February 1989, Page 38
Lobbies and Activists
Focus on Jews and Israel
By Andrea Barron
American Jews React to US-P.L.O. Dialogue
American-Jewish leaders reacted far more positively than their
Israeli counterparts to Secretary of State George Shultz's decision
to open a dialogue with the PLO. Both Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak
Shamir and Labor party Leader Shimon Peres criticized the decision
and reiterated that Israel will not negotiate with the PLO under
any conditions. Morris Abram, chairman of the Conference of Presidents
of Major American Jewish Organizations, refrained from criticizing
Shultz, while some US Jewish leaders almost appeared to welcome
the Shultz announcement.
George Gruen, director of Middle East affairs at the American Jewish
Committee, termed the dialogue "a necessary first step toward
seeing whether the PLO are suitable partners in the peace process."
And the American Jewish Congress commented, "the United States
responded correctly to (PLO Chairman Yasser) Arafat's statements
in Geneva on Dec. 14 by opening a dialogue with the PLO."
But mainstream Jewish organizations also called on the PLO to match
its words with deeds. Morris Abram said the first thing the US ought
to do when it begins talks with the PLO is to demand that the organization
amend its covenant, which calls for the dismantlement of the state
of Israel. The AJ Congress said that besides revoking its charter,
the PLO should also support the repeal of the UN Zionism-is-racism
resolution and stop trying to expel Israel from the world body.
According to the AJ Committee, if the PLO wants peace, it should
end the year-old Palestinian uprising in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip.
Jerusalem Post correspondent Charles Hoffman says the fact
that the US is treating a "former terrorist" like Yasser
Arafat as "respectable" could seriously affect relations
between Israel and the American-Jewish community. However, Hoffman
said, Israel should not expect US Jews to brand American politicians
who support a Palestinian state "anti-Israel" if these
politicians still favor large amounts of aid to the Jewish state.
Tikkun Announces Campaign for "Negotiations Now"
Over 1,500 Jewish progressives and intellectuals gathered together
in New York City in December for a conference sponsored by the two-year
old liberal Jewish magazine Tikkun, based in Oakland, CA.
(Tikkun, pronounced tih-KOON, means to "repair the world"
in Hebrew.) Tikkun editor Michael Lerner accused the major
Jewish organizations of being more conservative than the vast majority
of American Jews, and of being too uncritical of Israel's policies
toward the Palestinians. He attributed this to the disproportionate
influence "the 29 percent of Jews who voted for George Bush"
wield in these organizations.
"Sixty percent of American Jews supported Secretary of State
Shultz's peace plan calling for an international conference based
on the exchange of land for peace," Lerner said. "But
when Shamir came to the United States last March to reject the Shultz
proposal, the press reported that the American-Jewish community
gave him the support he was seeking." Lerner and other speakers
argued that it was time for liberal Jews to make their voices heard
on domestic and foreign policy issues, especially on Israel.
Lerner said Tikkun intends to launch a campaign for "Negotiations
Now" between Israel and the PLO, and that American Jews should
help convince Israel such negotiations would be in its best interests.
He also declared his support for a demilitarized Palestinian state
in the West Bank and Gaza and for continued US military aid to Israel
to "protect it from assault by those surrounding Arab states
that remain unwilling to make peace."
Besides Lerner, featured speakers at the Tikkun conference
included Henry Siegman, executive director of the American Jewish
Congress, Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank; Palestinian intellectuals
Edward Said and Ibrahim Abu-Lughod; and former Israeli Ambassador
Abba Eban. Eban called the U.S. decision to begin talks with the
PLO "a spasm of lucidity" and said the West Bank and Gaza
should be under Arab not Israeli control. Asked if he would accept
Palestinian rather than Jordanian sovereignty over the territories,
Eban answered "Yes," adding, "the key is that these
areas be demilitarized."
Staff Change May Push AIPAC Further Right
The departure of Douglas Bloomfield, chief lobbyist for the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) for the last nine years,
may push the powerful lobby further to the right under the Bush
administration. Larry Cohler reported in the Washington Jewish
Week that Bloomfield was forced to leave because of a conflict
with Steve Rosen, AIPAC's foreign policy and research director,
and with some Republican board members. Bloomfield, a Democrat,
concentrated on establishing strong relationships with both Democrats
and Republicans on Capitol Hill. Rosen, a conservative Republican,
"cultivated right-wing figures" like Jesse Helms and has
focused more on lobbying the Republican administration.
Rosen waged a three-year campaign to force the closure of the PLO
observer mission to the United Nations, an effort which proved unsuccessful.
He also was the force behind AIPAC's effort to prevent Yasser Arafat
from addressing the UN last November. One of Bloomfield's top priorities
was to prevent US arms sales to Arab countries. Rosen, by contrast,
did not want AIPAC to come out too strongly against the arms sales
so the lobby could stay on the "good side" of the administration.
AIPAC officials have denied that the departure of Bloomfield will
weaken the organization or influence its ideological bent. But others,
including former AIPAC executive director Morris Amitay, disagree.
"I'd say (this) means that AIPAC's effectiveness on the Hill
will be diminished," Amitay told the Jewish Week. Said
a former AIPAC staffer who now works on Capitol Hill, "When
Doug walks out of AIPAC, their effectiveness on the Hill drops by
50 percent."
Jewish Groups "Adopt" Yesh Gvul Refuseniks
Jewish groups throughout the US are adopting Israeli prisoners
of conscience as part of a campaign to support Yesh Gvul ("There
is a Limit") the organization of Israeli soldiers and reservists
refusing to serve in the West Bank, Gaza, or Lebanon. According
to Marc Margolis, spokesperson for the San Francisco-based "Friends
of Yesh Gvul," groups in Washington, Baltimore, Miami, and
Santa Cruz have already "adopted" men who have gone to
jail for their beliefs.
The Jewish Committee for Israeli-Palestinian Peace (JCIPP) in Washington
has adopted David Palma, the 50th Israeli imprisoned since the start
of the Palestinian uprising. Palma, the son of holocaust survivors,
is a 39-year-old journalist who has already served three prison
terms. JCIPP is committed to raising $450 for Palma to replace the
government stipend he would have received had he done his tour of
duty in the territories. Ellen Siegel from JCIPP says, "Mainstream
Israelis—sons of holocaust survivors—are refusing to
serve in the occupied territories. We want Israel to know that there
are Jews in America behind them, that these men are not isolated."
You can help JCIPP's Yesh Gvul campaign by sending a donation to
JCIPP, PO Box 4991, Washington, DC, 20008. All checks should be
made out to the Resource Center for Non-Violence. Individuals or
groups interested in adopting a Yesh Gvul refusenik should write
to Marc Margolis at 808 Post St., Box 1015, San Francisco, CA, 94109,
or call him at (415) 653-1332.
Andrea Barron is a Ph.D. candidate in international relations
at the American University in Washington, DC, and is a member of
the Jewish Committee for Israeli-Palestinian Peace. |