January 1991, Page 91
Publishers' Page
The Pivotal Year
This is the first month of what can be the pivotal year for US
policy in the Middle East. If the Bush administration plays it right,
not only will there be no war this year in the Gulf, there may never
again be any need for the US to play policeman in the Middle East.
Not for the rest of this century, or the next one either.
This We Believe
We believe that the US applies a double standard to the Arabs and
Israel, for domestic political reasons. We believe this underlies
all US foreign policy problems in the Middle East. It also underlies
many of the tribulations suffered by our Middle Eastern friends,
from Morocco to Pakistan. Because it subsidizes increasingly extremist
Israeli governments, this double standard even underlies Israel's
own sea of troubles.
Why We're in the Gulf
We wouldn't have troops in the Gulf if Iraqi President Saddam Hussain
hadn't hoped to capitalize upon Arab resentment of perceived US
support for Israeli expansionism. Our Middle Eastern allies would
have had the arms they needed to defend themselves, if it hadn't
been for the successful machinations of Israel's US lobby in Congress.
New Proponents of Common Sense
Many Americans coming back from the Gulf are going to understand
this clearly, just as have the American educators, technicians,
and businessmen who preceded them in the Middle East. We think they'll
all support the Bush administration if, before or after the battle
with Saddam Hussain is won, it takes up Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak
Shamir's current challenge.
America's Other Middle East War
As this issue of the Washington Report demonstrates, Shamir
has already declared all-out political war on the Bush administration.
On the other hand, never in history has Israel so desperately needed
a US financial bailout. Shamir is counting on Israel's US supporters
to make life so miserable for the Bush administration that Shamir
will get the money, instead of Bush getting the peacemaking concessions
the US must have from Israel if our whole Middle East position is
not to come tumbling down.
Israel's American Fifth Column
As readers of the Jewish weekly press are well aware, Shamir's
allies include B'nai B'rith's Anti-Defamation League, the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the Council of Presidents
of Major American Jewish Organizations which is supposed to represent
all national Jewish organizations but which has fallen under the
control of the pro-Likud hard-liners. Other national Jewish organizations
seem to have run for cover or turned mute.
Israel's Media Holy Warriors
It makes a lot of editors of those Jewish weekly newspapers, some
of whom are still the kind of old-line liberals who once earned
American Jews a place of special honor in American political life,
very uncomfortable to report all this. In the second half of 1990,
they've watched Israel's media holy warriors, like A.M. Rosenthal,
William Safire and Charles Krauthammer, openly demand a US-Iraqi
war.
America's Pro-Israel War Lovers
It makes liberal Jewish observers even more uncomfortable to see
Jewish former high officials in the US government, under Republican
administrations at that, strike out in support of Shamir's policies,
and against those of the Bush administration, as do Henry Kissinger
and Richard Perle.
They're Not Fooling Anyone
However, Richard the Rascal and Henry the Horrible aren't fooling
anyone, anymore. They want the US to neutralize the Iraqi army,
now, so that the extremists now running Israel can continue holding
the West Bank until the opportunity arises to expel all of the Palestinians
into a destabilized Jordan. Just as they tried to turn Israel's
savage actions at the Hararn Al-Sharif into a "Palestinian
attack on Jewish worshippers, " they'll support the next Israeli
provocation, and the next and the next, even if Israel's Mossad
finally has to hire a Palestinian maniac to blow up a busload of
US or Israeli schoolchildren in order to trick Americans and Arabs
into killing one another. Israel's current right-wing Likud government
is determined to end any hope that the US will go into the next
century with friends anywhere in the Middle East, other than Israel.
Does the President Understand?
We think George Bush and James Baker understand this. They have
the power to stop it. They know, however, that when they do, Israel's
American fifth column will go all out to cripple them politically,
using its powerful supporters in the media.
Think Before You Act
That's why we think this is the crucial year. That's why our readers
might think before they speak or act right now. Are you really speaking
for yourself, or are you being manipulated?
