January 1996, pg. 19
Human Rights
Proposed Law Would Legalize Torture of Palestinians
By Geoff Lumetta
Amnesty International is protesting a recent bill proposed in the
Israeli Knesset that the group says effectively legalizes torture
of prisoners and detainees in Israel and the occupied territories.
The proposed amendment, ironically called "Prohibition on Torture,"
calls for a 10-20 year prison sentence for any public servant who
tortures or authorizes torture. But Amnesty International pointed
out that the bill allows mental and physical harm while a prisoner
is being questioned. The bill defines torture as "severe pain
or suffering, whether physical or mental, except for pain or suffering
inherent in interrogation procedures or punishment according to
the law."
For years Amnesty and other human rights organizations have exposed
the torture that occurs during Israeli interrogation of Palestinian
detainees. They say Palestinians are often hooded, deprived of sleep,
sometimes for four to six days while kept standing or sitting in
painful positions, beaten, violently shaken and confined to narrow,
cupboard-sized cells.
The Israeli government argues that the law is necessary for the
state to take action against security threats. But the United Nations
Convention Against Torture states that "no exceptional circumstances
whatsoever, whether...international political instability or any
other public emergency, may be involved as a justification of torture."
Amnesty called on Israel to abide by the U.N. Convention, which
Israel ratified in 1991.
The organization also warned that the amendment would give greater
opportunity for abuses by the General Security Service—also
known as Shin Bet or Shabak—which is Israel's main security
service involved in interrogating prisoners. "The Israeli government
should now cease playing with words and act to prohibit torture
in Israeli interrogation centers."
Human Rights Watch: Government, Armed Opposition Impede
Algerian Elections
Despite claims of fairness by the Algerian government, the Nov.
16 elections that gave Acting President Laimine Zeroual 60 percent
of the vote were not free and unhindered, according to the international
human rights group Human Rights Watch / Middle East. The New York-based
group said the country's first multi-party elections lacked an adequate
number of international monitors to verify the accuracy of the results
or the turnout levelonly 100 monitors for 16 million eligible
voters. It also reported that voters feared administrative harassment
from the established military government for not voting, as well
as threats of violence from radical groups that opposed the election.
"The pressures on voters came not only from violent Islamist
militants who have threatened those who participate in the election,
but also from the government, which determined how the campaign
and the election would be conducted with no input from any elected
body, and which has muzzled peaceful critics of the election,"
said Human Rights Watch in a statement released before the election.
The military government also barred from the election candidates
who had any success in the 1991 electionsincluding those affiliated
with the three leading opposition parties, the National Liberation
Front (FLN); the Socialist Forces Front (FFS); and the outlawed
Islamic Salvation Front (FIS). "This almost certainly is not
the field of candidates that would have emerged in a freer political
climate," Human Rights Watch said.
The 75 percent turnout claimed by the acting military government
was bolstered by the regime's stifling of opposition voices. According
to Human Rights Watch, the government ordered a television black-out
of any viewpoints hostile to the election; it arrested leaders of
the Berber Cultural Movement, which opposed the election; it confiscated
at the printing press three recent issues of La Nation, a
weekly paper critical of the elections; and it refused to allow
several meetings organized by political parties who opposed the
election.
The vote marked the first time Zeroual and the provisional government
have faced an election since being selected by a military-backed
elite in 1991. The National Transitional Council, as the government
is called, ousted and replaced most local officials who were swept
into office by the FIS victory in the 1990 municipal elections.
The overthrow sparked a civil war in Algeria that has killed more
than 30,000 people since 1992.
Although Human Rights Watch did not condemn the elections, which
it called a necessary step to peace in the country, it acknowledged
that both armed opposition groups and the government have "violated
human rights and imposed other obstacles" that prevented truly
free elections.
Israeli Solders Storm Palestinian Statistics Office
According to the Palestinian National Authority Ministry of Information,
Israeli soldiers raided the main offices of the Palestinian Central
Statistics Department in Ramallah Nov. 22, arresting one employee
and disturbing the work in the office. The Statistics Department
was preparing information for the Palestinian legislative elections
scheduled for Jan. 20 when the raid occurred. The department director,
Dr. Hassan Abu-Libdeh, said the act was an interference in Palestinian
affairs and an infringement on Palestinian sovereignty. The Palestinian
Ministry said the army gave no prior warning of the raid and it
speculated that the act was meant to derail Palestinian confidence
in the peace process. "The immediate conclusion one would reach
is that the Israeli military authorities are interested in sabotaging
the process and provoking Palestinians," the Ministry wrote
in its weekly publication.
Geoff Lumetta is the features editor of the Washington Report.
|