wrmea.com

February/March 1996, Pages 18, 117-118

From the Hebrew Press

Translations From Israeli Hebrew-Language Newspapers

By Israel Shahak

President Clinton's New Promise to Likud

Ma'ariv, Nov. 8, 1995. By Menahem Rahat.

The president of the U.S., Bill Clinton, told the leaders of Likud yesterday that the U.S. would give the same support to Israel if Likud should come  into power, and conduct the peace process on its own terms, as it now gives  to the Labor government. This was announced by the former Israeli ambassador  to the U.S., Zalman Shoval, who is now in charge of Likud's relations with  the leaders of foreign states, after he and other Likud leaders emerged  from an intimate meeting with the president. The other participants were  Benyamin Netanyahu, Moshe Katzav, Benyamin Begin and Dan Meridor.

Clinton's key sentence in that meeting was, "Although the United  States will always help Israel to advance toward peace, the U.S. will never  tell Israel how to do it." This statement satisfied Likud's leaders.

A Link in the Irangate Conspiracy

Ha'aretz, Oct. 27, 1995. By Amir Oren.

The old joke about a policeman dispersing a communist demonstration  and incidentally clubbing a man who is an anti-communist while telling  him he doesn't care what kind of communist the man is, has recently come  to life in the Israeli "Intelligence and Special Tasks Agency"  (better known as Mossad). Khomeinist or anti-Khomeinist, Mossad or anti-Mossad,  someone at the top does not care.

Ya'akov Nimrodi rubbed shoulders with Mossad for many years. While he  was Israeli military attaché in Iran, Colonel Nimrodi had frequent  confrontations with Mossad. Later, when he became an arms dealer, Nimrodi  also became an expert at combining that which was pleasant for him with  that which was useful to him. When he participated in the effort to topple  the Iranian government, or at least to strengthen the moderate elements  within it, everything was connected, one way or another, with sales of  military equipment which were lucrative for him.

In 1983 it appeared that Iran was near a victory over Iraq. According  to foreign publications, Nimrodi and his partners, including Al Schwemer,  one of the founders of Israeli Aeronautical Industries, then tried to convince  the security elements in the Israeli government and in the U.S. administration  to arm an Iranian army in exile under the leadership of Prince Reza, son  of the late shah. The plan was to equip those Iranians and to train them  in camps in Sudan with the consent of its ruler Ja'afar Numeiri. The arms  for them would be transferred by a three-way transaction involving American,  Israeli and royalist Iranians which would line the pockets of the go-betweens  and possibly also those of the Israeli government. Defense Minister Moshe  Arens and his ministry's officials supported the plan, but senior Mossad  officials, whose assistance was requested, doubted its wisdom and frustrated  it even though they were commanded to expedite it.

Mossad officials were astounded when they learned the identity of the  intermediary.

Two years later, when the idea that led to the entanglement in the Irangate  affair was revealed, Mossad officials were astounded when they learned  about the identity of the Iranian intermediary, N. Gorbanifar, and discovered  that Nimrodi had discussed the idea with the general director of the foreign  ministry, David Kimchi, a former Mossad agent and a rival of its head at  the time, and that these figures had convinced the then prime minister,  Shimon Peres, to remove Mossad from involvement in the affair. Their explanation  was that such involvement would sabotage the renewed arms sales plan, made  possible by their discovery of a Khomeinist, Gorbanifar, who was eager  to hold negotiations with Israel.

Whether because Mossad chiefs have been busy for the past six or seven  years with other operations, or whether because Mossad prefers to recall  Nimrodi's past favors ("at a certain stage he served Mossad and at  other times he helped us"), the head of the Mossad recently decided  to add Nimrodi to the membership of the Association of Mossad Veterans  as an honorary retiree. Several important former Mossad agents are indeed  friends of Nimrodi (or of his employees) but other veterans whom he does  not employ reacted with anger and felt insulted. Now they are wondering  who will be nominated next as an honorary retiree; perhaps Mossad defector  and author Victor Ostrovsky.

Note Concerning John Deutch, U.S. CIA Director

Ma'ariv, Oct. 22, 1995. By Adah Cohen.

The director of the CIA, John Deutch, who visited Israel last weekend  to meet Prime Minister Rabin, used the opportunity to visit his family.  Many members of his family, including his aunt, live in Israel. His aunt  had invited Deutch to a dinner in which his many relatives who live in  Israel participated.* The U.S. Embassy in Israel made efforts to hide this  event, but in spite of them, it became known when American security agents  came to the aunt's house just before Deutch's dinner and made a thorough  security check in the entire flat. This is done in every place visited  by the head of the CIA.

*When Deutch was nominated by Clinton to his position, the Hebrew press  expressed great satisfaction that Deutch and his deputy David Cohen were  both Jewish.

Israeli Military Strategy in Turkey

Ha'aretz, Sept. 27, 1995. By Ze'ev Shiff.

