Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2000, Page
51
Commentary
The Sabres of Paradise
By Mowahid H. Shah
Forty years ago, Lesley Blanch wrote The Sabres of Paradise,
an epic account of Tsarist Russia’s attempt to subdue Dagestan in
the 1800s. Echoes of that have reverberated with the continuing
conflict in Chechnya and Dagestan with Muslims of the Caucasus.
The Caucasus has remained the Wild West for the Russians. The Caucasus
was once considered an Indo-European hub—hence the word “Caucasian,”
by which whites like to designate themselves. The Muslims of the
Caucasus are a handsome, daring people who do not shirk from a fight.
Lesley Blanch wrote about Imam Shamil’s epic stand against the
Russians for nearly 25 years in the Caucasian War (1816-1856). Under
Shamil’s charismatic leadership, the Caucasians resisted the Russians
in a bloody, heroic war, which cost the lives of hundreds of thousands
of Russian troops. The memory of this is seared into the Russian
psyche. Russian poets and literati like Pushkin and Tolstoy wrote
about it. Tolstoy penned a novel, Hadji Murad, on the legendary
exploits of a red-haired Muslim mujahid. It was turned into
a movie under the same name starring ex-Mr. Universe Steve Reeves.
This was before the wave of Islamophobia.
The region’s famous warrior-hero continues to inspire. According
to a Los Angeles Times writer, the red flag and the bearded
image of Lenin, which not many years ago used to dominate every
public building in the Caucasus, were replaced with Islamic green
flags and banners in honor of Imam Shamil.
The Russians have not learned the lessons of their 19th century
Caucasus misadventures. To rephrase what Napoleon once said about
the Bourbons of France: “The Russians learned nothing, forgot nothing.”
While Chechnya is being pummeled, remember it was the Russians
who were screaming the loudest over the NATO air campaigns against
their Orthodox co-religionists—the Serbs. The latest onslaught—the
work of Russian PM and former KGB man Vladimir Putin—is clearly
an attempt to erase the humiliation of the debacle in Chechnya in
1996 (which scholar Anatol Lieven called the “tombstone of Russian
power”) and the earlier defeat in Afghanistan.
Hungarian freedom fighter Bela, in a letter to The New York
Times of Oct. 27,1999 on Chechnya, wrote: “I am ashamed of “the
deafening silence coming from the United Nations and Washington.”
To this he could have added the OIC in Jeddah. In a recent speech,
Kofi Annan waxed eloquent that, from now on, humanitarian compulsions
can pierce the veil of national territorial sovereignty. But did
he walk the talk?
In the past 200 years, the Muslims of the Caucasus have shown indomitable
fighting spirit against Moscow’s animus toward Muslims. Stalin imposed
Russia’s Cyrillic script on all Central Asian republics while allowing
his own (non-Muslim) Georgian people to retain their own. Muslims
who have resisted Russian suzerainty have been called “basmachi”
(bandits). But, in the case of Chechnya, the real banditry has come
from the Kremlin.
Mowahid H. Shah practices law in Washington, DC. This article
first appeared in the Nov. 5 Pakistan Link, published in Los Angeles.
Reprinted with permission. |