Washington Report, February 20, Page 4
Lobby Activities
For Arabs:
The U.S. bombardments which followed President Reagan's announcement
of plans to withdraw the marines in Lebanon set off angry protests
by Arab American groups and gave new life to the campaign to get U.S.
forces out of Lebanon. At a press conference called by the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), executive director James Zogby
denounced what he called President Reagan's "racist bombing"
of Lebanon's Shuf mountains, saying it was carried out in support
of a "militant minority faction"—a reference to
President Gemayel's party. Mr. Zogby called on Congress to cut off
funding as a means of effecting the withdrawal of U.S. troops. Mr.
Reagan's policy, he added, had "destroyed" chances for
the U.S. to play a negotiating role in Lebanon and "virtually
closed the door" on American influence with moderate Arab governments.
For its part, the National Association of Arab Americans (NAAA)
stopped short of an explicit call for the withdrawal of U.S. forces,
but hinted that such a step should be taken because, it said, Lebanon
needs "neutral peacekeepers and impartial mediators."
U.S. credibility, according to an NAAA statement, had been "deeply
compromised."
Both ADC and NAAA sent memorandums to their members across the
country urging them to protest the bombings by writing letters to
newspaper editors, participating in radio call-in programs and in
other public forums. In Washington, the two groups lent their support
to activities coordinated by the American Druze Public Affairs Committee—an
organization formed last fall to protest American military actions
then taking place against Lebanese Druze. The committee organized
protests at the State Department and the White House, and helped
set up visits between its supporters and congressional staff members.
On the election trail, the "Jesse Jackson for President Committee"
recently announced that Mr. Zogby had been chosen as an advisor
on Arab American affairs.
For Israel:
The Reagan Administration's policy in Lebanon, coming under heavy
fire lately from both Republican and Democratic members of Congress,
has received some much needed support from the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Before President Reagan announced he
was removing U.S. marines from Lebanon, AIPAC successfully lobbied
House Democrats to revise a withdrawal resolution they had drafted
by removing passages that were critical of the Administration. At
the same time, the Democrats—led by Congressman Stephen Solarz
(D-N.Y.)—also agreed to insert language which cast some of
the blame for Lebanon's problems on Iran, Syria, and the Soviet
Union. Since Mr. Reagan made known his plans to move the marines
offshore, the resolution has been put on the shelf.
However, AIPAC is continuing to urge Congress to get behind the
President in support of the Lebanese government. "If the Gemayel
government falls," AIPAC said in a recent issue of its newsletter,
"it will be a severe setback to the United States, to Lebanon,
and to all who seek Middle East peace."
Meanwhile, AIPAC has also been on Capitol Hill promoting a "free
trade" agreement between Israel and the U.S. Negotiations on
an agreement—which would allow each country to export its
products to the other duty-free—were opened last month as
part of the U.S.'s new "strategic cooperation" with Israel.
At a hearing on the issue before the Senate Finance Committee, AIPAC
executive director Thomas Dine argued that a free trade agreement
would lead to an increase in Israel's exports and to a decrease
in its trade deficit with the U.S., which in each of the last two
years came to more than $500 million. He argued that this would,
over time, be of benefit to the U.S., too, because it would help
lessen Israel's financial dependency on it.
Currently, the U.S. has no free trade arrangements with any country.
However, Israel already exports 90 percent of its goods to the U.S.
duty-free under existing mechanisms. Only 55 percent of U.S. exports
to Israel last year enjoyed a similar status. |