Middle
East is sliding back down that slippery road toward war." Mr.
Hughes added: "I don't want to analyze Jordanian motivations,
but (if) you're asking me is it a fact that a great deal of Soviet
weaponry has been moved into Syria, and must Jordan be concerned
by that, I presume the answer would be yes." King Hussein made
his remarks in an interview with The New York Times on March 14.
(See excerpts below.)
SIDEBAR
Reagan and Hussein differ over Sept. 1, 1982 "Reagan Plan"
Following are excerpts from a speech by President Reagan on
March 13 to the United Jewish Appeal:
I am convinced that the initiative I presented on Sept. 1, 1982,
remains the best option for all the parties ... It is time for the
Arab world to negotiate directly with Israel and to recognize Israel's
right to exist...
If there is to be any hope for those negotiations, however, we
must preserve our credibility as a fair minded broker seeking a
comprehensive solution. Only the United States can advance this
process. We must not undermine our role...
We must help to protect moderate Arabs who seek peace from the
radical pressures that have done such harm in Lebanon ... One such
friend, whom we continue to urge to negotiate with Israel, is King
Hussein of Jordan.
Today, Jordan is crucial to the peace process. For that very reason,
Jordan, like Israel, is confronted by Syria and faces military threats
and terrorist attacks. Since the security of Jordan is crucial to
the security of the entire region, it is in America's strategic
interest and I believe it is in Israel's strategic interest for
us to help meet Jordan's legitimate needs for defense against the
growing power of Syria and Iran...
Following are excerpts from a New York Times interview
with Jordan's King Hussein on March 14:
The President's initiative of Sept. 1 was destroyed, as was U.S.
credibility, by Israel's rejection of it. This was followed by Israel's
settlement activity, which was intensified and which was a direct
answer to the President's initiative...
The U.S. looks at us and speaks of direct negotiations being the
only way out, while we don't know what the U.S. position is.
We see things in the following way: Israel is on our land. It is
there by virtue of American military and economic aid that translates
into aid for Israeli settlements. Israel is there by virtue of American
moral and political support to the point where the United States
is succumbing to Israeli dictates.
It's obvious that this being the case, there is no way by which
anyone should imagine it would be possible for Arabs to sit and
talk with Israel as long as things are as they are ... We were ready
to try to work with the Reagan plan ... But I can't see anything
happening except further deterioration of the situation. |