Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, January/February
1999, page 54
Special Report
U.S., Israel at Odds Over Israeli Defense Sales
and Technology Transfer to India, China
By Shawn L. Twing
A September visit to China by Israels defense
minister and an October biannual meeting between U.S. and Israeli
officials highlighted increasing U.S. concern about Israeli arms
sales and Israels illegal retransfer of American military
technology to India and China.
In September, Israeli Defense Minister Yitzhak Mordechai
met in China with President Jiang Zemin to discuss increasing Israels
role in Chinas massive military modernization program. Mordechai
came to Shanghai, Xian, and Beijing with the heads of the
countrys major defense industries to open doors, make contacts
and win the green light from [Chinas] leadership to make deals,
Israels Jerusalem Post reported Sept. 13. Accompanying
Mordechai on his trip, according to the Post, were representatives
from virtually every Israeli defense company, including state-owned
Israel Aircraft Industries, Rafael, TAAS-Israel Industries, El-Op,
Tadiran, Rada, Elissra and Elbit.
Mordechais trip to China did not go unnoticed
in Washington. In the lead article of the November issue of Pointer,
a monthly supplement to Janes Intelligence Review, under
the title Israels Dirty Deals, writer Al Venter
points out that The remarkable proliferation of sophisticated
hi-tech weapons systems in Israel is raising questions in Washington.
Making the stuff is fine, say the Americans. The problem is who
Israel ends up selling [it] to.
The Jerusalem Post also recognized American
concerns. The Americans, meanwhile, are apprehensive about
the cozy ties being forged on this side of the world, which, they
fear, may involve the illegal transfer of U.S. technologies in Israels
hands, the Post reported. Its interesting to
note that nowhere in the article did the Post deny the legitimacy
of those concerns.
Americans should be worried. Despite a recent lull
in Israeli defense exports to China, Israeli companies have provided
China with substantial amounts of military hardware and technology
in the past, and there also have been widespread public allegations
from several sources, including the U.S. government, that Israel
has illegally sold substantial quantities of sensitive American
military technology repeatedly to China in direct violation of U.S.
export laws.
A Resurrected Lavi
Among the items and technology Israel allegedly has
sold to China are the Python-3 air-to-air missile, which is thought
to contain substantial amounts of American technology from the AIM-9L
Sidewinder missile, cruise missile technology, accuracy
modifications for ballistic missiles, and massive amounts of hardware,
technology and guidance for Chinas F-10 fighter, which is
strikingly similar to Israels failed Lavi light fighter. The
Lavi project, funded almost exclusively by U.S. taxpayers, received
more than $1.5 billion from the United States before it was cancelled
in 1987. (For more information about Israels illegal retransfer
of American military technology to China, see Congress Calls
for Sanctions If Israeli Technology Transfer to China Is Proven,
Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, November/December
1996, p. 9.)
Israel also has won a $250 million contract, with
Russia, to provide China with an advanced airborne early warning
(AEW) system similar in function to the U.S. AWACs platform, which
will greatly improve Chinas ability to conduct over-the-horizon
warfare. Chinas acquisition of an AEW system will provide
a dramatic advance in its operational abilities and will, according
to Heritage Foundation senior analyst Richard Fisher, significantly
erode the military technical edge held by the U.S. and Taiwan that
is necessary for deterring China.
It also is interesting to note that Israeli defense
officials accompanying Yitzhak Mordechai to China pleaded
with journalists accompanying [him] not to report on any possible
deals, claiming the Chinese were ultra-sensitive to publicity and
any report that appeared would likely scuttle the deal, according
to the Jerusalem Post. A more likely rationale for Israel
not wanting its dealings with China reported is to prevent U.S.
officials from learning of impending deals in time to prevent them,
particularly when they involve sensitive U.S. technology protected,
at least on paper, by U.S. export laws.
Less than a month after Defense Minister Mordechais
trip to China, U.S. and Israeli officials met in Israel for the
semiannual meeting of the Joint Political Military Group. One item
on the American agenda, according to the U.S. trade weekly Defense
News, was a request that Israel ban arms sales and transfers
of technology to India.
The United States imposed sanctions on India and rival
Pakistan in May after both countries successfully detonated nuclear
devices. To help enforce those sanctions, the United States has
asked suppliers of military assistance to both countries, including
Russia and Israel, to refrain from large-scale, destabilizing arms
sales to the subcontinent.
Sensitive Deals
Israel has been a particular target of Washingtons
efforts because of several sensitive arms deals in the offing, including
a potential $1 billion airborne early warning package, Defense
News reported. Other Israeli defense programs with India include
avionics upgrades for up to 400 Indian fighter aircraft, additional
unmanned aerial vehicles for reconnaissance, and the transfer of
Israels Green Pine fire control radar system developed for
the U.S.-Israel Arrow missile program, and paid for almost entirely
with U.S. taxpayer funds.
Israel insists that the Green Pine radar is not subject
to U.S. export law, although it is part of a joint U.S.-Israeli
defense program that already has received more than $800 million
in U.S. funding. Exporting Green Pine is our decision to make,
an Israeli official told Defense News.
Clearly this is not the U.S. view at all,
American University professor Duncan Clarke told Defense News.
Attempting to make the case that Arrow components are
exclusively Israeli is not well received in the Pentagon or the
State Department, he said. Responding to U.S. pressure, Defense
Minister Mordechai announced that Israeli defense firms would suspend
dealings with India temporarily. Lets be clear here,
an Israeli official told Defense News. This is not
a prohibition. Its a temporary, voluntary freeze that may
or may not be adhered to depending on the circumstances.
Shawn L.
Twing is Web site developer for the Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs. He can be reached by e-mail at stwing@washington-report.org |