January 1994, Page 15
The Party Line
(Israeli leaders and their U.S. Lobbyists seek by
their statements to set the parameters of U. S media reporting and
official commentary on the Middle East and American relations with
it. As echoed by Israel's fellow travelers in the U.S. media, such
statements become the party line. It is echoed by American pack
journalists, who may or may not understand their disservice to truth
when they do, but who know their careers will suffer if they don't.
As they see it, their choices are to follow the line and be published,
ignore it and be ignored, or challenge it and be reviled as an "anti-Semite."
Below is a problem that concerns Israeli officials, a snapshot of
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin laying down the line, and examples
of the results.)
The Arab Boycott The Problem: Prime Minister Yitzhak
Rabin is ignoring the Arab offer to lift the boycott of Israel in
return for a freeze on Jewish settlements in the occupied territories.
Instead he is seeking to link it to the Oslo agreement. He has orchestrated
all of Israel's propaganda resources to demand that the boycott
be lifted even before negotiating the peace agreement's final form,
and how it will be applied in Jerusalem.
Laying Down the Party Line
"Following a 35-minute meeting here with Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak, Rabin said the 'key issue' confronting the region
in the months ahead is whether Arab statesincluding those
that have maintained trade and other boycotts against Israeldemonstrate
their support of the peace process by normalizing relations with
the Jewish state. 'We have done something. We expect not only to
give but to get something in return and not only from those who
signed the agreement,' Rabin said. 'The time has come, on their
part, for Arab countries to come and say, "You have done something.
We will change our relations with you." This is what Israel
expects."'
Excerpted from report by Cairo correspondent
William Claiborne in the Washington Post, Sept. 20,
1993
Following the Party Line U.S. Government Example:
"Now that the Israelis and the Palestinians have
agreed to work together to promote their economic well-being, it
is certainly illogical for Arab nations to continue their boycott
of Israel. Every moment that the boycott remains in force, those
responsible are punishing Palestinians as well as Israelis. The
boycott is a relic of the past. It should be relegated to history
right now."
U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher,
in a foreign policy speech, Sept. 20, 1993
Israel Lobby Example:
"The centerpiece of U. S. diplomacy should be
to persuade Arab and non-Arab Muslim states to end their political
and economic boycotts of Israel. Normal commercial relationships
between Israel and its Arab neighbors will do more to improve the
quality of life of the peoples of the area than any infusion of
outside economic aid."
Former Reagan White House Middle East adviser
(and Irangate participant) Howard Teicher, Los Angeles Times,
Sept. 20, 1993
Jewish Media Example: "An end to the Arab boycott
is seen as inevitable if the peace process goes forward. The chief
benefit of such a change, says Bank of Israel Governor Ya'acov Frenkel,
would not be increased Israeli-Arab trade, but rather an influx
of Western industry and investment capital to this country [Israel]."
Jerusalem correspondent Larry Derfner, The
Jewish Week, Queens, NY, Sept. 24-30 1993
Mainstream Media Example:
"Arab delegates [at a State Department meeting
to pledge financial support for Palestinian administration of Gaza
and Jericho] rebuffed an American plea to abandon their boycott
of Israel, which Vice President Al Gore said had 'no place in a
world seeking peace."'
Excerpted from report by Steven Greenhouse,
New York Times, Oct. 2, 1993
Jewish Media Example:
"What of the Arab states? This is the time for
them to end their boycott of Israel which, since 1948, has cost
Israel some $50 billion in investments, according to some estimates.
The boycott targets not only Israeli companies but any company doing
business with Israeli companies or supporting Jewish charities.
Hundreds of American companies are on the boycott list . . . Ending
the boycott would have an impact beyond the practical, economic
terms, which alone are of vital importance. It would prove that
the 21 Arab states are sincere about their professed new attitude
toward Israel."
Editorial in The Jewish Week, Queens,
NY, Oct. 1-7, 1993
Israel Lobby Example:
"My own conversations with Prime Minister Rabin
and President Clinton, along with the expert analysis of our AIPAC
staff, suggest that there is a vast array of problems still to be
solved. For example, no Arab country has yet relaxed the hated boycott
of Israel."
Excerpt from fund-raising letter by American
Israel Public Affairs Committee President Steven Grossman, Oct.
8, 1993
Israel Lobby Example:
"While Israel has taken serious risks for peace
and committed major funds for Palestinian development projects,
the Arab states have refused to take the minimal reciprocal step
of lifting the economic boycott of Israel . . . The boycott's continuance
past the historic Israeli-Palestinian agreement adds insult to injury."
Near East Report, weekly publication
of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Oct. 11, 1993
Israel Lobby Example:
"The Arab refusal to end the economic boycott
of Israel following the Rabin-Arafat handshake is not a good omen."
Morris B. Abram, former chairman, Conference
of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, writing in
Wall Street Journal, Oct. 14, 1993
Mainstream Media Example:
"Clinton aides noted with satisfaction that the
Arab League Boycott Office was supposed to hold a meeting in Damascus
on Sunday to reinforce the Arab boycott of Israel, but that under
American pressure the meeting had been indefinitely postponed."
Excerpted from report by correspondent Thomas
L. Friedman, New York Times, Oct. 26, 1993
U.S. Government Example:
"The Arab boycott must be dismantled. This is
an impediment to implementation of the Declaration of Principles,
since economic cooperation is key to its success. The boycott is
a relic of the past, a relic of a different era. It is inconsistent
with the progress of peace."
Dennis Ross, consultant to U.S. State Department,
in speech to National Association of Arab Americans (NAAA), Oct.
30, 1993
Congressional Example:
"I emphasize that the attitude of many Arab states
in the wake of the White House meeting in September has been a blow
to peace. The refusal of moderate Arabs to terminate the anachronistic,
self-defeating and senseless boycott of Israel is disturbing . .
. As long as the Arab states persist in maintaining these official
acts of hostility to Israel, they cannot expect attitudes in Congress
to change significantly."
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) in speech to NAAA,
Oct. 30, 1993
RHC |