The deal between Israel and Turkey for the overhaul of Turkey's Phantom  warplanes to the tune of about $600 million is the biggest yet defense  project that Israel has had with a Muslim state. It should not be regarded  as a mere economic transaction, but as a major development in the strategic  cooperation of Israel with an important state in the Middle East. The deal  is only the tip of an iceberg of extensive military cooperation. American  defense industries may feel hurt as a result of this deal, but it may be  assumed that the White House and the State Department view Israeli-Turkish  cooperation and the project positively because of its broad strategic value.

Three neighbors are problematic from the Turkish point of view—Iraq,  Iran, and Syria. These are states also hostile to Israel. The Turkish government  surely wants to convey the signal that, in the regional balance of forces,  it has a strong and stable friend like Israel. Both seek stability in the  region and conform with U.S. interest in such stability. Turkey also wants  to carry out a modernization of its army and Israel can assist in this  endeavor.

One should keep in mind the struggle of both Israel and Turkey against  terrorism and Turkey's growing fear of an increase of extremist Islamic  terror. Here, too, there is room for cooperation, although Israel does  not want to be dragged into the bloody struggle with the Kurdish underground  which finds shelter in Syria, as the Turkish intelligence knows. Turkey  is an important member of NATO and its army is the second largest in the  alliance. However, much of the Turkish military equipment is outdated and  requires replacement.

The modernization will cost Turkey some $10 billion in the next several  years while Turkey is burdened with bad economic conditions and a large  foreign debt. The debt burden has grown because of the loss of revenues  from the flow of Iraqi oil through the Turkish pipeline.

It is in Israel's interest to extend relations with Turkey. First the  level of diplomatic relations was raised, then a military attaché  was sent and a document of understanding was signed defining defense relations  between the two states. The military security dialogue continues and this  week the director of the Defense Ministry, David Ivri, returned from Turkey.  One example of the closer diplomatic relationship is the air-fueling maneuver  that was carried out in May 1994 when Turkish planes were refueled by an  Israeli plane.

The negotiations on the Phantom agreement continued for a long time.  The Turkish air force has six squadrons with 165 Phantom planes. Israel  has experience in renovating and transforming this plane into the Kurnas  2000. The overhaul prolongs the operational life of the Phantom by 15 to  20 years. A modern American radar and an advanced computerized aeronautical  system were introduced into the Phantom, including an improved electronic  combat and navigation system. The capability of the plane to participate  in a ground battle has also been improved. U.S. and German companies also  competed for the deal in Turkey. In the beginning, Israel took part in  the bid of the American radar producer Norden, whose system is installed  in the new Israeli Phantoms. But this bid failed. Norden asked for $5 million  for each radar system. So as not to lose the deal, Israel, through the  Elta Company, proposed to produce a similar radar for only about $3 million  and won the bid. Elta has now to prove to the Turks that the performance  of its radar is adequate. In August an agreement was signed that included  a technical and financial framework for the overhaul of 54 Phantoms, 30  of them to be overhauled in Israel.

As expected, the success of Israeli Aircraft Industries (IAI) angered  Norden and other U.S. companies. Norden has accused Israel and Turkey of  unfair practices in testimony before the U.S. Congress. The main accusation  is against IAI, a former partner of Norden, blamed for giving Turkey misleading  information. Norden will ask the U.S. administration to take steps for  cancellation of the deal with Israel. Probably Norden will be prepared  now to offer lower prices and will turn to circles in Turkey who oppose  making any contacts with Israel.

For our part, the problem of the Turkish deal is financial. The Turks  demand that payments begin only after two years in the five-year deal.  Thus, interim financing is needed by IAI, putting heavy pressure on the  company. It owes the banks about $300 million. An ugly struggle has been  going on between the company and the banks about this debt. It is little  wonder that the banks do not want to finance the deal with Turkey and they  are not interested in the strategic importance of the deal.

The finances thus become a matter for the finance minister and the prime  minister to act upon. The finance minister has already committed himself  to not allow the Phantoms deal to be lost. What also bothers him is how  to make sure that, on Jan. 1, 1997, when the IAI wage agreements expire,  the company does not collapse financially.

The Cabalists Who Cursed Rabin: "Our Prayer Has Been Answered"

Ma'ariv, Nov. 6, 1995. By Shlomo Tzetzna.

A group of 10 Cabalists, who had held a prayer for Rabin's death on  the last Yom Kippur Eve, said yesterday that their prayer had been answered.1 Avigdor Askin, an extreme religious activist who organized the prayer for  Rabin's death, said that "Rabin's assassination is the materialization  of a special prayer formulated long ago by the Cabbalists. We now pray  that Yitzhak Rabin will be the last victim of peace." When Rabin was  rushed to the hospital, Askin announced on Israeli radio that Cabalistic  prayers were being held to speed his death.

The special prayer referred to is a curse supposed to cause a person  to die. This prayer has been only rarely offered in Israel. According to  Cabala tradition, after saying the prayer, the person must die. If the  person for whom the prayer was said does not die, one of the 10 people  conducting the prayer will die.2 Askin: "We are not happy,  since we adhere to the verse: 'do not rejoice at the fall of your enemy.'  However, we are not sad, because the Bible enjoins us to sing and rejoice  when evil persons die."