Congress and the Gulf
Leadership to halt the Israeli-orchestrated rush toward war in
late November and December came from Congress. Bless them. Leadership
to restore balance to US Middle East policy can't come from Congress,
however. It's Israeli-occupied territory. AIPAC's long-term lease
won't expire until there is true campaign finance reform or a limitation
on terms in office, or both.
The President and Israel
If the president takes the lead, however, Congress will eventually
help him curb Israel. Look at how much sense Congress made in the
hearings about force versus sanctions in the Gulf. But in taking
on something as powerful as the Israel lobby, the president must
lead.
When Knees Turn to Jelly
The president has been very macho in staring down Iraq's hard-eyed
El Supremo. But the Bush knees may turn to jelly when he faces the
prospect of hostile fire from now to elections by cold-eyed George
Will, fork-tongued Thomas Friedman, and blurry-eyed and blurry-tongued
Jeane Kirkpatrick, none of whom give him trouble on the Gulf, but
all of whom will be planting media mines in his path to Jerusalem.
Getting Our Act Together
Our advice is to look down the road and stop thinking as Democrats
or Republicans on this one. We would be giving exactly the same
advice, and did, when it was Jimmy Carter trying to do the right
thing and Israel's whole formidable American lobby, including powerful
fifth columnists in his own party, pulled together to pull him down.
Much to Do, and Not Much Time
If you agree, or at least suspect that in our bumbling way we may
have stumbled upon the truth, you must not sit this year out. If
the president sets out to lead the US toward justice in Jerusalem,
for the sake of all Americans, and for the people of the Middle
East, our children, our grandchildren and generations to come, try
to cool the second guessing, nit-picking, belly-aching, and hand
wringing, and roll up your sleeves. There's much to do, and not
much time to do it.
The Washington Report's Piece of the Action:
Let's get the word to the American people, particularly those in
the Gulf, and those whose loved ones are serving in the Gulf. Their
minds are focused on the problem. We can show them the solutions.
Our New Clothes
This issue consists of 96 pages, with a lot more color pages than
ever before. There are economies of scale. With paid circulation
up 35 percent in 12 months, one copy doesn't 20 to 30 hours on the
radio. Anyway, we'd cost much more to print than the 60-page January
1990 edition, or the 54-page January 1989 edition. It's a lot more
work to edit, but it also gives us more space to present a variety
of views and useful information.
Mix It Up
We hope next to expand the advertising, but aside from that there
probably won't be further major format changes this year. Having
done our part to create a handsome and informative magazine, we
hope our subscribers will do their part and introduce it to others.
We don't mean only one local talk show host or your own member of
the clergy. We mean 10 to 20 opinion molders, and members
of your family and concerned friends. The tear-out sheet
just inside the back cover shows you how. The postage paid envelope
in this issue makes it easy. Don't just offer to hold our coat this
year. Take off yours and mix it up.
The Marketing Plan
We've spent every cent that has come in from subscriptions on improving
the format of the magazine and buying equipment so that we could
do the typesetting in-house that we couldn't afford to buy outside.
When people ask about our marketing plan, therefore, they get a
rueful shrug. It's based upon appeals for help from existing subscribers,
like the appeal just above.
And the Talk Shows
The publisher and executive editor also spend a lot of time on
radio and television talk shows, at least one a day each, where
we are allowed to give the listeners/viewers the toll free number
for introductory copies of the magazine. It's brought us thousands
of subscribers over the years, and, we suppose, exposed tens of
millions of Americans to our views. But it's labor-intensive. For
half an hour or an hour on the air, we may have 50,000 listeners.
Of diem, however, perhaps only 50 call for a free copy, and, ultimately,
perhaps 5 or 10 subscribe.
The Power of Advertising
All this is slow and sure, and we'll certainly continue. But there's
got to be a faster way. We think it's paid advertising, and that's
very expensive. It's something we'd like major donors to consider
helping us with. For example, would you sponsor an advertisement
in the A section, editorial page or in the Sunday opinion section
of a major daily newspaper in your area? The ad would give our address
and subscription data and credit you for paying the cost. Or would
you consider going halves with us?
