January 1996, pg. 29
Special Report
Waterless Palestinian Village's Plight Illustrates
Weakness of Oslo II Pact
By Allegra Pacheco
The Palestinian village of Obadiyya outside of Jerusalem has been
without water for more than a year. The Israeli water company in
the occupied territoriesMekorothas been pumping just
enough water into the local piping system to reach the neighboring
Israeli settlements of Maale Adumim and Qedar, while Obadiyya remains
dry.
In 1994, the residents of Obadiyya petitioned the Israeli High
Court to compel the Israeli occupying authorities to supply water.
Fearing an outright scandal, the Israeli authorities promised to
supply water immediately, and on that promise, lawyers for Obadiyya
withdrew the petition. One year passed, and the village still had
no water. The villagers recently submitted another petition and
another hearing was scheduled. Two weeks before they were to stand
before the Supreme Court again, the Israeli authorities promised
for the second time that the village would receive water.
Israel's Hold Complete
Since 1967, the Israelis have had a complete hold on the Palestinian
natural water supply, issuing numerous military orders and restrictions
that still are in effect even after the signing of Oslo II. All
Palestinian wells in the occupied territories remain under a strict
Israeli system of controls and permits which prevent Palestinians
from drilling new wells to replace those that have been taken over
for Israeli use or rehabilitating those that have dried from Israeli
over-pumping for expanding Jewish settlements. Excessive over-pumping
by Israeli wells, whether located in the occupied territories or
within Israel's borders, has severely damaged original Palestinian
wells and has markedly decreased the quality of the ground water.
The underlying objective of the Israeli apartheid-water policy
in the West Bank has been to restrict pumping from Palestinian wells
to a bare minimum to preserve the largest volume of usable ground
water for Israeli use. Indeed, in 28 years of occupation, only 23
wells have been dug for a population of over 1 million Palestinians.
By contrast, Mekorot has drilled 32 wells to serve Jewish settlers
in the West Bank numbering no more than 100,000 persons.
The water shortage has created a macabre form of "Prohibition"
in the West Bank. Palestinians from Obadiyya and elsewhere are forced
to buy water in small quantities on the black market at the rate
of 20 New Israeli Shekels (one U.S. dollar equals roughly three
shekels) per cubic meter. Meanwhile the cost for Jews receiving
water through the Israeli water company is 2-3.5 NIS per cubic meter.
Palestinian agriculture is virtually on the same
level as it was in 1967.
Israeli exploitation of Palestinian water resources for Jewish
settlers and Israeli cities completely violates the letter and the
spirit of international law. Under the Hague Regulations governing
the conduct of military occupiers (which Israel accepts as legally
binding) the plundering of the property and resources of the occupied
population is expressly forbidden. Article 33 prohibits pillage
in any form, and Article 55 states:
The Occupying Power may not requisition foodstuffs, articles...available
in the occupied territory, except for use by the occupation forces
and the administration personnel [i.e., the IDF] and then only
if the requirements of the civilian population have been taken
into account.
The plundering of Palestinian water sources by the Israelis is
only part of the destructive policies in force in the occupied territories
that have devastated Palestinian society. The confiscation of over
65 percent of West Bank land, coupled with the drying up of thousands
of dunams by diverting the water, has virtually destroyed a large
sector of the Palestinian economy. Palestinian agriculture is virtually
on the same level as it was in 1967. Since the Israeli occupation,
only three new wells have been dug for Palestinian agricultural
use. Further, the water rationing for Palestinians has forced Palestinian
agriculture to become seasonally rainwater dependent, reducing its
competitiveness with Israeli year-round agriculture nourished by
plentiful irrigation systems using water from many of the West Bank
aquifers closed to Palestinian farmers.
Oslo II provides no relief from this drought. Indeed, Palestinian
negotiators have agreed to postpone discussion of critical water
issues until the establishment of a joint committee designed to
"protect the interests of both sides." The subjugation
and exploitation of Palestinian land continues.
No Legal Claim
By agreeing to participate in a joint committee protecting "both
sides," Palestinian negotiators have effectively legitimized
the Israeli claim to Palestinian water supplies. But no such claim
legally exists. The Israeli occupiers have no right whatsoever to
Palestinian water resources. The fact that Israeli citizens need
the water resources does not give them the right to claim them.
Nor is there any legitimate claim regarding water for the Jewish
settlements whose presence in the West Bank violates all international
norms and is considered illegitimate by every nation-state including
the United States. Under international law, the Jewish settlers
have never had and do not have any legitimate basis to continue
residing in the occupied territories, nor to demand a share of Palestinian
water.
And yet under Oslo II, Palestinian negotiators have agreed to discuss
the Israeli demands, exposing how successful the Israelis have been
in legitimizing the Jewish settlements and their confiscation of
Palestinian resources, and the extent to which the Palestinians
have been duped into relinquishing sovereign rights over these natural
resources before the discussions even begin. Instead of forcing
negotiations on dismantling the settlements and transferring sovereignty
over water in the West Bank back to the indigenous Palestinians,
the Palestinian members of this joint committee have from the outset
cornered themselves into an agenda focusing on sustaining the green
lawns and swimming pools of Israeli settlements in Maale Adumim
and Qedar with water from desiccated villages like Obadiyya.
In a "normal" withdrawal from occupation, the occupying
power would set up a joint committee to discuss arrangements for
paying the Palestinians for a constant water supply. Under Oslo
II and its twisted norms, the withdrawing Israeli power continues
to have legitimate rights to the natural resources of the territories
it no longer occupies.
Allegra Pacheco is a staff attorney for the Society of St. Yves,
a human rights/legal aid office in Jerusalem. The Society is representing
the Obadiyya village in its petition to the Israeli High Court. |