1The reference is to a Cabalistic prayer called in Aramaic  "Whip of Fire" (Pulsa D'nura) which is supposed to kill. Ten  Cabalists assemble before midnight at a place (either a synagogue or a  cave) lit only by black candles and recite the secret names of angels,  special prayers and curses. Exactly at midnight the candles are extinguished  and a ram's horn is blown by the 10 participants. Actually, this is only  the mildest Cabalistic curse. There are stronger curses than the "Whip  of Fire," for example one in which a white cockerel is offered to  Satan and his blood then poured on the victim's door, but they need greater  experts. It should be added that some religious Jews who do believe in  Cabala have indeed, in the last few decades, died or have had heart attacks  when told that the "Whip of Fire" was performed against them.

2It was said twice, in January 1991, against Saddam Hussain.  When he did not die, the Cabalists said that they made a mistake in the  ritual. I have no idea if one of the Cabalists subsequently died.

Trying to Understand Peres

Ma'ariv , Oct. 25, 1995. By Shalom Yershalmi.

Yehuda Harel and Hayim Guri, two of the founders of the Third Way movement,  always say that Shimon Peres is the only real supporter of Greater Israel  in the present government. He did not want to partition the Land of Israel  lengthwise and was not enthusiastic about separation between Israelis and  Palestinians. Peres, who already in the 1970s established the settlements  Ofra and Sebastia [now called Kedumim], was always opposed, according to  those two, to dismantling any of the settlements. Moreover, Peres mocks  the Likud hawk M.K. Tsahi Ha'negbi and his friends who were evacuated by  Genin from Yamit in 1982 and claims that he would not allow himself to  be so evacuated. He dreams about the industrial parks on the frontier between  Israel and the Palestinian entity where Palestinians will be employed,  but apparently under Israeli ownership of these parks. Anyone who listened  to Peres' speech at the opening of the Knesset's winter session, and anyone  who has heard his statements in various closed forums, understands better  what Harel and Guri are saying. Peres would like to stabilize the map of  the interim settlements, hoping that this will be the permanent map of  Israel and the Palestinian entity: Neither separation, nor annexation.  To swallow the Palestinians, but not to eat them. That is why Peres is  so enthusiastic about the Oslo II accords which gave the Palestinians control  of only about 27 percent of the West Bank, and left Israel with authority  over Palestinian security and foreign affairs. Perhaps that is also the  reason he rubbed his hands with glee after the accord was signed and said  in private conversation at the home of the Chinese ambassador, "We  screwed the Palestinians."

Indeed, Peres conducted the lengthy negotiations at Taba mainly about  the authority to be transferred to the Palestinians, and said hardly anything  about the borders. Peres believes, or wants to believe, that the 140,000  Jewish settlers will remain in the territories in perpetuity and that no  Jewish settlement will ever be evacuated.

"Eight hundred thousand Arab citizens live in Israel and there  is a respectable and nonviolent arrangement between us and them. There  is no reason why the same relations that exist in Israel should not exist  there," said Peres in the Knesset, borne on the wings of imagination  about his new Middle East. Unusually, this time the foreign minister did  not mention the town Ma'alot-Tarshikha of Israel where Arabs and Jews live  in harmony.

Peres did not stress that the Arabs who live in Israel recognize the  Israeli government and agree to live under its sovereignty. They participate  in the elections and are elected to the Knesset. In contrast, the tens  of thousands of Jews who live in the territories, among the Palestinian  population, do not recognize the Palestinian entity and to not want to  accept its laws or to be elected to its governing bodies. They have extreme  views and contain violent elements who do not believe in any reasonable  arrangement with the Palestinians, and pray for the day when the Oslo I  and II accords would fall apart and Yasser Arafat would be brought to trial  in an Israeli court and sentenced to death. Peres can receive accurate  details about all this from right-wing extremists such as Geula Cohen.

Will the Palestinians agree to co-existence under conditions proposed  by Peres? No. Even Arafat, who tolerates, although he does not like, the  separation and the closure, and constantly complains about them, regards  the Jewish settlements located deep in the Palestinian territory as an  unendurable Israeli taunt. In the course of the next several years, the  conflict over Jerusalem and over the settlements will be inevitably renewed.  The extreme and murderous elements in the Palestinian society who oppose  any peace will use the settlement issue to destroy what was agreed upon.  Is Peres unaware of this complexity? Is he smarter than the rest of us?  Does he know, in fact, that there is no possibility of combining two populations  under such difficult conditions? Does he only want to calm the settlers  who do not believe him? Was his speech in the Knesset only an obfuscation?  Another of his typical episodes of saying yes and no at the same time?  Anyone who has not yet despaired is invited to re-examine the twists and  turns of the foreign minister's tortuous thinking. I am a bit desperate.

All of the previous translations are taken from the December 1995  issue of From the Hebrew Press (see ad on p. 117).

Dr.  Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor and retired professor of chemistry  at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, is chairman of the Israeli League  of Human and Civil Rights.