We think such advertisements might bringing 100 or 200 new subscriptions.
That beats like to find out about this kind of advertising in major
newspapers, and, of course, in magazines.
Please give us your ideas, with one caveat. We must write, or approve,
the advertisement text, word by word.
Too Many Texts
The word "text" brings us to a painful subject. We're
getting too many of them to handle with our small staff. You can
help by observing the following:
Letters to the Editor
We love them, but make them pertinent to something you read in
our magazine, not someone else's.
Other People's Mail
We get far more than we can print, but the more we get the better
selection we can provide to guide our own readers in how to make
their letters effective. Please don't be disappointed if
you seldom see any of the letters you send reprinted. Be aware that
we also try to contact anyone who writes a good letter (meaning
one we agree with) and who isn't already a subscriber. (Most are,
frankly, and, with all due humility, we think that's one reason
their letters are good.)
Seeing the Light
People can write only one of these articles, based upon their own
personal experience. We always are looking for good ones.
Editorials or Op-Ed Type Articles
We write our own. Send yours to your favorite newspaper. Our readers
are specialists, or at least quite knowledgeable about the Middle
East, or they wouldn't be our readers. The generalized piece you
sent to the Christian Science Monitor but they failed to
publish is not appropriate for our readers, even if you are knowledgeable
and famous.
Special Reports
All of our monthly columnists call us at the beginning of each
cycle to tell us what they want to write about. We play traffic
cop, assigning the topic to the first one who speaks for it, and
keeping them out of each each other's subject areas.
For Beginners
Don't just send us an unsolicited manuscript. It probably won't
be read. Call us first and we'll talk about it.
For Bombers
We also don't open packages without a return address from someone
we know. They go right into the dumpster. Same day service. If you
want to send us a package, manuscript or even thick letter, and
we don't know you, telephone to tell us who you are, what's in the
package and put your telephone number on the package along with
your return address so that we can verify it. Pftttzzz to you, Abul
Abbas and Son of Kahane.
For Bothers
We have a telephone company service that provides us a daily printout
of the telephone number of every caller, by exact time, day and
night. If we think you're a harasser, you'll first get a call from
the telephone company. If, after discussing the matter with you,
they think you're a harasser too, they'll warn you and then bill
you, not us, for your calls. Maybe, instead, you should contribute
the money to AIPAC, and keep your name off the police blotter.
For Bookers
We're generally looking for reviews by writers we know. But if
you think you're the kind we should know, call and suggest the title
you'd like to do. We'll tell you if it's spoken for, and if it isn't
and we're interested in the book, we'll give you the green light.
We pay only on publication, however, and that goes for everything
in the magazine.
A Silence in the Winter's Night
Our regular readers have come to expect a shriek of pain every
December on the publishers' page as we contemplate the debts we
are carrying into the new year. In the last issue we had to forgo
the publishers' page for space reasons. That's the reason you didn't
hear the shriek.
We had expected to finesse our debts by issuing a combined December-January
issue, thus saving about $45,000. There was too much to report,
however, so we didn't skip an issue. As a result, where we expected
to carry over debts of about $60,000, which is par for the course,
we're carrying $100,000 in debts instead.
Shriek!!!
Please help if you can. Checks dated Dec. 31 or before, and made
out to the AET Library Endowment, are tax-exempt for the 1990 income
tax year. Checks dated from Jan. 1 on can be credited to the 1991
income tax year. Either way, contributors of $100 (untied or tied
to donated subscriptions and books) or more will find their names
in the next compilation (in March) of the Angel's Choir, like that
in this issue.
Angels also get a book for their coffee table, but, most of all
they get a GREAT FEELING from knowing that they were there when
they were needed in what we hope will be America's finest, not most
deadly, year in the Middle East. You can help make the difference,
this month. |